This video is about the everlasting hope that is found in the risen Lord Jesus Christ. Why do millions of people around the world celebrate Easter? What evidence is there that Jesus Christ is alive today? Discover the answers to these questions and much more. Please share this video with those you want to see in heaven.
Scriptures are from the New King James Version unless otherwise noted. Pictures are used with permission from Good News Productions International and College Press Publishing/ www.Freebibleimages.org, www.Goodsalt.com, or they are creative common licenses.
The Qur’an or the Bible? (Two different Scriptures)
Introduction
In our last article we began to compare the sacred writings of Islam (the Qur’an) with the sacred writings of Christianity (the Bible). Both the Bible and the Qur’an claim to have been revealed at a certain place, and over a period of time. They speak of people, places, and events. If they are true, then we would expect to find evidence for their claims, and especially verification for what they say in the period in which they themselves claim they were revealed.
We learned that the standard Christian narrative says that the Bible, a collection of sixty-six books, was written by about forty people in three different languages – Hebrew (most of the Old Testament), Aramaic (Ezra 4:8-6:18; 7:12-26; Jer. 10:11; Dan. 2:4-7:28), [1] and Koine Greek (all the New Testament) – on three different continents (Asia, Africa, Europe) over a period of about two thousand years, from the time the book of Job was written during the patriarchal period (2100-1900 B.C.) [2]to the writing of the last book of the New Testament (Revelation) by the apostle John (95 A.D).[3]The first thirty-nine books are called the Old Testament and record the anticipation of the coming of Christ. The final twenty-seven books are called the New Testament and record Jesus’ life, death, resurrection, final victory, and rule on earth.
The standard Islamic narrative[4] teaches that the Qur’an, is uncreated and exists eternally on clay tablets in heaven (Qur’an 85:22). This uncreated Qur’an was sent down from Allah (the god of Islam) to one person only, the prophet Mohammed (Qur’an 39:41), through the angel Gabriel, in one language (Arabic), over a period of twenty-three years in two different locations – Mecca (610-622 A.D.) and Medina (622-632 A.D.) [5] – in central western Arabia (see above map). [6] Islam claims that Mohammed’s empire is represented by the brown area on the above map where Mecca and Medina are located. When Mohammed died in 632 A.D., that is how large Islam’s empire was.
After Mohammed died, then you have the next four successors to Mohammed called Caliphs who came to power: Abu Bakr (632-644 A.D.), Umar (634-644 A.D.), Uthman (644-656 A.D), and Ali (656-661 A.D.). These rulers expanded the Islamic Empire (lighter brown area) west to Tripoli, North Africa, north to Turkey, east to Afghanistan, and south down to Yemen and Oman. This time period is called the Rushidun Period (632-661 A.D.). And then during the Umayyad Dynasty (661-750 A.D.) established by Caliph Mu’awiya, and others after him, Islam expanded all the way west to Spain and northwestern Africa, further east to northwestern India and central Asia as represented by the purple area on the map.
Let’s look at the timeline for Islam’s emergence according to the standard Islamic narrative (see above timeline). Mohammed was born in 570 A.D and started to receive his revelations in a place called Mecca in 610 A.D. In 621 A.D., the Mi’raj took place whereby Mohammed is suddenly awakened in the middle of the night and told to get on the back of a winged horse called a Buraq, which transported him from Mecca to Jerusalem where he ascended through the seven heavens and visited all the previous prophets (Jesus was found in the second heaven, Moses in the sixth, and Abraham in the seventh). [7] Finally, Mohammed was taken into the presence of Allah where he bargained Allah down in his command to pray fifty times to five times a day. [8]
In 622 A.D., Mohammed fled from Mecca 200 miles north up to Medina when he heard that leaders of Meccan tribes and clans vowed to assassinate him. This migration is known as the Hijra. [9] As Mohammed grows in strength and numbers, he takes over Medina and then returns to Mecca in 630 A.D. and takes it over and is therefore in control of both Mecca and Medina. In 632 A.D., Mohammed dies after being poisoned by one of his wives.
After Mohammed’s death, the first Caliph (successor to Mohammed) Abu Bakr reigned for two years (632-634 A.D.) and died peacefully. The second Caliph, Umar, ruled 10 years (634-644 A.D.) and was killed. Then Uthman reigned 12 years (644-656 A.D.) as the third Caliph before he was killed. It is during his rule that the Qur’an was compiled and completed in 652 A.D. Then Ali, the first cousin and son-in-law of Mohammed, reigns as the 4th Caliph from 656-661 A.D. and was assassinated. [10]
Thus, Islam was fully formed by 661 A.D. (mid 7th century) according to the standard Islamic narrative. But how do we know these people, places, and times in Islam’s history? Where did they come from? This leads us to discuss the documentary evidence.
The Qur’an’s Documentary Evidence
Smith states, “When anyone asks Muslims how they can be sure that the story they have of Muhammad is true, they point to numerous books on their bookshelves and claim that they were written by those who knew Muhammad; that they saw what he did and heard what he said. But they never show us their original ‘extant’ codices or manuscripts, nor do they ever give us any forensically tested dates concerning when exactly those books were originally written. To be valid witnesses for Muhammad we must have these traditional writer’s original ‘extant’ manuscripts to look at, in order to know whether they really wrote what they are purported to have written.
“Remember, the compilers of the prophet’s life and sayings all worked under the authority of the Muslim Caliphs. So, they would have had access to durable writing material, such as Parchments and Vellum (i.e. using animal skins), unlike our earliest Christian writings, which were all written on Papyrus (non-durable leaves). So, the Muslim written texts should still be in existence even today, a mere 1400 years later. Consequently, there is no excuse not to have the original manuscripts.
“Let’s find out what we now know about the ‘extant’ manuscripts of the Sira [Mohammed’s biography], the Hadith[Mohammed’s sayings], the Sahaba’s codices [Mohammed’s companions] and the Tabi’un’s codices (the 2nd generation), as well as the Ta’rikh [Mohammed’s history] and the Tafsir [Mohammed’s commentaries].” [11][brackets and emphasis added]
1) Available Muslim documents: Look with me at the above chart entitled “Sources for the ‘Islamic Traditions’ according to Islam.”[12] Islam claims that what we know about Mohammed and the Qur’an comes from several sources. First, it comes from the Sahaba or the eyewitnesses/companions of Mohammed and the Tabi’un, the second generation who received what they knew from the Sahaba, shown in red print above. Islam claims that these sources were written in the late 7th century to early 8th century, by Muwatta ibn Malik, Sahifa Hamman B. Munabbih, Musnad ibn Hanbal, Musanaf Abdul Razzaq, Musnad al-Tayalisi, Abi Shaybah. [13]
The second primary Muslim source isthe Sira or biography of Mohammed shown in green print above. According to Islamic tradition, Ibn Ishaq (d. 767 A.D.) wrote Mohammed’s biography. [14] But notice that Ishaq died in 767A.D., over 130 years after Mohammed’s death. Did Ishaq know Mohammed or hear his teachings or observe his actions? No. So how could he have known Mohammed’s biography? We do not have any of Ishaq’s writings today. Hence, where did the biography of Mohammed come from?
Islamic tradition says Ibn Hisham wrote down what Ishaq said about the life of Mohammed, but Hisham died in 827 A.D, [15] almost 200 years after Mohammed’s death. And Hisham left out what he didn’t like about Ishaq’s portrayal of Mohammed. [16] Then another man, Al Waqidi (d. 835 A.D.) wrote down the military campaigns of Mohammed, but he also died 233 years after Mohammed’s death. [17] Thus, Ibn Hisham and Al-Waqidi actually give us the biography of Mohammed, not Ishaq. So, this is the first genre.
The third Muslim primary source is called theHadith or sayings of Mohammed pictured in blue print in the above chart. These Muslim writers include Sahih Bukhari (d. 870 A.D.) who is considered the most important of all the other hadith contributors. He “admitted that of the 300,000 hadith he collected, he considered only 100,00 might be true. He then narrowed this number down to 7,275, many of which are repetitions so that the total number is in fact near 3,000. That means that even he admitted there were errors in over 295,000 [98%] of the hadith.”[18] [brackets and emphasis added] Other hadith contributors include Sahih Muslim (d. 875 A.D.), At-Tirmidhi (d. 892 A.D.), Ibn Maja(d. 886 A.D.), Abu Dawud (d. 899 A.D.), and An-Nisa’i (d. 915 A.D.). Notice that there is a gap of over 238+ years between the times Mohammed allegedly spoke these words and the first copies that are currently known by writers of the hadith. [19] Did any of these men know Mohammed or hear what he said? No. But Islam claims they wrote down what Mohammed said.
The fourth Muslim source is the tafsir or commentaries on the Qur’an pictured in light brown print in the chart above. Smith notes that 25% of the Qur’an is not even understood by Muslim scholars. [20] As I read the Qur’an, I find it difficult to comprehend. Some stories don’t have beginnings or endings, or they seem to begin in the middle of the story. There are no transitional phrases between stories to help you follow the author’s train of thought.
The fifth Muslim source is the Tarikh or the histories of Mohammed also pictured in light brown print in the above chart. Both the tafsir and tarikh contributions were first written down by Al Tabari who died in 923 A.D., [21] almost 300 years after Mohammed. Did Al Tabari know Mohammed or witness his words and actions? No, of course not.
Thus, according to the standard Islamic narrative, everything we know about Mohammed from Muslim documents – who he was and what he said and did – comes 50-300 years after Mohammed died.
But more recent research shows that these Islamic documents are not nearly as old as Muslim scholars believe. Look at the timeline above for extant (existing) Manuscripts for everything we know about Islam’s origins. [22] From left to right, Islam claims that the Sahaba and the Tabi’un, the first and second generation of eyewitnesses to Mohammed and the Qur’an, were written in the late 7th to early 8th centuries, and yet there is no 7th – 8th century documents for these writings. They do not appear in writing until the 9th to 13th centuries: Muwatta ibn Malik:9th century (200 years later), Sahifa Hamman B. Munabbih: 12th century (500 years later), Musnad ibn Hanbal:13th century (600 years later), Musanaf Abdul Razzaq:13th century (600 years later), Musnad al-Tayalisi:13th century (600 years later), Abi Shaybah:13th century (600 years later) – this suggests they were all written by others over 200-600 years later and redacted or attributed back to the 7th – 8th centuries! Thus, they are most likely all fraudulent. [23]
Islam maintains that the Sira (biography of Mohammed), the Hadith (the sayings of Mohammed), the Tafsir(commentaries on the Qur’an) and the Tarikh (histories of Mohammed) all were written 200-300 years after Mohammed. However, Dr. Jay Smith has demonstrated that these supporting documents were written much later (11th-16th centuries), 400-900 years after Mohammed presumably lived, and then redacted or attributed back to the 7th-10th centuries. [24]Most of these documents were not canonized into written form until 1,200 – 1,270 years later than Mohammed.
For example, the Sira (biography of Mohammed), was comprised of 36 different biographies written down in the last few hundred years. But who wrote the standard work which Islam depends upon today? It was Heinrich Ferdinand Wustenfeld (1808 – 1899), who between 1858 – 1860 compiled the Sira taken from libraries and museums in six mostly European cities (Fez, London, Oxford, Dublin, Paris and London). [25] It was then translated into French and English, and “sanitized” by Alfred Guillaume [26] and others later on. Hence, the man whom Muslims are dependent on to know who their prophet is or what he did, is an elderly German linguist who wrote Mohammed’s story over 160 years ago. [27]
Furthermore, Islam claims that the Hadith (sayings of Mohammed) were created in the 9th-10th centuries, but this does not align with history. Their earliest extant manuscripts were actually created much later: [28] Abu Dawud: 11thcentury (400 years after Mohammed); An-Nasai: 12th century (500 years after Mohammed); Ibn Majah: 13th century (600 years after Mohammed); Jami’ At-Tirmidhi: 14th century (700 years after Mohammed); Sahih Muslim: 14thcentury (700 years Mohammed); Sahih Bukhari: 14th – 15th centuries (700-800 years after Mohammed). Not one of the Hadith was compiled in the 9th – 10th centuries. Their final extant manuscripts were not created until the 11th -15th centuries, which is 400 – 800 years later! Thus, not one of them ever heard a word Mohammed said!
What about Al Tabari’s Tafsir (commentaries on the Qur’an) and Ta’rikh (histories of Mohammed)? The edition of Al Tabari which everyone uses today was compiled by Michael Jan De Geoje, the professor of Arabic at Leiden University, Holland, between 1879 – 1901, and is known as the “Leiden Edition.” Yet, De Goeje used two 13th century Arabic manuscripts from Turkey as his model. So, even Al Tabari’s Ta’rikh and his Tafsir are not 10th century originals but are much later 13th century compilations which were merely redacted or attributed back to Al Tabari 300 years earlier. Yet, they are still 600 years later than Mohammed! What’s more, it took a Dutch scholar to compile them 1,200 years later! [29]
Another problem with the Muslim documentary evidence for the Qur’an has to do with distance and direction (see above map). [30] The Islamic Traditions say that everything happened in Mecca and Medina (circled in green on the map above), in west central Arabia. Mohammed was born in Mecca and lived there 52 years before he moved to Medina in 622 A.D. It was while he lived in Mecca and Medina that he received the Qur’an from 610 – 632 A.D. Yet everything we know about Mohammed did not come from those cities, it came from Baghdad, which is 1200 miles too far north.
Ibn Hisham, who wrote Mohammed’s biography (the Sira), is from Basra, but he grew up in Cairo and wrote in Baghdad. Cairo is 990 miles from Mecca. And Basra is 1200 miles from Mecca as is Baghdad. Sahih Bukhari who wrote down the sayings of Mohammed (the Hadith), is from Bukhara which is 2,6000 miles from Mecca. Al Tabariwho wrote down the commentaries of the Qur’an and the histories of Mohammed (The Tafsir & Tarikh) is from Tabaristan (northern Iran today) which is 1,7000 miles from Mecca. None of these traditional writers lived or worked in Mecca or Medina. They were too far to the north from Mecca and came from east and west of Baghdad.
Since these Muslim sources are much too late and too far away to provide confirmation of the reliability of the Qur’an, we must go back to the seventh century when Mohammed lived to determine what documents are available which can substantiate the reliability of the Qur’an.
2) The Doctrina Iacobi and 661 Chronicler: There are two seventh century documents outside the Islamic Traditions which are available for us to examine today which are helpful for our purposes here. Both of these documents deal with the relationship between the Arabs and the Jews. The first is the Doctrina Iacobi, the earliest witness of Mohammed and his “movement” available to us outside Islamic tradition. It is a Greek Christian polemical tract, from Carthage (Tunis), but written in Palestine, by a Christian apologist between 634 and 640 A.D. [31] The second is a chronicle supposedly written by the historian Bishop Sebeos in 660 A.D. [32]
The Qur’an implies that Mohammed’s relationship with the Jews was becoming unfavorable in 624 A.D. (or soon after the Hijra in 622 A.D.), and thus moved the direction of prayer, the Qibla at that time, from Jerusalem to Mecca, “144 Indeed, we have seen you turning your face toward the heaven. So we will have you turn to a direction which will please you. So turn your face toward the forbidden mosque [Masjid ul Haraam at Mecca]… 149 And from whatever place you come out, so turn your face toward the forbidden mosque and surely to the truth from your lord. And Allah is not unaware of what you do. 150 And from whatever place you come out, so turn your face toward the forbidden mosque, and wherever you were, to that part so turn your faces lest people have an excuse against you except those who are unjust among them. So do not fear them. And fear me that I may complete my grace on you, and perhaps you may be guided.” (Qur’an 2:144, 149-150). [33] In these verses Allah instructs Mohammed and his followers to turn toward the forbidden mosque in Mecca away from the mosque in Jerusalem, implying that relations between the Jews and Arabs were severed or at the least, strained.
In contrast to this, an early non-Muslim source describes a healthy relationship between the Muslims and Jews at the time of the first conquests (late 620s A.D.), and even later. Yet the Doctrina Iacobi warns of the Jews who mixed with the Saracens (Arabs), and the danger of falling into the hands of these Jews and Saracens(Arabs). [34] In fact, this relationship seems to continue on into the conquest of Palestine as an early Armenian source mentions that the governor of Jerusalem in the aftermath of the conquest was a Jew. [35] It is plausible that the Jews and Arabs (Saracens) seem to be allied together during the time of the conquest of Palestine and even for a short time after. [36] If these witnesses are correct, then one must ask how it is that the Jews and Saracens (Arabs) are allies as late as 640 A.D., when, according to the Qur’an, Mohammed dissolved his ties with the Jews as early as 624 A.D., more than 15 years earlier?
To answer that we need to refer to the earliest connected account of the career of Mohammed that is found in an Armenian chronicle from around 660 A.D., which is attributed by some to Bishop Sebeos. [37]The chronicler describes how Mohammed established a community which comprised both Ishmaelites (i.e. Arabs) and Jews, and that their unifying motivation was their common descent from Abraham: the Arabs through Ishmael, and the Jews through Isaac. [38] The chronicler believed Mohammed had bestowed both communities with a birthright to the Holy Land, while concurrently providing them with a monotheist genealogy. [39]
Hence, we find non-Muslim documentary sources contradicting the Qur’an, maintaining that there was a good relationship between the Arabs and Jews for at least an additional 15 years beyond that which the Qur’an alleges. Also, if Palestine was the focus for the Arabs, then the city of Mecca comes into question, and additional documentary evidence concerning Mecca may prove to be the most detrimental proof against the reliability of the Qur’an which we have to date.
Islam maintains that Mecca is the oldest and best-known city in history. The Qur’an makes inferences to Mecca on its pages. The word “Mecca” is not mentioned in the following Qur’anic verses, but Islam understands them to refer to the city.Meccais where Adam and Eve were thrown down from heaven after they ate from the tree (Qur’an 7:24). We cannot find a city older than Adam and Eve, so Mecca is believed by Islam to be the oldest city. The first sanctuary appointed for humankind was that at “Becca,” understood by Islam to refer to Mecca (Qur’an 3:96). Mecca is the “mother of the villages” (Qur’an 6:92; 42:7). According to the Qur’an it was Abraham and Ishmael who built the Meccan Ka’aba (Qur’an 2:125-127). Mecca is where Abraham lived in 1900 B.C. when he destroyed the idols within the Ka’aba (Qur’an 21:51-71). Much of Mohammed’s story revolves around Mecca. He was born there in 570 A.D. and spent his formative years there until 622 A.D. when he fled to Medina. He returned to Mecca in 630 A.D. and took control of it. Mecca became the center for the Qibla (direction of prayer) in 624 A.D. (Qur’an 2:149-150). And Mecca is the center of trade North, South, East and West. [41] These all suggest that people have lived in Mecca from the very beginning of humankind.
Yet, the only clear reference to the word “Mecca” in the Qur’an is in one verse: “And he is who holds back their hands from you and your hands from them in the belly [valley] of Mecca after he had given you triumph over them, and Allah was seer of what you do.” (Qur’an 48:24). [42] [emphasis added] If Mecca is such an important place, why is it only mentioned once in the Qur’an? Doesn’t this signify that Mecca either was not that important to the author(s) of the Qur’an or it did not come into existence until later on?
However, when we look at the 9th and 10th century Islamic Traditions (which are actually 11th – 15th century), we see many references to the city of Mecca because they are written much later. [43] Mecca was in a valley and a parallel valley (Ibn Hisham; Al Bukhari 2:645, 2:685, 3:891, 2:815, 2:820, 4:227) with a stream (Al Bukhari 2:685), fields, (Al Bukhari 9:337), trees (Sahih al-Tirmidhi 1535), grass (Al Bukhari 9:337), fruit (Al Bukhari 4:281), clay and loam (Al Tabari VI 1079 p. 6), grain, palm trees, dates, olives, pomegranates (Qur’an 6:99, 141; 16:11, 67), with mountains overlooking the Ka’aba (Ibn Hisham; Al Bukhari 2:645, 2:685, 3:891, 2:815, 2:820, 4:227), where the pagans raised livestock (Qur’an 4:119). Mecca is described as a very fertile place in the Islamic Traditions and in the Qur’an.
Yet, Townsend states that the physical and geographical features of Mecca do not line up with the Qur’an or the Hadith.[44] For example, “the mountains of Safa and Marwah, which mark the journey of Hagar in her quest for water, do not fit with the description in the Hadith. They are too small and close to each other. Also, the Hadith references to Mecca describe a place where the soil is suitable to grow fields of grain, trees, and grapevines. However, Mecca does not have olive trees, and it cannot even support the growth of food for camels and sheep. The Hadith also talks about two parallel valleys with a stream in between, but Mecca does not have these features. However, all of these features are found in the ancient city of Petra,” [45] much farther north from Mecca. Mecca is in a desert (see above pics), so it is too arid and dry to support the descriptions of fertility found in the Qur’an and Hadith, according to modern soil studies! [46] Mecca has never had the kind of fertility that these Islamic traditions claim.
From research carried out by both Crone and Cook, except for an inference to a city called “Makoraba” by the Greco-Egyptian geographer Ptolemy in the mid-2nd century A.D. (though it is not certain this allusion by Ptolemy referred to Mecca, as he only mentioned the name in passing), there is absolutely no other report of Mecca or its Ka’bain any authenticated ancient document; that is until the mid-eighth century, [47] when Mecca is mentioned in the Continuatio Byzantia Arabica, which is a source dating around 741 A.D. [48] In addition, Mecca is not even found on a map until around 900 A.D.[49]
Dr. Crone visited several surrounding civilizations such as the Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Roman, Nabataeans, Qedarite, Himyarite, and Nubian civilizations, etc. (see red circle and rectangle areas on above map), and read their ancient documents and she could not find one reference to Mecca.[50] So, Crone visited the lesser-known towns closer to Mecca on the Arabian Western Plateau which were oases, and she found they were well-known and well documented all the way back to 300 B.C., yet she did not find one mention of Mecca (see above map). [51] Townsend agreed with Crone’s findings, stating that there is no primary source evidence of the existence of an ancient city in the present location of Mecca. [52] He observed that there are numerous mentions of Ta’if, just 70 miles away, as well as Najran, Sana’a, Medina, and Petra – but no mention of Mecca. There is even an absence of the name of Mecca in the ancient inscriptions found in the records of cities that occupied the Arabian Peninsula. [53] If Mecca was known as the “mother of the villages [cities]” as the Qur’an states (Qur’an 6:92; 42:7), then surely there would be documents from the 7th century, or earlier, that would mention the city as well as the people.
Even more problematic for Islam which claims that Mecca was the center of trading routes for Arabia in the 7th century and before, is that there is not any reference to trade with Mecca in the records of that time. [54] Patricia Crone did extensive research on the Meccan trade routes, and she learned that the ancient trading documents of that time referred to less significant towns close to Mecca, including Ta’if (which is south-east of Mecca), Yathrib (later Medina), as well as Khaybar, Petra, and Mamre in the north and Ma’rib, Sana’a, and Najran in the south (see above map), but no mention is made of Mecca from the 2nd to 8th centuries. [55]
When we note the trade route through these towns (which were oases), we find that they are all located on the Western Plateau of the Arabian Peninsula, while Mecca is over 3,000 feet down below it in a desert, proving it was not on any trade route (see map above). [56]
In addition, when Dr. Crone went to the Red Sea trade routes, she found that it was all along the East African coast, but not on the Arabian coast (see above map), proving none of the trade went through Mecca at all, confronting the notion that it was the center of trade.
Mecca, before 741 A.D. (which is considered the earliest documentary evidence for it anywhere), simply has no history, and even that reference is in Southern Turkey, which is too far north. When Ptolemy in the 2nd century wrote his book on Arabian geography,he never listed Mecca, so that none of the earliest 15th-16th century European maps of Arabia have Mecca listed on them either.
The reason for this is because Mecca was in the middle of a dessert and had no water. Trade needs people, and people need water, food and towns, all of which never existed in Mecca until the mid 8th century, over 100 years after Islam was supposedly created. Because of Mecca’s water problem, Queen Zubaydah’s Aqueduct was built in 801 A.D. (see upper left pic above), which then had to be refurbished 9 times in the subsequent 974 years due to the overbearing need for drinkable water; and then finally it was replaced with desalination plants after 1926 A.D. [57]
Islam claims that Allah miraculously provides “inexhaustible water” for 2 billion Muslims through the ZamZam well, which is currently only 3-9 feet across and 100 feet deep, and about 66 feet east of the Ka’aba in Mecca (see above middle pic). [58] But what they don’t tell you is that the ZamZam well gets all its water from desalination plants built by American and European companies. (see lower right pic above) [59]
Linguists have observed that theArabic word endings used in the Qur’an do not come from Mecca, but from Nabataean Aramaic, which is situated 600 miles farther north around the city of Petra (see above pic). [60]Geographically speaking, the Qur’an places fifty-four of its sixty-five referenced areas 600 – 1,000 miles farther north from Mecca (Ad = 23 times, Thamud = 24 times, and Midian = 7 times) suggesting the authors of the Qur’an came from much farther north in northern Arabia closer to the city of Petra (see above map). [61] Whoever wrote the Qur’an wrote from farther north where these places existed.
Islam contends that between 70 – 300 prophets were buried in Mecca in a kneeling position so they could keep praying, so we should be able to find them today. Yet, with all the skyscrapers being constructed there in recent years, requiring deep foundations, they have not yet dug up one prophet’s body. Smith concludes that it seems the Saudi Arabians, because of Mecca’s lack of history, are cementing up all the evidence, suggesting even they are either skeptical of its history or they don’t want the rest of the world to find out the truth about Islam’s origin (see above pic). [62]
Conclusion: Townsend, the author of The Mecca Mystery, concludes, “To put it as bluntly as possible: there is not a single shred of uncontested primary source evidence confirming the existence of an ancient city at the spot where the modern city of Mecca is located.” [63]
The documentary evidence not only contradicts the Qur’an’s dating on the split between the Arabs and the Jews, but it also contradicts both the Qur’an and the Hadith’s description of the city it identifies as the birthplace and cornerstone for Islam. The standard Islamic tradition refers to Mecca as a place with much vegetation, existing since Adam and Eve, and with up to 300 prophets buried there. Yet, it is not referred to until 741 A.D., and none of the early maps show Mecca at all. Not one prophet’s body has been discovered buried in Mecca. Scholars such as Patricia Crone examined the ancient historical and trading documents, and Mecca was not the great commercial center the later Muslim traditions would have us believe, as it was not known by the people who lived and wrote from that period of time. In fact, history shows that what the Qur’an and Hadith describe could not even qualify as a viable city during the time of Mohammed, and it certainly could not have been the center of the Muslim world at that time. In addition, research has debunked the Red Sea Trade via Arabia, proving it was all via Africa, because it had water and Mecca did not. None of the surrounding empires ever heard of Mecca, most likely because it lacked WATER.
How then can we believe that the Qur’an is reliable? Do these same types of problems exist with the Bible? Let’s turn our attention to…
The Bible’s Documentary Evidence
For the last several decades the documentary evidence for the reliability of the Bible has been an area of research which has increased rapidly. But this hasn’t always been so. The assumption by many former archaeologists was that the Old Testament was not written in the 10th – 14th centuries B.C. by the authors described within its text, but by later Jewish historians during the much later 2nd – 6th centuries B.C., and that the stories were then redacted or attributed back onto the great prophets such as Moses and David, etc. Yet, an enormous quantity of historical data has been uncovered and is continuing to be uncovered, as well as the new forensic research methods being employed to study them, so that many of these preconceived notions of authorship are simply no longer valid. For instance:
1)The oldest book of the Bible is considered to be Job which conservative scholars believe was written during the Patriarchal period of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (2100 -1900 B.C.). The following internal evidence confirms that Job was written during this period of time:[64]
a. Job’s wealth was reckoned in livestock (Job 1:3; 42:12), which was also true of Abraham (Gen. 12:16; 13:2) and Jacob (Gen. 30:43; 32:5).
b. The Sabeans and Chaldeans (Job 1:15, 17) were nomads in Abraham’s time, but in later years they were not nomadic.
c. The Hebrew word qeśîtâh, translated “piece of silver” (Job 42:11), is used elsewhere only twice (Gen. 33:19; Josh. 24:32), both times in reference to Jacob.
d. Job’s daughters were heirs of his estate along with their brothers (Job 42:15). This, however, was not possible later under the Mosaic Law if a daughter’s brothers were still living (Num. 27:8).
e. Literary works similar in some ways to the Book of Job were written in Egypt and Mesopotamia around the time of the patriarchs.
f. Several names of people and places in the book of Job were also associated with the patriarchal age. Examples include (Sheba, a grandson of Abraham (Gen. 25:3), and the Sabeans from Sheba (Job 1:15; 6:19); Tema, another grandson of Abraham (Gen. 25:15), and Tema, a location in Arabia (Job 6:19); Eliphaz, a son of Esau (Gen. 36:4), and Eliphaz, one of Job’s companions (Job 2:11); Uz, a nephew of Abraham (Gen. 22:21), and Uz, where Job lived (Job 1:1).
The documentary evidence for the Patriarchal period includes four sets of tablets which have been and are continuing to be uncovered from that area of the world. They demonstrate that the Biblical account is indeed historically reliable. Let’s briefly look at all five sets of tablets (see above pics): [65]
Armana Letters: (from Egypt) mention the Habiru or Apiru in Hebrew, which was first applied to Abraham in Genesis 14:13 and the name “Job” (Ayyabum).
Egyptian Execration Texts: These mention the names of people and places found in the book of Job: Sheba (Job 6:19), Tema and Eliphaz (Job 2:11; 4:1; 15:1; 22:1; 42:7, 9); Uz and Job (Job 1:1).
Ebla tablets: 1,800 tablets from Tel Mardikh (Northern Syria), dating from 2500-2250 B.C., [66] shows us that a thousand years before Moses, laws, customs and events were recorded in writing in that part of the world, and that the judicial proceedings and case laws were very similar to the Deuteronomy law code (i.e., Deuteronomy 22:22-30 codes on punishment for sex offenses). One tablet mentions and lists the five cities of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiimand Zoar in the exact sequence which we find in Genesis 14:8! Until these tablets were uncovered, the existence of Sodom and Gomorrah had always been in doubt by historians.
Mari Archives: (from the Euphrates) mentions king Arriyuk, or Arioch of Genesis 14, and lists the towns of Nahor and Haran (from Genesis 24:10), as well as the names Benjamin and Habiru. They also mention the names Sheba, Eliphaz, Uz, and Job in the book of Job.
Nuzi tablets: (from Iraq) speaks about a number of customs which we find in the Pentateuch (i.e., Genesis – Deuteronomy) such as:
1. a barren wife giving a handmaiden to her husband (i.e., Hagar)
2. a bride chosen for the son by the father (i.e., Rebekah)
3. a dowry paid to the father-in-law (i.e., Jacob)
4. work done to pay a dowry (i.e., Jacob)
5. the unchanging oral will of a father (i.e., Isaac)
6. a father giving his daughter a slave-girl (i.e., Leah, Rachel)
7. the sentence of death for stealing a cult god (i.e., Jacob).
2) The Pentateuch (i.e. Genesis – Deuteronomy): In years past, skeptics contended that the Pentateuch could not have been written by Moses during his lifetime (ca. 1525-1405 B.C.),[67] because there was no evidence of any writing that early. Then the Black Stele was found in Susa (modern Iran) in 1901 with the detailed laws of Babylonian King Hammurabi which were written approximately 300 years before Moses, and in the same region. [68]
3) The Masoretic Text: There was also a lot of doubt about the reliability of the Old Testament documents, since the oldest manuscript in our possession was the Masoretic Text, written in 916 A.D. Skeptics asked how we can depend on a collection of writings whose earliest manuscripts are so recent? Then in 1947 came the amazing discoveries of the Dead Sea Scrolls in the caves of Qumran and along the Dead Sea written around 125 B.C. These scrolls show us that outside of minute copying errors it is identical to the Masoretic Text and yet it predates it by over 1,000 years! [69] We have further substantiation in the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew text, which was composed around 250-150 B.C. [70]
4) Available Christian documents: When we analyzed the Qur’an’s documentary evidence, we looked first at the Muslim documents. In the same manner, I want to look at the Christian documents now. In the above chart, [71] we list Christianity’s emergence according to our Traditions. When we look at the documentary evidence for Jesus, we start with the first Sira (biography of Jesus) and Hadith (sayings of Jesus) written by Luke from 60-62 A.D., [72] just 27-29 years after Jesus died. Then the book of Acts which is our Tahrikh or early histories of the church also written by Luke between 60-62 A.D., [73] likewise 27-29 years after the death of Christ. The apostle Paul’s letters to the churches are the Tafsir or commentaries on the life of Jesus between 49-64 A.D., [74] only 16-31 years after Jesus’ death. Next, we have the second Sira (biography of Jesus) and Hadith (sayings of Jesus) written by Mark (68-69 A.D.), [75] just 35-36 years after Christ’s death. Then we have Matthew’s Sira (biographies of Jesus) and Hadith (sayings of Jesus) written between 50-70 A.D, [76] only 17 – 37 years after the crucifixion of Jesus. And finally, we have the last Sira and Hadith written by John in 90 A.D., [77] just 57 years after the death of Jesus. Hence, within 16-57 years after Christ’s death, we have the entire New Testament. All of the New Testament writers lived in the same place Jesus lived, and they either knew Him personally, or they got their material from others who saw what He did and heard what He said.
5) Available non-Christian documents: As an example, let’s look at the crucifixion of Christ, the most important event in history (see chart above). [78] The Qur’an, which Islam claims was written in the mid-7th century, says, “And their saying, ‘Surely we killed the Christ ‘Isā, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.’ And they did not kill him, and they did not salaba [crucify] him; but it was made to appear to them, and surely those who disagree about him are in doubt of him. They do not have any knowledge of him except following the conjecture, and they did not kill him for certain.”(Qur’an 4:157). [79] [emphasis added] The Qur’an denies that their Jesus (‘Isā) actually died on the cross. It says it was made to appear he died by having another man take Christ’s place on the cross. Is the Qur’an’s claim supported by the historical documentary evidence from the 1st and 2nd centuries A.D. outside of Christianity? No.
Thallus, a Greek Samaritan historian writing about 52 A.D. spoke of the “darkness which accompanied the crucifixion of Christ.”[80]Josephus, the first-century Jewish historian (37-100 A.D.), [81] wrote that “there was a wise man who was called Jesus…. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die.” [82]Lucian, a Greek Satirist from the 2nd century A.D., “without using Jesus’ name he writes of that one whom they still worship today, the man in Palestine who was crucified because he brought this new form of initiation into the world.” [83]There is also a Syriac manuscript in the British Museum by a Syrian and probably Stoic philosopher, Mara Bar Serapion(sometime after 70 A.D), that asks, “What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their king? It was just after that their kingdom was abolished.”[84] The Roman historian, Tacitus (56-120 A.D.), spoke in his Annals of “Christ who was executed under Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberias.” [85]Most of these Greek, Roman, and Jewish 1st and 2nd century historians were opposed to Christianity, yet they all agree that Jesus Christ was crucified on a cross.
Who are we going to believe? The Qur’an, which Islam claims was written in the mid-7th century, over 600 years after Jesus walked on the earth, or these 1st and 2nd century Greek, Roman, and Jewish writers who lived much closer to the time of Jesus? We can see from this one example that Christianity has a much better historical record than does Islam.
Conclusion:
When we compare the historical documentary evidence of the Qur’an and the Bible (see above chart), we discover when the earliest biographies and sayings for both faiths were written. For Christianity, they were written 16-57 years after Jesus’ death on the cross by those from the same area. But for Islam, they were written 400-900 years later, and by those who were hundreds of miles too far north. Which do you think has more authority and reliability?
A former Muslim who became a Christian, writes, “After thoroughly investigating the truth claims of slam and Christianity, even while a Muslim, there was no avoiding the obvious truth: The evidence in favor of Christianity was far, far stronger than the evidence for Islam….
“The traditional Islamic narrative is incompatible with both the history of Christianity and even with its own historical records. To believe in the Islamic account of Christian origins while taking the historical records seriously, we would have to conclude that Jesus was an utterly incompetent Messiah and Allah is a deceptive God. The historical record of Islamic origins makes many scholars wonder whether Muhammad existed, and it makes scholars think the Quran was originally far more fluid and indeed a very different kind of book than it is today.
“The Islamic narratives of Christian origins, and even of Islamic origins, are incompatible with history. In other words, to believe the truth of Islam is to ignore the historical evidence.
“As a Muslim, I wanted to base my beliefs not on blind faith, not on what appealed to me, and not even on my family’s heritage. I wanted to ground my faith in reality. If I wanted to take the records of history seriously, I had to abandon my Islamic faith and accept the gospel.” [86][emphasis added]
As Christians, we have the evidence to boldly and clearly proclaim Christ crucified to our Muslim friends. For centuries, the truth of Christianity has withstood criticism. In the first century, when one of Jesus’ disciples, Thomas, doubted the eyewitness testimony of Jesus’ resurrection (John 20:25) and demanded tangible evidence that Christ was alive before he would believe it. Jesus did not come to Thomas and tell him not to doubt or question such an important event. Instead, Christ says to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.” (John 20:27). Knowing full well the struggles going on in Thomas’ heart, Jesus invites him to explore with his hands (“Reach your finger here”) and his eyes (“look at My hands”) the reality of His resurrection body.
When Jesus said, “reach your hand here, and put it into My side,” He was referring to a literal hole in His side that was left by the spear. It had healed over but it left an obvious impression. Jesus did not condemn Thomas for his unbelief. He didn’t say, “You should not ask questions like that Thomas!” Christ gave Thomas undeniable evidence that He rose from the dead to answer his objection and then invites him to believe.
In our Judeo-Christian America, we are taught to think critically and question truth claims. Truth does not pull away from scrutiny. It stands up to it.
But in an Islamic community, you are to respect the Qur’an and not question it. The Qur’an encourages Muslims not to question it, lest they become “infidels” (non-Muslims): “101 O you who have believed, do not ask about things which, if they were revealed to you, it would be harmful to you. And if you ask of it when the Qur’an is sent down, it will be revealed to you. Allah will pardon you for this. And Allah is forgiving, forbearing. 102 The people before you asked such questions, and by them they became infidels.” (Qur’an 5:101-102).[87]
Dakdok comments about these verses, “What a way to understand the Qur’an! Just don’t ask questions because, if you ask, perhaps you won’t find an answer. On the other hand, if you do find the answer and it contradicts the teaching of the Qur’an, then perhaps you will become an infidel (unbeliever).
“Christians, on the other hand, are encouraged to ask questions and seek further understanding, which is one of the primary reasons that we have Bible study classes. In them, we can investigate and search for answers to all kinds of questions, and these answers are in the Word of God. Perhaps the greatest problem that Muslims face is the necessity to believe in a book, which in many cases they have not read, but whether they have or not, they simply cannot understand. As it is even written in its own pages, no one can even interpret it, except Allah himself!” [88][emphasis added]
As Islam spreads throughout the U.S., it is essential that Christians speak the truth in love to Muslims about Islam and Christianity. When western scholars and followers of Christ ask questions about the Qur’an, Mohammed, and Mecca, Islamists will be confronted with the truth about their faith and its incompatibility with history. It is then, that we must share the good news of Jesus’ death and resurrection with them so they “may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing [they]… may have life in His name.” (John 20:31).
ENDNOTES:
[1] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Daniel, 2025 Edition, pp. 6, 40.
[2] Conservative scholars believe Job was written during the Patriarchal period (2100 -1900 B.C.). See Roy B. Zuck, “Job,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary Wisdom, 2018 Kindle Edition, pp. 15-16.; Tom Constable, Notes on Job, 2025 Edition, pp. 1-2.
[3] Robert Vacendak, “Revelation,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 1944-1945; John F. Walvoord, “Revelation,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary Epistles and Prophecy, 2018 Kindle locations 4701 to 4707; Archibald Thomas Robertson, A. T. Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament, 2014 Kindle Locations 211099 -211108.
[4] Much of this section is adapted from Dr. Jay Smith’s July 9, 2025, video presentation at Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, entitled, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com, unless otherwise noted. View video at this LINK .
[5] Norman L. Geisler and Abdul Saleeb, Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the CrossSecond Ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1993, 2002), pg. 94; Daniel Janosik, THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM: What Every Christian Needs to Know About Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam (Cambridge, OH: Christian Publishing House, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 33-34 cites Ali Dashti, Twenty-Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad (Mazda, 1994), pp. 47-58. Usama Dakdok, THE GENEROUS QUR’AN, 2009 Smashwords Edition, pp. 5-10. Dakdok notes that the surahs written in Mecca include surahs 1, 6- 7, 10-12, 14-21, 23, 25-32, 34-46, 50-54, 56, 67-75, 77-97, 100-109, 111-114. The surahs written in Medina include surahs 2-5, 8-9, 13, 22, 24, 33, 47-49, 55, 57-66, 76, 98-99, 110.
[6] Map is adapted from Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[7] Geisler and Saleeb, Answering Islam, pg. 75 cites Andrew Rippin and Jan Knappert, eds. and trans., Textual Sources for the Study of Islam(Manchester: University Press, 1986)), pp. 68-72; Arthur Jeffery, Islam: Muhammad and His Religion (Indianapolis and New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1958), pp. 35-46; and John Alden Williams, Islam (New York: George Braziller, 1962), pp. 66-69.
[9] Walter Martin, The Kingdom of the Cults: The Definitive Work on the Subject 6th Edition (Bloomington, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 2019 Kindle Edition), pp. 523-524.
[10] Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[14] Daniel Janosik, THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM: What Every Christian Needs to Know About Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam (Cambridge, OH: Christian Publishing House, 2019 Kindle Edition), pg. 21.
[16] Ibid., pp. 21-22; cf. Nabeel Qureshi, No God but One: Allah or Jesus? A Former Muslim Investigates the Evidence For Islam And Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2016 Kindle Edition), pp. 261, 312 cites Ibn Hisham’s notes in The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah, trans. Alfred Guillaume (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002), pg. 691.
[17] Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[31] S. P. Brock, “Syriac Views of Emergent Islam,” Studies on the First Century of Islamic Society, edited by G.H.A. Juynboll (Carbondale, So. Ill. Univ. Press, 1982), pg. 9; Patricia Crone and Michael Cook, Hagarism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977), pg. 3.
[32] Crone and Cook, Hagarism (1977), pg. 6; Bishop Sebeos, Histoire d’Heraclius, tr. F. Macler (Paris, 1904), pp. 94-96.
[33] Verses taken from Usama K. Dakdok, THE GENEROUS QUR’AN: An Accurate, Modern English Translation of the Qur’an, Islam’s Holiest Book (Venice, FL: Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC, 2009 Smashwords Edition), pp. 60-61. Used by permission of Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC.
[34] N. Bonwetsch, (ed.), “Doctrina Iacobi nuper baptizati,” in Abhandlungen der Koniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen,Philologisch-historische Klasse N.s., vol. xii (Berlin, 1910), pg. 88; Michael Cook, Muhammad (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983), pg. 75.
[35] K.R. Patkanean (ed.), Patmout’iun Sebeosi Episkoposi i Herakln (St. Petersburg, 1879), pg. 111; Bishop Sebeos, Histoire d’Heraclius, tr. F. Macler (Paris, 1904), pg. 103.
[40] Much of this section is adapted from Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com, unless otherwise noted.
[41] W. Montgomery Watt, Muhammad at Mecca (London: Oxford University Press, 1953), pp. 2-4.
[42] Verse taken from Usama K. Dakdok, THE GENEROUS QUR’AN: An Accurate, Modern English Translation of the Qur’an, Islam’s Holiest Book (Venice, FL: Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC, 2009 Smashwords Edition), pg. 700. Used by permission of Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC.
[43] Adapted from Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[44] Janosik, THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 321 cites Peter Townsend, The Mecca Mystery: Probing the Black Hole at the Heart of Muslim History (Peter Townsend, 2018), pg. 50.
[45] Ibid., pp. 55-56 cites Townsend, The Mecca Mystery (2018),pp. 110-113.
[46] Dan Gibson, Qur’anic Geography:A Survey and Evaluation of the Geographical References in the Qur’an with Suggested Solutions for Various Problems and Issues (Canada: Independent Scholars Press, 2011), pg. 233.
[47] Cook, Muhammad (1983), pg. 74; Crone and Cook, Hagarism (1977), pg. 22.
[48] Ibid., pp. 54-55 cites Robert Hoyland, Seeing Islam as Others Saw It (Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press, 1997), pp. 43-44;
[55] Patricia Crone, Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam (Princeton University Press, 1987), pp. 7, 11, 41-42; cf. Townsend, The Mecca Mystery (2018), pg. 49.
[56] Jay Smith, “The Bible and The Qur’an – An Historical Comparison,” at www.pfandercenter.org cites R.W. Bulliet, The Camel and the Wheel (Cambridge, Mass., 1975), pg. 105; N. Groom, Frankincense and Myrrh, a Study of the Arabian Incense Trade (London, 1981), pg. 193; W.W. Muller, “Weibrauch…,” off-print: Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyclopadie, Supplement and 15 (Munich, 1978), pg. 723. You can view Smith’s article at this Link.
[57] Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[58] Retrieved on December 7, 2025, from a Wikipedia article entitled, “ZamZam Well,” at www.en.wikipedia.org.
[59] Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[60] Janosik, THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 57 cites Robert Kerr, “The Language of the Koran,” Tingis Magazine, February 18, 2013 at https://www.tingismagazine.com/articles/the-language-of-the-koran/ and Mark Durie, The Qur’an and its Biblical reflexes: Investigations into the Genesis of a Religion (Rowman and Littlefield, 2018).
[61] Ibid., pg. 56 cites Townsend, The Mecca Mystery (2018), pg. 104 and Gibson, Qur’anic Geography (2011), pg. 137.
[62] Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[63] Janosik, THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 321 cites Peter Townsend, The Mecca Mystery (2018), pg. 48.
[64] The following is retrieved from Roy Zuck, “Job,” The Bible Knowledge Commentary Wisdom, 2018 Kindle Edition, pp. 15-16; cf. Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Job, 2025 Edition, pp. 1-2.
[65] Adapted from Smith, “The Bible and The Qur’an – An Historical Comparison,” at www.pfandercenter.org, unless otherwise noted.
[66] Norman Geisler and William E. Nix, From God To Us Revised and Expanded: How We Got Our Bible (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 1974, 2012 Kindle Edition), pg. 177.
[67] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Genesis, 2025 Edition, pg. 2.
[68] Retrieved on December 6, 2025, from the article entitled, “Code of Hammurabi,” at www.history.com.
[69] Josh McDowell and Sean McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2017 Kindle Edition), pp. 102-106; Geisler and Nix, From God To Us Revised and Expanded, 2012 Kindle Edition, pp. 201-203.
[70] Geisler and Nix, From God To Us Revised and Expanded, 2012 Kindle Edition, pp. 198-199.
[71] Adapted from Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[72] Alberto Samuel Valdez, “Luke,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 340.
[73] Alberto Samuel Valdez, “Acts,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 747.
[74] Robert Wilkin, “Galatians,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 1292-1293; Robert Wilkin, “2 Timothy,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 1557.
[75] Barry K. Mershon, “Mark,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 216-217.
[76] Hal Haller, Jr., “Matthew,” The Grace New Testament Commentary: Revised Edition, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 14.
[77] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on John, 2025 Edition, pp. 3-4.
[78] Adapted from Smith, July 9, 2025, “Two New Findings That Mohammed Didn’t Exist,” at www.youtube.com.
[79] Verse taken from Dakdok, THE GENEROUS QUR’AN: An Accurate, Modern English Translation of the Qur’an, Islam’s Holiest Book, 2009 Smashwords Edition, pg. 167. Used by permission of Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC.
[80] Geisler and Saleeb, Answering Islam, pg. 288 cite F.F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? (Chicago: Intervarsity Press, 1968), pg. 30
[81] McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World, 2017 Kindle Edition, pg. 84.
[82] Geisler and Saleeb, Answering Islam, pg. 288 cite Josephus, Antiquities, 18:63; See discussion in McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World, 2017 Kindle Edition, pp. 155-157.
[83] McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World, 2017 Kindle Edition, pg. 148 cites Robert E. Van Voorst, Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000), pg. 59.
[84] Geisler and Saleeb, Answering Islam, pg. 288 cite Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable (1968), pg. 31; for a more comprehensive treatment see, McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World, 2017 Kindle Edition, pp. 149-150 cite Darrell L. Bock, Studying the Historical Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2002), pg. 53.
[85] Geisler and Saleeb, Answering Islam, pg. 288 cites Tacitus, Annals 15:44 cited by Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable (1968), pg. 22; for a more comprehensive treatment see, McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World, 2017 Kindle Edition, pp. 150-153.
[86] Qureshi, No God but One: Allah or Jesus? 2016 Kindle Edition, pp. 290-291.
[87] Verses taken from Dakdok, THE GENEROUS QUR’AN: An Accurate, Modern English Translation of the Qur’an, Islam’s Holiest Book, 2009 Smashwords Edition, pg. 196.
[88] Excerpt from Usama K. Dakdok, Exposing the Truth about the Qur’an: The Revelation of Error, Volume 1 (Venice, FL: Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC, 2013 Smashwords Edition), pg. 15.
A comparison of the two largest faith communities in the world today
Introduction
I will never forget watching on TV the dreadful terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, that left nearly 3,000 people dead in New York City, Washington D.C., and Shanksville, PA. That night at an outdoor gathering of believers for prayer, it was eerie to look up at the sky and not see any airplanes. I thought to myself, will there be more attacks tonight or this week?
The televised images of death and destructiontook an emotional toll on many Americans, including this writer. Shock, sadness, fear, and anger were common emotional responses in the initial days following the attacks.
Just days after 9/11, then-President George W. Bush was concerned about possible repercussions against Muslims in the U.S., so he gave a speech to the Islamic Center in Washington, D. C., in which he declared: “Islam is peace.”[1] Similar words are echoed by many American Muslim scholars today who insist that Islam is a loving and peaceful religion.
“On September 20, 2001, President… Bush announced that the United States had declared war on ‘a radical network of terrorists and every government that supports them.’ The U.S. government initiated a Global War on Terror, sending troops to Afghanistan in October 2001 and later to Iraq.
“The 9/11 attacks prompted calls for new strategies to keep the nation safe. The USA PATRIOT Act, passed in October 2001, expanded the government’s intelligence-gathering tools and its ability to detain and deport immigrants suspected of terrorism. Many people continue to debate whether the methods used after 9/11 effectively protect national security without compromising civil liberties.[2]
The 9/11 attacks also continue to impact individuals’ health.“Immediately after the collapse of the Twin Towers, layers of thick gray dust and ash coated the site and surrounding areas. Days after the attack, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency declared the air in lower Manhattan safe, but the dust—made of destroyed building materials, industrial chemicals, and electronics mingled with jet fuel residue—was later determined to be hazardous.
“More than 400,000 survivors, first responders, rescue and recovery workers, cleaning crews, lower Manhattan residents, and others are estimated to have been exposed to these toxins on 9/11 or during the nine-month rescue and recovery operations at Ground Zero. Tens of thousands nationwide are now suffering from chronic illnesses, including respiratory diseases, mental health issues, and more than 100 different types of cancer. More than 2,000 of those exposed have died.” [3][emphasis added]
In January 2002, just months after the attacks, 83% of Americans said “defending the country from future terrorist attacks” was a top priority for the President and Congress, the highest for any issue. [4] But in a 2010 analysis by Pew Research Center, it was found that the share of Americans who were very concerned about another terrorist attack ranged from about 15% to roughly 25% since 2002. [5]
After 9/11, our “federal government moved quickly to develop a security framework to protect our country from large-scale attacks directed from abroad, while enhancing federal, state, and local capabilities to prepare for, respond to, and recover from threats and disasters at home. A key element of this framework included the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in March 2003, bringing together 22 separate agencies and offices into a single, Cabinet-level department.”[6]
Nearly 10 years after 9/11, plans were being made to have an Islamic cultural center (Park51 or Cordoba House), 2 ½ blocks from the location where the World Trade Center towers were destroyed by Islamist pilots. Plans leading up to the building of Park51 were confronted with resistance. On August 11, 2010, CNN released a poll showing 68% of Americans opposed the plan to build a mosque so close to where the World Trade Center used to stand, while 29% supported the plan. [7] Former Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Newt Gingrich said, “The name ‘Cordoba House’ is a deliberately insulting term that refers to Cordoba, Spain – the capital of Muslim conquerors who symbolized their victory over the Christian Spaniards by transforming a church there into the world’s third-largest mosque complex.”[8] [emphasis added]
Then-President Barack Obama stated: “As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan… This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.” [9] A year later, Park51’s doors were opened on September 21, 2011. [10]
No matter how much our federal government tried to protect our country from terrorism since 9/11, it failed to address the truth about Islam. Unfortunately, Christian churches are not discovering and teaching the truth about Islam either. More about that later.
I believe 9/11 was meant to be a wakeup call for America. Yes, there was an increase in Americans turning to religion and faith soon after that horrendous attack, but that was short-lived. We have failed to increase our knowledge about Islam which has left us more vulnerable to the real threat that Islam has become, “not only to Christianity but to freedom of religion in general, and to our very way of life.”[11]
As the prophet Hosea said, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”(Hosea 4:6). My prayer is that God will restore and strengthen His people as they grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ (2 Pet. 3:18), which includes knowing the truth about Islam.
The Rise of Islam in America
Islam and Christianity are the two largest faith communities in the world. Reports indicate that there are over 2.4 billion people who identify themselves as Christians worldwide (29% of the 8.24 billion total world population), [12] which includes Catholics (50%), Protestants (37%), Orthodox (12%), and “other” (1%). [13]
It is estimated that there are over 2.05 billion people around the world who identify themselves as Muslims, which represents over 25% of the world’s total population of 8.2 billion people. [14]The two largest denominations within Islam are Sunni Muslims (87-90%) and Shia Muslims (10-13%). [15] These two denominations arose over the political dispute as to whom should be the first successor (Caliph) to Mohammed, the founding prophet of Islam. The Sunni Muslims argued that Mohammed’s successor should be elected, but the Shia Muslims insisted that he must come from Mohammed’s bloodline. [16]
Shia Muslims believe that God has given in addition to the prophet Mohammed, an infallible guide in religious matters called an Imam from the direct bloodline of Mohammed. They argue that “the twelfth of the line of Imams did not die, as his enemies assert, but like the Qur’anic Jesus, he was taken by God from human sight, and is in occultation [concealed]. He will return to earth as the Mahdi, the awaited messianic figure who … will bring the triumph of religion and herald the last judgment.”[17] [brackets and emphasis added]
Many sources say that Islam is now the fastest growing religion in the world. For example, from 2010 to 2020, the number of Muslims increased by 347 million to 2.0 billion people, whereas Christians grew by 122 million to 2.3 billion. [18] Amazingly, Muslims added more people during the decade (347 million) than all non-Muslim religions combined (248 million). [19] The rate of Muslim growth was the highest in North America, where Muslims numbered 5.9 million in 2020 (up 52%). [20]
When you compare the birth rates of Muslim families in America to non-Muslim American families, you will notice that Islamic families are growing at a faster rate, with the exception of Mormon families (2.8). Muslim women average 2.76 children whereas the average birth rate of Protestant (2.11) and Catholic (2.10) women in America is lower. [21] The reason I bring attention to this is because history shows that when Islam becomes the majority population in a country or region, it will seek to bring the rest of the population of that country under Sharia Law or Islamic Law either by force or political advancement.
For example, twenty-four years after the worst Islamic terrorist attack took place on U.S. soil, there are currently 275 mosques in New York City alone, including the one near Ground Zero. [22] These mosques are teaching from the book (the Qur’an) which spawned the beliefs and hatred that led to this heinous terrorist attack on the city in 2001. Estimates of the number of Muslims in New York City range from 750,000 to over 1 million. [23]
New York City has allowed “mosques (masjids) to broadcast the Muslim call to prayer [Adhan] on Fridays between 12:30 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. without obtaining a permit and despite sound restrictions in city neighborhoods… [This] also allows the call to prayer to be broadcast in the evenings during Ramadan, the month-long period of fasting and prayer for the Muslim community.”[24] [brackets added]
Minneapolis, MN, was the first major city in America to broadcast the Muslim call to prayer five times per day,[25] starting at 3:30 a.m. and as late as 11 p.m. [26] Other cities that include the public broadcast of the Muslim call to prayer five times per day include Dearborn, MI; Hamtramck, MI (the first majority Muslim city in the U.S. [27]); and Astoria, New York. [28]
Think about this. We have pastors and priests, and even students in America that cannot pray acknowledging the God of the Bible at public school graduations or before football games using the P.A. system, but now we have Muslims who can use the P.A. system for their call to prayer across cities. [29]
What does this Muslim call to prayer say? This call to prayer is known as the Adhan which is Arabic for “to listen.” The call to prayer is in Arabic. Here is the English translation of the Arabic call to prayer:
Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! (Allah is bigger[30] [than your God]! Allah is bigger [than your God]!) Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! (Allah is bigger [than your God]! Allah is bigger [than your God]!)
Ashhadu an la ilaha illa Allah. (I bear witness that there is no god [worthy of worship] except Allah.) Ashhadu an la ilaha illa Allah. (I bear witness that there is no god [worthy of worship] except Allah.)
Ashadu anna Muhammadan Rasool Allah. (I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.) Ashadu anna Muhammadan Rasool Allah. (I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.)
Hayya ‘ala-s-Salah. Hayya ‘ala-s-Salah. (Hurry to the prayer. Hurry to the prayer.) Hayya ‘ala-l-Falah. Hayya ‘ala-l-Falah. (Hurry to success. Hurry to success.)
Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! (Allah is bigger [than your God]! Allah is bigger [than your God]!) La ilaha illa Allah. (There is no god [worthy of worship] except Allah.) [brackets added [31] ]
This Islamic call to prayer is intended to show “power and control over a country.” The Adhan declares the supremacy of the god of Islam known as Allah and is considered a “warlike declaration.”[32]
Usama Dakdok, an Egyptian born Christian who speaks fluent Arabic and has translated the Qur’an into English, states that the Arabic word ‘Akbar’ means ‘bigger’ not ‘great’.The phrase ‘Allahu Akbar’ cannot be taken from the life of the Muslim because it’s in every prayer. The shouting of this phrase was used by the founding prophet of Islam, Mohammed, and early Muslim jihadis to seize villages and cities. The use of ‘Allahu Akbar,’ meant that Allah is bigger than any other god or entity and it is used to strike terror in the hearts of individuals.[33]
Many terrorist attacks against non-Muslims include “Allahu akbar!” [“Allah is bigger or greater!”] being shouted by the attackers as a means of justifying or motivating their violent actions. Examples include a man on April 18, 2017, went on a shooting spree in Fresno, CA, murdering four men and during his arrest shouting, “Allahu akbar!”[34] A Canadian citizen stabbed a police officer in the back and neck while shouting “Allahu Adbar!” at an international airport in Flint, MI, in June 2017. [35] On October 31, 2017, a man rented a truck and drove it down a bike path in Lower Manhattan, New York, killing eight people and injuring a dozen others as he shouted, “Allahu Adbar!” [36] An orthodox Jewish man walking to his synagogue was shot in the back in Chicago, IL, by a man shouting “Allahu akbar!” on October 24, 2024. [37]
On August 27, 2025, a mass shooting took place at a Minneapolis Catholic School Mass, killing two schoolchildren and injuring at least 21 others. [38] The mass shooter left a series of videos online, including one video which consisted of several gun magazines (possibly used in the shooting) with written messages on them, including, “Donald Trump must die,” “6 million wasn’t enough” (a holocaust reference), “Israel must fall” (Naziism)and“Masha’allah,” an Arabic term meaning “what Allah has willed.” Anni Cyrus, born and raised in Iran, believes this mass shooter was a display of the Red-Green Axis[39] in action. She said that the mass shooter was not a convert or practicing Muslim but was a soldier of the Red-Green Axis. Why did this 23-year-old transgender man attack a Catholic School? Some think because he was a transgender and hated Donald Trump. But Cyrus believes he also attacked Catholics because Islam considers them to be infidels (i.e., non-Muslims). [40]
On June 24, 2025, the people of New York City chose in their primary elections an Islamic mayoral candidate to represent the Democratic party whose name is Zohran Kwame Mamdani.[41] [Editor’s Note: Mamdani won the mayoral election in November 2025 [42]] What you probably will not hear from mainstream media is that Mamdani is a Shia Muslim which is the same as the official state religion of Iran. He is a member of the most militant Muslim sect who believe their twelfth Imam, their Muslim Messiah, will come back during a time of great chaos here on earth to usher in judgment. The Shia Muslims’ mission is to hasten the return of this twelfth Imam, by creating maximum chaos through wars, revolutions, and terrorism. The Iranian regime is not politically motivated, but religiously motivated to cause trouble wherever they go. They seek to destroy Jews and Christians. [43]
Mamdani’s parents are anti-Israel activists. His mother, Mira Nair, is a filmmaker. His father, Mahmood Mamdani is a professor at Columbia University and participated in pro-Hamas rallies there recently. Mahmood works closely with people from the Liberation Road Socialists and the pro-Chinese Maoists, which started Black Lives Matter. Their son, Zohran, is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. These affiliations are leaders of the defund police and George Floyd movements. [44] If Mamdani is elected mayor of New York City, how will his leadership impact the morale of the New York City police department and the well-fare of its non-Muslim residents?
Like his parents, Zohran Mamdani, is an anti-Israel activist. He said he would have Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrested if he ever comes to New York City. [45] This mayoral hopeful also said he won’t condemn the globalizing of the Intifada [46] – an Arabic word meaning “uprising” and is used in reference to intense Palestinian protests against Israel, mainly in the form of violent terrorism. [47] He also said that Israel has no right to exist as a state. [48] Such statements are consistent with the hatred Islam has toward Israel.
New York City is not the only place where Islam is infiltrating. It is spreading across America. As of 2024, over 2,700 mosques exist in the United States of America.[49] A mosque is the place of worship and instruction for Muslims.
Bill Warner states that Christian universities are playing an important part in the Islamification of America.[50] Instead of teaching the truth about Islam, Christian universities are focusing on being nice to Muslims and avoiding conversations that would be uncomfortable for them. For example, Vanderbilt University’s Muslim Student Association (MSA) invited an FBI counter-terrorism expert to speak to the university. The student president of the MSA introduced himself saying that Islam had in essence won the state of Tennessee (which some used to call the “buckle” of the Bible belt), because evangelical and fundamental churches have accepted that Islam is a valid and true religion. He went on to say that all Muslims in Tennessee need to do now is to immigrate and have children, that the situation and future there were affirmed.
A former FBI agent who was a friend of Warner’s and accompanied him to this meeting, asked the FBI counter-terrorist expert if she had ever read the Qur’an. She replied, “No, but I have had some verses of the Qur’an explained to me.” Warner’s friend then asked, “Are you familiar with the Hadith [a written record of Mohammed’s words and actions]?” “No,” she replied. “Have you read the Sirah [biography or life journey of Mohammed]?” he asked. “No,” she answered. She said she knew a little about Sharia Law. “Basically,” Warner says, “what we have here is our ‘expert’ was profoundly ignorant.” [brackets added]
Warner then said, “Three days after 9/11, church phones began to ring and the message said, ‘Hello, I am Ahmed, and we would like to come to your church and give a talk on Islam – the peaceful religion.’” Think about that. Just three days after what we would call a massive public relations disaster, churches were the target of a new push to Islamify America. And amazingly, churches took them up on the deal. And so began the Bridge Building / Interfaith gathering movement. Stop for a moment and process this with me. Following up just three days after the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil shows how brilliant Islam’s strategy is to reach a consensus. How many other religions did this? My guess is very few if any.
Warner and his wife attended the first interfaith gathering in Nashville, TN, which consisted of one Rabbi, one Christian minister, and one Muslim who was an Imam. After each one presented their own point of view, Warner’s wife asked the Christian minister, “Have you ever read the Qur’an?” “Well, no, but I intend to,” he replied. Then the Rabbi was asked, “Have you ever read the Qur’an?” “No, I have not,” he said. Then the Imam was asked, “Have you read the Old Testament, the Hebrew Bible?” The Imam replied, “Oh, yes. I’ve had several courses in it.” Then the Imam was asked, “Have you read the New Testament?” He said, “Yes, I have. I’ve had several courses in it as well.” How is this going to play out? Two representatives that were professionally ignorant, and one who knows everything.
Warner said that the Christian minister and the Rabbi were there to smile and be nice. They were not going to resist anything that the Imam told them. The first thing the Imam told them was that Jesus was in the Qur’an. The truth is there is a character named Isā in the Qur’an, but not Jesus. The Jesus of the Bible is not the same as Isā in the Qur’an. The Qur’an says that Isā was created from dust like Adam (Qur’an 3:59), he was not God or the Son of God (Qur’an 5:17, 72-73, 116; 9:30-31; 17:111; 19:34-35), nor did he die on the cross and rise from the dead (Qur’an 4:157-159). But the problem is the Christian minister did not know enough about Islam to push back on this.
The first Palm Sunday after 9/11, the pastor of a very large church in Nashville, TN, stood up and told the congregation that he had a new best friend, who was a local Imam. The concern is that on a Palm Sunday, he was thrilled to have this Imam as a new best friend, but during his sermon he never mentioned Jesus. Warner concludes that what he sees in Nashville, TN, is that the strongest supporters of Islam are the churches.
Why is this so important? Warner states that the American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) in Nashville, TN, was put in charge of training the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) and the highway patrol on the subject of terrorism. Warner listened to a recording of this entire event and said that the Muslim trainer basically preached the dawahwhich is the Islamic practice of inviting people to embrace the faith of Islam. It involves communicating the message of the Qur’an and the teachings of their Prophet Mohammed, promoting Islamic beliefs, and demonstrating exemplary behavior and good conduct.
Suppose you were a member of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and after that meeting, you go to your church and tell them you just learned that Muslims and Christians worship the same God. “Is that true?” you ask. And the church leaders reply, “Oh, yes, it is very true.” So, what is being done here is churches are believing the falseness that Islamists are presenting as truth. Why are churches doing this? Because they are ignorant about the truth of Islam. They have not read the Qur’an nor the Hadith. Their lack of knowledge is making them vulnerable to deception.
Another example is a Presbyterian pastor in Nashville, TN, who was invited to visit the country of Turkey by the equivalent of the Turkey Muslim Brotherhood who also paid for his trip. When he returned to the U.S., he wrote an article in the Nashville newspaper which expressed his elation about Islam. He basically said if this is what Islam is, then we must embrace it. Bring on all the Islam that you want. However, it took a Hindu (not a Christian) to write an opposing opinion to this minister’s article in the newspaper, which informed the readers that this pastor was walking in the graveyard of Christianity, and he did not know it. This Hindu writer informed this pastor that everything appears to be fine in Turkey, because Turkey’s history shows that all is fine now because the Christians had been eliminated by Islam.
Why did a Hindu have to push back on the Christian minister’s conclusion? Because Christian leaders and churches are not being taught the truth about Islam in Christian seminaries or universities. Instead, they are being taught a falseness that says Islam is a loving and peaceful religion.
Let’s go to Plano, Texas, where the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) has a “402-acre master plan near Josephine, Texas, known as EPIC City. Marketed as a peaceful, self-sustained Muslim community, its design is far more ambitious: a mosque, school system, senior housing, a college, commercial centers — even law offices that align with Islamic legal doctrine. Over a thousand homes, all structured under the banner of a singular religious identity. The project’s ideological architect, Yasir Qadhi — a name familiar to many of us who have long warned about his agenda — is openly calling it ‘EPIC 1.0’ and ‘2.0’ with the goal of making this model replicable across North America.” [51] [emphasis added]
“Yasir Qadhi, is no moderate. He’s not even quietly radical. He is openly hostile to democracy, pluralism, and Western civilization as we know it. Qadhi has stated, verbatim, that: ‘No Supreme Court, no system of government, no democracy where they vote… What gives you the right to prohibit something or allow something?’ (Yasir Qadhi, public lecture—archived and transcribed by MEMRI and various Islamic watchdogs)
“This is not a fringe interpretation. Qadhi is telling you plainly: democracy is illegitimate. In his own words: ‘To believe that it is permissible to follow a system of laws other than the Sharia negates one’s testimony of Islam.’ (Yasir Qadhi, [IlmSummit 2008], widely cited in scholarly critiques of political Islam)
“According to Qadhi’s ideology, any Muslim who believes in constitutional law, religious tolerance, or separation of church and state has rejected Islam and is to be considered an apostate. And what happens to apostates under Sharia? Qadhi doesn’t shy away: ‘Yes, under the Islamic law, apostasy is a crime punishable by death. That is the consensus of the scholars.’ (Yasir Qadhi, Islamic Awareness Conference, 2009)
“This is not religion. This is totalitarian theocracy. Qadhi’s record includes:
· Referring to Christians as “filthy polytheists” whose lives “hold no value” in jihad. (Islamic seminar, 2006)
· Justifying the killing of homosexuals and apostates under Islamic law. (Islamic Center of Tennessee, recorded lectures)
· Fundraising for Aafia Siddiqui, the al-Qaeda-linked terrorist convicted of attempting to kill U.S. soldiers. (2008 fundraising dinner, documented by IPT)
· Denying the Holocaust, only to later “clarify” under pressure. (2001 online post, now deleted, archived by critics)
· Praising the Taliban and calling for a jihad-aligned worldview to be nurtured among American Muslims.” [52]
“During a recent segment on Brannon Howse Live, we examined footage of Islamic schools in Texas that teach skewed geopolitical narratives, including maps that effectively erase Israel, labeling the entire region ‘Palestine.’ Boys and girls separated. Hijabs mandatory. And the teachings go far beyond religion — they push a worldview that prioritizes Islamic law, Sharia, over American principles.
“While they build, they also infiltrate — demanding curriculum changes in public schools, fighting for Islamic holidays in school calendars, and even leveraging county and city officials, including the mayor of Plano, to normalize this takeover as ‘interfaith collaboration.’ But this isn’t about faith. It’s about power.
“Let’s be brutally honest: Islamists are using our freedoms to gain control and silence resistance. Free speech? They weaponize it to promote intolerance under the banner of tolerance. Freedom of religion? They invoke it to demand special privileges — while marginalizing every other belief system that doesn’t align. And anyone who speaks up? Labeled ‘Islamophobic,’ smeared, threatened, even hunted.
“… Now the movement is turning bold. Bolder than ever. With over 260 Sharia-aligned Muslims already elected to office in this country — and projections showing that number will climb toward 300 by 2026 — we’re facing something far more dangerous than just ‘cultural differences.’ This is political Islam. Organized. Funded. Protected by lawfare. And it will not stop at Texas.” [53][emphasis added]
Conclusion
Since 9/11, Islam has slowly but surely infiltrated [not immigrated into] American society.This article is just scratching the surface of Islam’s influence in America. Like never before, Christians must be equipped to address the truth about Islam. Lord willing, in the coming months, we will compare Islamic beliefs and practices with Christian beliefs and practices: [54]
The Qur’an or the Bible? (Two different Scriptures)
Tawhid or the Trinity? (Two different Gods)
Mohammed or Jesus Christ? (Two different Founders)
Sharia or the Gospel? (Two different Solutions)
Jihad or the Crusades? (Two different holy wars)
Witnessing to Muslims
The burden of my heart is to equip Christians to better communicate the love of Jesus Christ for all people, especially Muslims, through the gospel or good news of Jesus’ death and resurrection (John 3:16; Rom. 5:8; I John 4:9-10). And also, I am deeply burdened to inform Muslims of the Christian perspective so they may come to the point of receiving Jesus’ life freely through faith alone in Him alone (John 3:14-16; 4:10-14; 10:10a; Rom. 6:23b), and then begin to experience His life abundantly through discipleship (John 8:30-32; 10:10b; 13:34-35; 15:1-8; et al.).
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Retrieved on September 5, 2025, from Hannah Hartig and Carroll Doherty’s September 2, 2021, article entitled, “Two Decades Later, the Enduring Legacy of 9/11,” at www.pewresearch.org.
[2] Retrieved on September 5, 2025, from “Repercussions of 9/11” at www.911memorial.org.
[4] Retrieved on September 5, 2025, from Hannah Hartig and Carroll Doherty’s September 2, 2021, article entitled, “Two Decades Later, the Enduring Legacy of 9/11,” at www.pewresearch.org.
[6] Retrieved on September 5, 2025, from “Implementing 9/11 Commission Recommendations,” at www.dhs.gov.
[7] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from Britannica’s article entitled, “WTC Muslim Center,” which cites CNN Opinion Research Poll, Opinion Research Corporation, Aug. 11, 2010, at www.britannica.com.
[8] Ibid., cites Newt Gingrich, “Statement on Proposed Mosque/Islamic Community Center near Ground Zero,” www.newt.org, July 21, 2010.
[9] Ibid., cites Barack Obama, “Remarks by the President at Iftar Dinner,” www.whitehouse.gov, Aug. 13, 2010.
[10] Retrieved on August 31, 2025, from September 21, 2011, Associated Press article entitled, “Park51 Islamic Center Near Ground Zero Opens Its Doors,” atwww.nbcnewyork.com.
[11] Norman L. Geisler and Abdul Saleeb, Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the CrossSecond Ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1993, 2002), pg. 7.
[13] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from Gina Zurlo’s article, “World Christianity: It’s annual statistical table time!” at www.omsc.ptsem.edu; Haruto Nakamura’s July 1, 2024, article, entitled, “Global Christian Population: How Many Christians Are in the World?” at www.hotbot.com; Pam Wasserman’s January 12, 2024, article entitled, “World Population by Religion: A Global Tapestry of Faith,” at www.populationeducation.org.
[14] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from “Global Muslim Population,” at www.timesprayer.com.
[16] Geisler and Saleeb, Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the CrossSecond Ed., pg. 295.
[17] Ibid., pg. 296 cites John Alden Williams, Islam (New York: George Braziller, 1962), pp. 224-225. Geisler and Saleeb also state, “For two recent sympathetic works on Shi’ite Islam, written by Shi’ite scholars, see…” Moojan Momen, An Introduction to Shi’ite Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi’ism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) and Abdulaziz Sachedina, Islamic Messianism: The Idea of Mahdi in Twelver Shi’ism (Albany, NY.: NY.” State University of New York Press, 1981).
[18] Retrieved on August 30, 2025, from Conrad Hackett’s Jun 10, 2025, article entitled, “Islam was the world’s fastest-growing religion from 2010 to 2020,” from www.pewresearch.org.
[20] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from the June 9, 2025, report by Conrad Hackett, Marcin Stonawski, Yunping Tong, Stephanie Dramer, Anne Shi, and Dalia Fahmy, entitled, “3. Muslim population change,” at www.pewresearch.org.
[21] Retrieved on August 31, 2025, from Ryan Burge’s October 4, 2021, article entitled, “The Future Of American Religion: Birth Rates Show Who’s Having More Kids,” at www.religionunplugged.com.
[22] Retrieved from Clement Lisi’s August 23, 2023, article entitled, “New York Mosques Can Broadcast Call To Prayer Without A Permit,” at www.religionunplugged.com.
[23] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from Ira Stoll’s September 1, 2025, article, “New York City May Now Have More Muslims Than Jews,” at www.theeditors.com; Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from “Islam in New York City, “ at www.en.wikipedia.org.
[24] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Celina Tebor’s CNN August 29, 2023, article entitled, “New York City mosques can now broadcast Muslim call to prayer on Friday afternoons without permit,” at www.cnn.com.
[25] These five daily prayers are obligatory for all Muslims and are one of the Five Pillars of Islam.
[26] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Amy Mek’s April 13, 2023, update entitled, “Minneapolis Becomes First U.S. City to Blast Islamic Call to Prayer Five Times a Day, Starting at 3:30 am (Update),” at www.rairfoundation.com.
[27] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Zhaoyin Feng’s November 15, 2021, article entitled, “The US city run by Muslim Americans,” at www.bbc.com.
[28] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Kalpana Jain’s June 21, 2023, article entitled, “Islam’s call to prayer is ringing out in more US cities – affirming a long and growing presence of Muslims in America,” at www.theconversation.com.
[29] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Brannon Howse’s, June 1, 2023, program entitled, “Students Cannot Pray Over P.A. System Before Football Games But Muslims Can Use P.A. System For Islamic Call to Prayer,” at www.worldviewtube.com.
[31] Brackets added by Fair Foundation USA, see Mek’s April 13, 2023, update entitled, “Minneapolis Becomes First U.S. City to Blast Islamic Call to Prayer Five Times a Day, Starting at 3:30 am (Update),” at www.rairfoundation.com.
[34] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from AP news article on April 18, 2017, entitled, “Deadly spree shooting in central California racially motivated, police say,” at www.cbc.ca. The police say it was not terrorism, but a racially motivated shooting even though the shooter shouted, “Allahu akbar!” during his arrest.
[35] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from BBC news article entitled, “Michigan airport knife attacker shouted ‘Allahu akbar,’ says FBI,” at www.bbc.com.
[36] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Robert Spencer’s November 2, 2017, article entitled, “NY Deputy Police Commissioner: ‘This isn’t about Islam, this isn’t about the mosque he attends,’” at www.worldviewtube.comand from May 17, 2023, article entitled, “Judge Imposes Eight Consecutive Life Sentences Plus 260 Years in Prison for ISIS-Inspired 2017 Murder of Eight Victims and Attempted Murder of 18 Others in NYC Truck Attack,” at www.justice.gov.
[37] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from NBC news article on November 1, 2024 entitled, “Hate crime and terrorism charges filed after Jewish man shot in ‘targeted’ attack,” at www.nbcnews.com.
[38] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from an AP September 7, 2025, article entitled, “Hundreds mourn 8-year old, who was killed in a mass shooting at a Minneapolis Church,” atwww.abcnews.go.com.
[39] Red-Green Axis refers to an alliance between Communist, Marxists, Socialists, Liberals (Red) and Islam (Green). Their goal is to bring America down – see Aynaz Anni Cyrus’ February 19, 2019, program entitled, “Former Muslim on Red-Green Axis Behind Interfaith Dialogue,” at www.worldviewtube.com.
[40] Retrieved on September 8, 2025, from Brannon Howse’s August 29, 2025, program with Anni Cyrus entitled, “Unveiling the Red-Green Axis: From Minneapolis to Venezuela, Exposing Global Threats and Cultural Shifts,” at www.worldviewtube.com.
[41] Ryan King and Carl Campanile’s June 29, 2025, article entitled, “Zohran Mamdani doubles down on plan to target ‘whiter neighborhoods’ with higher taxes — and says billionaires shouldn’t exist,” at www.nypost.com; Joseph Ax’s June 29, 2025, article entitled, “New York mayoral candidate Mamdani defends campaign despite Democratic unease,” at www.reuters.com.
[42] See updated November 5, 2025 article by Rachel Treisman and Brian Mann entitled, “Mamdani wins New York City mayoral race, in a historic victory for progressives,” at www.npr.org or at this LINK.
[43] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from the June 25, 2025, Brannon Howse Live interview with Islamic expert Trevor Loudon entitled, “Unmasking Zohran Mamdani: Marxist, Islamist, and the New York Mayoral Race,” at www.worldviewtube.com.
[47] Retrieved on September 6, 2025, from the June 25, 2025, article entitled, “What Does ‘Globalize the Intifada’ Mean and How Can it Lead to Targeting Jews with Violence?” at ajc.org.
[48] Jill Colvin’s June 29, 2025, article entitled, “How Democrats in America’s most Jewish city embraced a critic of Israel for New York mayor,” at www.apnews.com.
[49] Retrieved on August 30, 2025, from March 12, 2024, article entitled, “Mosques: A fixture of America’s cultural landscape,” at www.archive-share.america.gov.
[50] The following ten paragraphs are adapted from Brannon Howse’s August 6, 2019, interview with Bill Warner entitled, “Christian Universities Aiding in the Islamization of America,” at www.worldviewtube.com.
[51] Retrieved on September 10, 2025, from Aynaz Anni Cyrus’ May 1, 2025, article entitled, “Texas, We Have a Problem: Sharia is coming to town,” at www.thefrontpagemag.com.
[52] Retrieved on September 10, 2025, from Aynaz Anni Cyrus’ May 2, 2025, article entitled, “EPIC City – Caliphate Blueprint USA: Welcome to a community in Texas – where the Constitution is not welcome,” at www.thefrontpagemag.com.
[53] Retrieved on September 10, 2025, from Aynaz Anni Cyrus’ May 1, 2025, article entitled, “Texas, We Have a Problem: Sharia is coming to town,” at www.thefrontpagemag.com.
[54] These categories of comparison are adapted from Nabeel Qureshi, No God but One: Allah or Jesus?A Former Muslim Investigates the Evidence for Islam and Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2016 Kindle Edition).
The last few weeks have been filled with disturbing reports about the dismantling of the United States so that our country is no longer a superpower. These reports are not addressing an enemy that is outside of the U.S. They are speaking of an enemy that is here on U.S. soil. Reports indicate that thousands of Chinese military-aged males, Iranians, and Iranian-backed terrorists such as Hezbollah, have entered our country through its porous borders during the previous presidential administration. [1]
Following the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities by the U.S. military on June 22, 2025, there is a growing concern that terrorist sleeper cells here in the U.S. will seek revenge against Americans.[2]Now with 4th of July celebrations coming up this week across the country, U.S. law enforcement is on high alert for Iranian retaliation. [3]
There are some analysts who believe that Islam is also seeking to cause America to collapse from within. We have over 2,700 mosques throughout the U.S.[4] What are these mosques teaching? Their sacred writing is called the Qur’an which they understand to be divine and unchanging. These mosques teach Jihad[5] and want there to be a movement towards Sharia Law[6] which is contrary to American Law.
It is naïve for Americans to believe that Islam is a peaceful religion. It is not. The ultimate goal of Islam is to convert the world to its religion (Qur’an 8:39). Allah (the god of Islam) [7] instructs his followers to kill the infidels – those who refuse to convert to Islam (Qur’an 5:72-76; 9:5; 47:4). However, Allah instructs his followers to treat infidels peacefully and not involve them in war only when the infidels have more might and larger numbers (Qur’an 47:35), much like their prophet Mohammed said as when he was weak in Mecca. Then when Mohammed became strong, he went to war with them and took over the city of Mecca by the edge of the sword. [8]
When Muslims are outnumbered by non-Muslims (infidels), instead of overtaking them with violence, they seek to overtake them through non-violent means. Some examples written by a Christian Arab American years ago, include: [9] [brackets added]
1. Terminate America’s freedom of speech by replacing it with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills.
2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of African Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only. What they fail to tell African Americans is that it was Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for black and slave is the same, “Abed.”
3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.
4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office to bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.
5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corporations or a controlling stock.
6. Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America – black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41 percent of it comes from the Middle East.
7. Yell “foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Qur’an”anytime Islam is criticized, or the Qur’an is analyzed in the public arena.
8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam [President Obama welcomed the Muslim Brotherhood to the White House during his administration. [10]]…
9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:
• Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961).
• Use no birth control whatsoever – every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.
• Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one can’t legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.
• Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2,000 released inmates have joined al-Qaida worldwide). Only a few ”sleeper cells” have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil.
10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1,500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy…
When you read through this plan, every point has been unfolding since the time of its writing years ago. Its author wrote, “Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?“
Here in the U.S., our largest city has a Muslim democratic mayoral candidate who recently defeated the former Democratic governor of New York in the primary elections. [11] This mayoral candidate states that Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish state. [12] I wonder how this will play out if Mamdani is elected mayor of New York City, especially among its Jewish and Christian residents there?
What I am describing in this introduction is warfare that is up close, not “out there”somewhere in another country. We are facing a complex battle on our own soil.
The apostle Paul reminds us that our battle is not against “flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.” (Eph. 6:12). Paul discusses four groupings of demonic spirits in this verse. You can read more details about these groupings in the third of these articles in this Spiritual Warfare series. But the main thing to understand is that our primary battle is not with people – not with Iranians, the Chinese, or Islamists. Our primary battle is with the Devil and his entire kingdom of darkness consisting of various demonic spirits under different levels of authority, all of which are under Satan, who is “the prince” (Eph. 2:2) of this kingdom, “the god of this age” (2 Cor. 4:4), and “the ruler of this world” (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11; cf. Matt. 4:8-9).
The Whole Armor of God
God wants every Christian to wear “the whole armor of God” so we may stand against the “wiles” or trickery of the Devil (Eph. 6:11). The first three pieces of armor we have with us all of the time [13] (“having girded… put on… shod…” – Eph. 6:14-15). [14] This is the state we are always in. But the last three pieces of armor we are called to take and use as needed [15] (“taking … take…” Eph. 6:16-17), [16] especially “in the evil day” (Eph. 6:13b) when all hell breaks loose and seeks to steal, kill, and destroy us (John 10:10a).
Paul describes the armor that Roman infantrymen wore in the order they would put it on. The soldier first puts on his belt which represents the Christian’s belt of truth (Eph. 6:14a). Since Satan is the father of lies (John 8:44), this first piece of armor is essential to protecting us from Satan’s deceptions and lies. We learned that truth is God’s viewpoint on a subject. It is the absolute standard by which reality is measured in its original form. [17]Truth points us in the direction that God wants to lead us.
After putting on his belt, the soldier then puts on his breastplate which protects his vital organs in his chest region. “The breastplate” (Eph. 6:14b) we are to put on is “righteousness” (dikaiosunē) which refers to the quality of “being right.” [18]God’s truth is the informational base that tells us the right thing to do. The truth points our heart in the direction of God’s righteousness. The breastplate of righteousness is our response to God’s truth or viewpoint on a matter.
When God’s truth and righteousness are operative in our lives, it will lead to the next piece of armor which is feet shod with the gospel of peace (Eph. 6:15). We are often faced with a myriad of choices and decisions in life, but how do we know we have made the right choices or decisions? How do we know we are moving in the right direction? How do we know we have the right perspective on a matter? God’s peace will confirm it. The Lord will give us a deep-seated calm to move forward (“feet” suggest movement) with a decision even though hell may be breaking loose in our lives.
As we experience God’s peace as a result of His truth and righteousness being operative in our lives, we can then see our faith in God renewed and strengthened. This leads to the fourth piece of armor which is “the shield of faith” (Eph. 6:16) which can protect us from the flaming arrows of the evil one that he uses to cause us to doubt our Christian faith.
The next piece of armor we are to take up is the “helmet of salvation” (Eph. 6:17a). This powerful piece of spiritual armor protects and directs our thoughts, so our lives are filled with hope. Satan wants us to lose hope about our past salvation from the penalty of sin (Acts 16:31), our present salvation from the power of sin (Jas. 1:21-22), and our future salvation from the presence of sin (I Thess. 1:10; 4:13-5:11; I John 3:2-3).
Up to this point Paul has been focusing on our defensive armor. But the sixth piece of armor is “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.” (Eph. 6:17b). This is the only offensive piece of spiritual armor God has given us. Why would God give us only one offensive piece of armor to use against the kingdom of darkness? Because this one piece of armor is sufficient to overcome our enemy. Notice that it is a “sword” that belongs to “the Spirit.” This is the tool the Spirit of God uses to address the spiritual attacks we are facing.
Two Types of Swords
The New Testament uses two different Greek words for “sword.” One of those words (rhomphaia) refers to “a large and broad sword”[19] that was used for defending oneself from somewhat of a distance (cf. Luke 2:35; 21:24; Rev. 2:12, 16; 6:8). This word is used figuratively to describe the powerful word that proceeds from the mouth of King Jesus to decimate His enemies when He returns to earth at the end of the seven-year Tribulation (Rev. 19:15, 21). But this is not the word Paul uses in Ephesians 6:17b.
The other Greek word used for “sword” (machaira) was used of a shorter and very sharp sword like a dagger. [20]It was approximately eighteen inches long. This is what Peter used to cut off the ear of the high priest’s servant in his attempt to protect Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane (cf. Matt. 26:51; Mark 14:47; Luke 22:49-50; John 18:10-11). This sword was used in hand-to-hand combat when the enemy was up close and in your face. This is the word Paul uses in Ephesians 6:17b
“The sword of the Spirit” is the tool that the Holy Spirit uses in the spiritual realm. [21] The Spirit uses this sword when the enemy confronts you up close in “the evil day.” When Satan or his demonic spirits are attacking you up close and there is no escape because they have encompassed you, you must get to the enemy quickly, definitively, and decisively. This is the sword the Holy Spirit (not us) uses to stab the enemy and give him a death blow to his attempts to defeat us.
This is the only offensive weapon the Spirit uses in the spiritual realm. He uses the sword of the Spirit to address the spiritual conflict in the invisible world which is being manifested up close in our visible world. This is the piece of armor that the Spirit uses to deal with what is causing us distress in the world in which we live. If we don’t believe the source of our battle stems from the spiritual world, we won’t use this piece of armor.
If we don’t use this spiritual weapon God has given us, we will be like Moses and Peter. When Moses tried to deliver Israel, he killed the Egyptian who was mistreating a Hebrew slave (Exod. 2:11-15). When Peter wanted to deliver Jesus in Gethsemane, he took out his sword and cut off the ear of the high priest’s servant (Matt. 26:51; John 18:10). Jesus, the God of the Old and New Testaments, told both of these men that He did not need their human methodologies or perspectives to fight a spiritual battle (Exod. 3:2-10; Matt. 26:52-54; John 18:11).
Many of us may be losing our spiritual battle because our default response to spiritual attack is to turn to human approaches or perspectives instead of God’s approach and perspective. We may be quick to seek human wisdom instead of God’s wisdom. When we choose to use a man-made method for a spiritual battle, we will have no assistance from God in our war against the kingdom of darkness.
For example, this is why God’s Word says, “For the wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God.” (Jas. 1:20b). My human anger will not produce the righteousness of God. When I get cut off in traffic during rush hour, it is easy for me to be quick to anger toward that inconsiderate driver. My thoughts and words at that time do not express the righteousness of God. But God says, “Let Me handle this, Jeff.” (Rom. 12:17-19).
What is the Sword?
Paul informs us that “the sword of the Spirit” is “the word of God.” (Eph. 6:17b). There are three Greek words that are translated “word” in the New Testament. The first is graphē and it refers to the “writings or a piece of writing.”[22] Scripture is called the graphē (2 Tim. 3:16). The Bible you hold in your hand is the graphē. Those sixty-six books in written form are the graphē. But Paul is not talking about carrying your Bible around to defeat the devil on the evil day. Some people treat the Bible as a lucky charm and take it with them everywhere they go. That is not what Paul is talking about here.
The second Greek word is logos.The apostle John referred to Jesus as the Logos (John 1:1). Logos refers to a “message.”[23] Jesus was God’s messenger to the world. He presented God to humanity (John 1:18). Logos is also the content of the Bible (graphē). For example, when you hear a sermon at church, you are hearing the logos or message of the Bible which brings clarity to your understanding so you can apply it more effectively to your Christian life. Logos is very powerful. But this is not the word Paul uses for the sword of the Spirit.
The Greek word that Paul uses for “word” is the Greek word rhēma. This word means “utterance” or “words spoken and declared.” [24]Paul did not say, “the sword of the Spirit, which is the graphē of God.” Nor did he say, “the sword of the Spirit, which is the logos of God.” No, Paul says, “the sword of the Spirit, which is the rhēma of God.”
Evans explains it like this: “The rhēma is the declaration of the logos that you got from the graphē… The sword that the Spirit uses is the rhēma of God. The graphē, the book, gives you the logos, the message. But it is the rhēma that plunges in and draws blood. It is the rhēma that the Spirit uses. So many of us are not seeing the power of the Spirit because we have not graduated to the rhēma. We are either stuck at graphē… Others of us… come to understand the logos, the message. We want to understand the sermon… the truth… We may be inspired by it or educated by it… But when it comes to spiritual warfare… you need more than graphē and logos. You need rhēma – the logos from the graphē uttered.” [25]
Two swords clash together and the Word of God is victorious.
We want to utter or declare (rhēma) the logos (message) because of its intrinsic nature. Regarding the logos, the Bible says, “For the word (logos) of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Heb. 4:12). When we get the message (logos) it is “living and powerful.” It has supernatural energy behind it. It is “sharper than any two-edged sword.” It can cut either way you swing it because on both sides of its blade it is razor sharp.
How sharp is the logos of God? It is so sharp, it can pierce “to the division of soul and spirit.” The “word”(logos) that God uses is able to penetrate the invisible world (“soul and spirit”). The spiritual world consists of our “soul” (psyches) which is being saved from the power of sin (sanctification) as we hear and do what God says (Phil. 2:12; Jas. 1:21-22) and our “spirit” (pneumatos) which was saved forever from the penalty of sin (justification) when we believed in Jesus for His gift of salvation (cf. Ezek. 36:26; Acts 16:21; Eph. 4:23-24; Heb. 10:14).
The author of Hebrews is telling us that “the word” (logos) is so sharp it can slice into the spiritual realm and separate what is “spirit” and what is “soul” (Heb. 4:12). Why does God want to use the message or logos to separate our “soul and spirit”? Because our “soul” can get in the way of our “spirit.” Our “soul” has been distorted by sin and it can hinder us from expressing our “spirit” which is who we truly are in Christ. Our personality, how we were raised, educated, and the perspective we have can all get in the way of our “spirit” which is our true identity in Christ.
Our “spirit” and “soul” can be so intertwined that we need the logos to separate the two so He can remove our soul-driven life and enable the “spirit” to express God’s presence in our lives. Remember, our “spirit” was created “according to God, in true righteousness and holiness” (Eph. 4:23-24) and was “perfected forever” (Heb. 10:14) when we were born again through faith in Jesus. Our spirit “cannot sin because” it “has been born of God” (I John 3:9). When the soul is removed from our decision making, then our “spirit” can express the character of Jesus in our lives. But the only thing that can get our “soul” out of the way is the logos of God.
For example, when you hear a sermon online or in person, the message (logos) of the Bible (graphē) is used by God to reveal that what you thought (“soul”) about a matter and what God thought (“spirit”) about it are not the same. The logos is revealing that the perspective your parents or peers or a politician or a professor or a post on social media taught you is not the same as what God is teaching you. You are realizing that what God thinks about that particular matter is not the same as what you thought. When that happens, you are getting sliced and diced by the word (logos).
But the “word” (logos) not only exposes what we do, but it also reveals what we think. It “is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Heb. 4:12b). The logos not only discerns our thoughts but the intentions behind them. The goal of logos is to expose. The logos is God’s MRI or Xray machine.
When we come to church and read our Bibles, all we have done is open up graphē, the written word.But when the truth pierces our heart, we have encountered logos because the message is given. When we receive the message (logos) and accept it, we now have understanding and clarity about what God is saying. But in an up-close spiritual battle, the Spirit of God wants to use not just the graphē and the logos when you listen to Bible teaching on radio broadcasts or podcasts, He wants to use the rhēma of God, i.e., the spoken or declared word of God (Eph. 6:17b).
In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, “God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there was light.” (Gen. 1:3). God spoke, and it was so. The spoken word had the power within it to do what the spoken word declared would be done. God spoke it, and it happened exactly like He said it. Notice that there was no light until God spoke it into existence. God did not just think it into existence. He declared it and then there was light. There was power in the word spoken, not just in the word that is known. God used what He knew. The spoken word had the power within it to produce what the spoken word called for.
This is what the Spirit of God used to create light. How do we know this is what the Spirit used? The Bible tells us that when God was ready to create, “the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.” (Gen. 1:2b). The Spirit of God was ready to move when He heard the spoken word of Jesus. But the word of God had to be spoken before the Spirit could use it.
The same is true for us when we are in a spiritual battle. God’s Spirit wants to use the spoken word of God to defeat our enemy. It is not enough to know the Word. We must declare it to the enemy. This is what Jesus did when He was tempted in the wilderness by the devil. More on that after this next section.
Satan’s strategy is to knock the Sword of the Spirit out of our hands. Imagine you are a Roman soldier in a battle and an enemy soldier is coming at you. He is fully armed. He has his big rectangular shield that protects his entire body. All you can see is that big shield coming at you along with the top of his helmet … and … a … sword. If you are going to overcome this soldier, what is the first thing you will have to do? That’s right. You will have to knock the sword out of his hand. That is the only offensive weapon he has. If you go for his shield or even his helmet, he may stab you through with his sword. You have to get the sword out of his hand.
The “wiles” of the devil seek to knock the sword of the Spirit out of our hands. The best way for Satan to overcome the Christian is to knock the sword out of his hand. And, according to Ephesians 6:17b, the sword is the spoken (rhēma) word of God. If the devil can knock the spoken word of God out of the hand of the Christian, he can easily defeat the unarmed soldier for Christ. So, let’s look more closely at the wiles or methods of deception that Satan uses.
When Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden, the devil cast doubt on the spoken word of God. He said, “Had God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?” (Gen. 3:1b). The enemy got Eve to begin to doubt God’s spoken word. [29] Here the serpent turns Eve’s eye away from the freedom she has (“of every tree of the garden you may freely eat” – Gen. 2:16) and onto the single prohibition (“but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat” – Gen. 2:17). Eve said to the serpent, “2 We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden; 3 but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’” (Gen. 3:2-3). This turns her into a legalist in that she forgot the word “every” (she limited her freedom) and added the words “nor shall you touch it” (she increased her limitation). She begins to doubt the love and goodness of God.
Next Satan denies God’s spoken word. “Then the serpent said to the woman, ‘You will not surely die.’” (Gen. 3:4). This is an outright claim that God’s Word is not true; it cannot be trusted.
Finally, Satan distorts God’s spoken word when he says to Eve, “For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Gen. 3:5). The serpent distorts the truth by claiming God limited Adam and Eve because He (God) did not want them to be like He was, knowing good from evil. Of course, when Eve and Adam ate of the fruit, they did learn the difference between good and evil, but not the way God knows the difference.
God’s knowledge was intuitive; Eve’s knowledge was experiential. Adam and Eve tasted sin for the first time and felt its effects, the effects of the fall. They experienced sin. Up until this point, God has known about sin intuitively. Not until the cross will He know it experientially. He knows about sin the way a heart doctor knows about heart attacks. The man with the heart attack knows about heart attacks in a way the surgeon does not. This new knowledge doesn’t get Eve to first base in the realm of knowledge when compared to an omniscient Being. She got duped. Nevertheless, the serpent has done his work: three blows to the mid-section of Eve. Now he hops out of the ring and tags his partner, the world.
The world leaps into the ring in round two in order to knock Eve out. “So, when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate.” (Gen. 3:6). The world is made up of “the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life” (I John 2:16). The fruit “was good for food” (lust of the flesh), “pleasant to the eyes” (lust of the eyes), “desirable to make one wise” (pride of life). The world scores an uppercut, a chop to the chin, and a haymaker to the temple. Down goes Eve, down goes Eve, down goes Eve. Her husband wasn’t far behind.
Satan has been using these same simple boxing moves ever since. But notice, in round one the serpent is knocking the sword out of Eve’s hand (Gen. 3:1-5). The entire round is an attack on the spoken Word of God. Once the Word of God is no longer in the hand of the believer, he or she has lost the only offensive weapon they have. In leading Adam and Eve to sin, the serpent enjoys a two-round knockout. He is present only in round one. He uses the three punches mentioned above to undermine Eve’s faith in God’s Word. He tried to do the same thing with Jesus.
Remember when the Holy Spirit led Jesus into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil (Matt. 4:1-11)? Satan tried to use the same three punches on Jesus that he used on Eve in the Garden of Eden. First, the devil uses the lust of the flesh when he says to Jesus, “If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.” (Matt. 4:3). The phrase, “If You are the Son of God” is a first-class condition in the Greek language which assumes the condition is true, [31] and would therefore be translated, “Since You are the Son of God…” Satan is so crafty. He had been watching Jesus go without food for ”forty days and forty nights,” and of course “afterward He was hungry” (Matt. 4:2). So, the devil attacks Jesus at the point of His vulnerability.
And you know what? Satan and his demons are watching us and taking notes. They keep a scouting report on each of us. They know when we are vulnerable to temptation, and they act accordingly. [32]
So, Satan shows up at a specific time to address a legitimate need that Jesus has. He is telling Jesus, “Look, You are the Son of God. You can do whatever You want to do. So, You might as well command these stones to become bread.”“In this situation, Satan questioned the provision of God: Jesus was hungry. God hadn’t fed him. Why shouldn’t Jesus just make what was needed?” [33]
How does Jesus respond? He says, “It is written…” (Matt. 4:4a). Then Jesus quotes a verse from a chapter in the Old Testament, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” (Deut. 8:3). If the living Word (Jesus) needed to use the written Word to deal with the enemy of the Word, how much more must you and I who have written no word, need to use that same Word against the enemy of the Word?! Christ did not respond to the devil based on what He thought, and He had perfect thinking.
Jesus says, “Let Me tell you what the graphē says.” Christ tells Satan what the graphē says based on the logos. Christ doesn’t quote just any verse. He goes back to the Old Testament to a passage that deals with what He is facing in the New Testament. Christ was hungry. So, what does He do? He goes to Deuteronomy 8 where Moses explained to Israel how they survived through the wilderness when they were hungry. They survived by God’s provision. They didn’t survive merely because of the manna, but because of the One Who provided it through supernatural means. Was Jesus hungry? Yes. But He was willing to trust His Father to provide for Him supernaturally instead of acting independently of Him.[34]
Jesus had a legitimate need (hunger), and Satan was offering to meet that need in an illegitimate way – by having Jesus act independently of God. But God was offering to meet Christ’s legitimate need His way. The issue is not whether your need is legitimate; the issue is who is giving you the advice to address it? God or Satan?
Christ runs to Deuteronomy 8 and says to the devil, “Let Me tell You what God said about this situation.” “It is written: ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’” (Deut. 8:3). Man doesn’t live by bread alone, but by where it came from, “by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” When Satan heard what was written, he couldn’t handle that anymore, so he went to another subject.
Satan’s next temptation uses the pride of life. “ 5 Then the devil took Him up into the holy city, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple, 6 and said to Him, ‘If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: ‘He shall give His angels charge over you,’ and, ‘In their hands they shall bear you up, lest you dash your foot against a stone.’” (Matt. 4:5-6). Challenging Jesus to jump to His death doesn’t sound like much of a temptation. But notice that the devil supported his appeal by quoting God’s promise of angelic protection in Psalm 91:11-12. Jesus, then, had an opportunity to demonstrate that He was the promised Messiah for all of Jerusalem to see. The problem with Satan’s plan was it ignored God’s plan. If Jesus did what Satan advised Him to do, it would bypass the cross which was contrary to God’s will. [35]
Notice that Satan knows the Bible and he uses it. If the devil can’t convince you to act independently of God, he’ll work through your religion. But God doesn’t need Satan’s help to get you where He wants you to go.
Christ responds to Satan, by quoting Deuteronomy 6:16, “It is written again, ‘You shall not tempt the Lord your God.’” (Matt. 4:7). We are never to use disobedience to back God into a corner to force Him to fulfill His plan. [36]Satan was telling Jesus to test God. And Christ says to the devil, “God told Me in His Word not to test Him.” Notice that Satan does not argue with Jesus when He responds with the rhēma of God.
Instead, the devil uses the lust of the eyes to tempt Jesus. “8 Again, the devil took Him up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. 9 And he said to Him, ‘All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.’” (Matt. 4:8-9). Did you catch that? “The devil took Him…” Sometimes God lets the devil take us to tempt us. Ultimately Satan wanted Christ to worship him. So, he offers Jesus the entire kingdoms of the world and their glory if Jesus would take a knee before him. Satan wants our worship too. He will make incredible offers to us to get us to bow down to him.
How does Jesus respond? “Then Jesus said to him, ‘Get behind Me, Satan!” (Matt. 4:10a). This command displays Jesus’ absolute authority over the devil. Then Christ quotes, Deuteronomy 6:13, “For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” (Matt. 4:10b). Worship is reserved for the one true God and Him only. Too often we may come to worship God on Sunday and then serve lesser agendas and gods the rest of the week. But if Jesus is the ultimate authority in the universe, He deserves our exclusive worship and service. [37]
In responding to each of Satan’s temptations, Jesus did not just study the Bible and know what it said. He opened His mouth and uttered what it said. He said to the devil, “Let Me tell You what God just said about what you are telling Me.” And when Jesus told Satan what God said, “Then the devil left Him, and behold, angels came and ministered to Him.” (Matt. 4:11). The devil failed to knock the sword of the Spirit out of Jesus’ hands. He could not handle hearing the rhēma of God three times, so he left Jesus alone. When the fallen angel left, the faithful angels came and ministered to Jesus.
We may ask, “Why doesn’t the devil leave me alone?” Could it be because he knows we will never say, “It is written…”? He knows we will never bring that up. Instead, he knows we will talk about our families, our jobs, our education, our reading, our favorite sports, TV programs, and politicians, etc. He knows that we will never say, “It is written…” and if we do study the Word, he knows we are never going to use it and speak it to him. Thus, the devil does not fear us because we are not wielding “the sword of the Spirit, the word (rhēma) of God.” (Eph. 6:17b).
A Personal Example of the Rhēma of God
During a short-term mission trip in the Philippines with an evangelistic association in the summer of 2013, I was scheduled to go with three other American men to a predominantly Muslim area in the southern Philippines to preach the gospel in public schools. Two nights before we were to go there, the Filipino director and other Filipino staff who lived in or near that province began to brief me about the mission there and the high risk of going. Two countries recently issued an alert not to go into this area due to militant Muslim activity. I was told we would have to keep a low profile and have military escorts at all times. We would stay in our hotel when we were not preaching in schools.
The Filipinos then asked me a series of questions. They asked me, “What will you do if you are kidnapped?” “I would preach Jesus to them.” They asked, “But they will move you from militant camp to militant camp to make it difficult to find you. Then what?” “Then more Muslims will hear the gospel,” I said. They asked, “What about Pat and the girls if you are killed?” “God is their Father and He will take much better care of them than I ever could.” The staff then asked me, “What about how it would affect our evangelistic association if you were kidnapped or killed?” To which I said, “Good question. I will consider the implications.” But I thought to myself, Christ will be magnified in life or death. I knew I was called to go.
The pastors and I prayed and then I went to talk to the American founder and director of the association. He said no one should go if they are afraid because Muslims sense fear and try to bully those who are afraid. He said they don’t know how to handle fearless Christians. They can’t bully them. I told him I believed the Lord wanted me to go. I then went to tell the three other Americans of this new information to see if they were still led to go to the area. We talked and prayed a lot and the short of it is only two of us went.
I talked and prayed with Pat and the girls as well. They had obvious concerns, but I could not deny that the Lord Jesus wanted me to go. I shared with them verses God was bringing to my attention. “And the Lord, He is the One who goes before you. He will be with you, He will not leave you nor forsake you; do not fear nor be dismayed.” (Deut. 31:8). I asked, “Is there anywhere we can go where God has not already gone before us?” “No.” “Is there anywhere we can go where God will not be with us?” “No.” “Is there any place we can go where God will abandon us?” “No.” “Then what is there to fear?” “Nothing.” “Why be discouraged or dismayed?” “No reason.” We claimed Psalm 31:14-15, “But as for me, I trust in You, O Lord; I say, ‘You are my God. My times are in Your hand.’” My family was very concerned, but they knew the Lord was calling me to go.
I also shared with Pat and the girls how God had been speaking to me all week long leading up to this trip. I was having my devotions in the Book of Acts, and I would fall asleep thinking about what I had read and then dream about it at night and how God delivered the apostles from opposition and plots to kill them. When Stephen was being stoned, he saw Jesus standing in heaven as if to applaud his sacrifice for the gospel.
Satan’s attacks during the two nights before the trip were very intense. I felt an intense evil presence and intense fear gripped me. I had intrusive thoughts of being kidnapped, tortured, and dying a slow death. God led me to pull out the sword of the Spirit to confront the enemy. Two verses that especially ministered to me said, “9 Now the Lord spoke to Paul in the night by a vision, ‘Do not be afraid, but speak, and do not keep silent; 10 for I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city.’” (Acts 18:9-10). It wasn’t enough to read these verses (graphē) or understand their significance (logos). I needed to declare their message to the powers of darkness, “It is written: ‘9 Now the Lord spoke to Paul in the night by a vision, ‘Do not be afraid, but speak, and do not keep silent; 10 for I am with you, and no one will attack you to hurt you; for I have many people in this city.’” (Acts 18:9-10). The Holy Spirit calmed my heart and encouraged me, assuring me of His presence, His protection, and His people to watch out for us. By God’s grace, I was prepared to die but planning to return to my family.
When our team of Filipino pastors/translators and myself and another American arrived in the province we were to evangelize, we went to the Filipino military battalion to meet with them and share our intentions to preach the Gospel of peace in that area. Their commander was a very gracious and kind man who informed our Filipino staff that it was too dangerous for Americans to go alone, and they would provide 24/7 military escorts for us. Honestly, with Jesus with us I did not believe it was necessary to have military escorts, but God had a higher purpose than our own safety.
We learned additional information about the criticalness of the area a day or two later. A month before our arrival, the Filipino military had captured the Militant Muslims’ commander and now the Militants were threatening to kill our military escorts (3 of the 4 were already believers and the 4th became a believer during the week with us) and kidnap a teacher since we were preaching in elementary and high schools. We had a choice to make at this point: Do we pull out or press on and preach the Gospel to these needy souls?
We pressed on because God is much greater than the lies of Militant Muslims and their threats. The Lord went before us and we preached the gospel of grace in eighty-five schools, two-thirds of which were 90% Muslim. Our military escorts had agents in the jungle giving them updates on the position of the Militants. I learned from our Filipino team leader that the militants had 60-70 men who could have overpowered our military escorts at any time, but God protected us from them. We also would be an easy target for a sniper as we preached outdoors at school assemblies, but the Lord was our rock and refuge.
The most memorable experience for me was when we went to an elementary school composed of mostly Muslim students. When we arrived, we saw a crowd of adults meeting around a stage. Classes were cancelled due to a PTA meeting. The president of the PTA permitted us to interrupt their meeting so we could share the gospel with over 220 adults, most of whom were devoted Muslims as shown by the head garments they were wearing and their veils over the faces of the women.
I began by saying, “The God who made this universe, the God of Abraham loves you very much.” My translator boldly and clearly translated for me which emboldened me even more. I then proceeded to talk about sin, death, and deserving to die forever in hell where the fire never stops burning to which all the Muslims and a few Catholics nodded in agreement when they heard these truths. I then asked, “How many of you want to live forever in hell?”, raise your hands. None of them did.
Then God led me to say, “How many of you believe Jesus Christ was a prophet from God?” They all shook their heads “Yes.” Then I asked, “How many of you believe a prophet of God can lie?” They all shook their heads “No.” Then the Lord led me to say, “Jesus Christ said, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father, except through me. The only way to heaven, the only way to the God of Abraham is through Jesus Christ.”
As I said this, the devoted Muslims began to form a circle with each other in front of the stage, looking at me with eyes of anger and/or curiosity. I silently asked God to increase my love for them and my boldness. God enabled me to look each one in the eye through the remainder of the presentation as I shared about Jesus, Who was fully God and fully man. He loved them so much that He took their punishment for all of their sins and rose from the dead so that He is not alive to offer everlasting life as a free gift and peace with God to all who believe or trust in Him alone for His gift of everlasting life. After explaining the gospel, I invited them to take Jesus at His Word when He said, “Whoever believes in Him should not perish [in hell], but have everlasting life [in heaven]” (John 3:16b).
After leading them in a prayer to tell God they were now trusting in His Son, Jesus, for a home in heaven, I asked them, “How many of you just trusted in Jesus to give you a home in heaven? Raise your hands.” My heart leaped for joy as all of the people raised their hands, including the devoted Muslims whose faces turned from hate and confusion to hope and peace. We had to leave quickly for security reasons, but I praise the Lord Jesus for His faithfulness to seek and to save the lost.
God truly went before us on this trip as nearly twenty-seven thousand people heard the gospel in five days, and over twenty-four thousand said they trusted in Jesus for His gift of salvation. According to my figures, 96% of the people I shared with all publicly indicated they trusted in Jesus for a home in heaven. For the Muslims, this was more of an act of discipleship to publicly identify with Jesus Christ.
God also had believers in almost every school and/or village to fellowship with and feed us. In fact, every evening we met in the home of our team leader’s mother-in-law to feast and fellowship. Our last night in this province, we had a celebration dinner there. Afterward, we spent time in worship of our Savior Who is mighty to save.
Then each person shared a highlight from the trip, including the four soldiers who were with us 24/7. One of them said this, “Until the very last drop of our blood, we will protect you.”This was so humbling to hear. These soldiers were willing to take a bullet for us as were our translators. Their courage rubbed off on us. I experienced more peace in the militant area than I have experienced anywhere else. When I returned to the States, I learned that two Australian missionaries were shot and killed in the areas where we were either the week before we arrived or the week after.
As with all the pieces of armor, we take up the sword of the Spirit through prayer (Eph. 6:18-19).
Prayer:Gracious heavenly Father, thank You so much for the sword of the Spirit, the spoken word of God which has the power in Itself to do what it declares. It is with great joy that I lift the sword of Spirit and choose to abide in its truth and power. Holy Spirit, please open my eyes to see wonderful things in Your Word! Please enable me to use Your Word to defend myself from Satan, and also to wield the sword well on the battlefield when the Devil attacks me, so his lies and deceptions are exposed, and he is pushed back and defeated. I pray the power of the Holy Spirit is ignited in my life, so that Jesus may live His victorious life through me today and every day. In the mighty name of the Lord Jesus Christ, I pray. Amen.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Colonel Rob Maness Live with David Pyne, President of the Task Force on National & Homeland Security on June 23, 2025, “The U.S. Enters War with Iran – More War Monday,” at www.worldviewtube.com; Brannon Howse Live with Shahram Hadian on June 20, 2025 – “Iran-Backed Terror Threats Inside the U.S. as FBI Increases Efforts to Monitor Them” at www.worldviewtube.com; Sophia Compton’s June 19, 2025, Fox News article entitled, “Border Patrol agents shut down massive drug smuggling tunnel between Tijuana and San Diego,” at www.foxnews.com.
[2] Madison Colombo’s June 25, 2025, article entitled, “Obama’s former DHS secretary sounds alarm on Iranian sleeper cells, calls it concern of ‘highest magnitude’” at www.foxnews.com. Brannon Howse, June 24, 2025, “Rising Threat of Terror Cells in US,” at www.worldviewtube.com; Adam Goldman and Devlin Barrett’s June 23, 2025, article entitled, “F.B.I. Warns of Possible Retaliation by Iran After Bombing of Nuclear Sites,” atwww.nytimes.com; Tara Suter’s June 22, 2025, article entitled, “Threat of sleeper cells in US has ‘never been higher’: CBP,” at www.thehill.com.
[3] Bill Hutchinson’s June 25, 2025, article entitled, “With July 4 just days away, US law enforcement on high alert for Iran retaliation,” at www.abcnews.go.com; Brooke Shafer’s article, entitled, “US cities ramp up security ahead of Fourth of July celebrations,” at www.newsnationnow.com.
[4] See March 12, 2024, article entitled, “Mosques: A fixture of America’s cultural landscape,”
[5] Jihad refers to a holy war. In the Bible, people were killed because of their sin in the Old Testament. In the New Testament, Jesus Christ was killed for the sin of the world. But in Islam, Mohammed was commanded by Allah to kill the Christians and the Jews for not accepting Islam (Qur’an 9:29). According to the Qur’an, anyone who believes in Jesus is an infidel (Qur’an 5:72-76). Mohammed was killing Christians not because of their sins but because they believed in Christ. See Usama Dakdok’s article entitled, “Jihad,” at www.thestraightway.org.
[6] Shariah Law is Islamic Law and encompasses the words of Allah in the Qur’an and the words of Mohammed in the Hadith. For example, the Qur’an commands that Jews and Christians be decapitated (Qur’an 47:4). It also commands Muslims to kill the idolater which is anyone who worships any god but Allah (Qur’an 9:5). Men can beat their wives if they merely suspect rebellion (Qur’an 4:34). The Hadith (Abu Dawud 38:4447) teaches that the punishment for homosexuality is execution. This is what is practiced in Islamic countries. Muslims who come to America do not want to acclimate to our Constitution and laws. They want to establish Shariah Law which cannot coexist with American Law. See Anita Kuta’s article entitled “Sharia (Islamic Law),” at www.thestraightway.org.
[7] The god of Islam (Allah), is Satan for he is said to be the lord of the world in Qur’an 1:1-2, which when compared to the Bible, Satan is the ruler of the world, John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11; 2 Cor. 4:4. Allah is also known as the best deceiver as we read in Qur’an 3:54 and 8:30, when compared to the Bible, Satan is the deceiver, Gen. 3:1-6; 2 Cor. 11:3; Rev. 12:9. Allah also leads people astray as we read in Qur’an 35:8 which is a description of Satan in the Bible, Gen. 3:1-6; Rev. 12:9. He also desires to fill hell with people as we read in Qur’an 38:85, 11:119, and 32:13, but the Bible teaches that God desires all people to be saved (I Tim. 2:3-4) and that not one person should perish in hell (2 Pet. 3:9). Adapted from Asuma Dakdok’s article, “Are Allah and God the same?” at www.thestraightway.org.
[9] To see all 20 points go to the article posted by Pam Geller on July 1, 2009, entitled, “ISLAMIC INVASION OF AMERICA: THE 20 POINT PLAN,” at www.thestraightway.org. This 20-point plan originated from a refugee from the Muslim Middle East named Anis Shorrosh, author of ”Islam Revealed” and ”The True Furqan.” Anis is a Christian Arab American who emigrated from Arab-controlled Jerusalem in January 1967. Shorrosh says, “The following [20-point plan] is my analysis of Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020.”
[10] See Frank Gaffney’s pamphlet, The Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration (David Horowitz Freedom Center, 2012 Kindle Edition).
[11] Ryan King and Carl Campanile’s June 29, 2025, article entitled, “Zohran Mamdani doubles down on plan to target ‘whiter neighborhoods’ with higher taxes — and says billionaires shouldn’t exist,” at www.nypost.com; Joseph Ax’s June 29, 2025, article entitled, “New York mayoral candidate Mamdani defends campaign despite Democratic unease,” at www.reuters.com.
[12] Jill Colvin’s June 29, 2025, article entitled, “How Democrats in America’s most Jewish city embraced a critic of Israel for New York mayor,” at www.apnews.com.
[13] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2665.
[14] The first three verbs in Greek (perizōsamenoi… endysamenoi… hypodēsamenoi… ) are aorist middle participles which means they have already been put on by the soldier or Christian.
[15] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2665.
[16] The Greek verb translated “taking…” (analabontes) is an aorist active participle, meaning the Christian is taking the shield of faith as needed and the last Greek verb translated “take…” (dexasthe) is an aorist middle imperative which is used of the last two pieces of armor and means for oneself to take them up as needed.
[17] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 1820-1821.
[18] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pp. 247-248.
[21] These next five paragraphs are adapted from Tony Evan’s sermon video entitled, “The Sword of the Spirit” posted on July 17, 2021, at www.youtube.com.
[22] Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 2000 Kindle Edition, pg. 206.
[25] Evan’s sermon video entitled, “The Sword of the Spirit” posted on July 17, 2021, at www.youtube.com.
[26] Much of this section is adapted from Ibid unless otherwise noted.
[27] Much of this section is adapted from Ibid., unless otherwise noted.
[28] Much of this section is adapted from David R. Anderson, Position and Condition: An Exposition of the Book of Ephesians (Grace Theological Press, 2017 Kindle Edition), pp. 376-378, unless otherwise noted.
[29] Evan’s sermon video entitled, “The Sword of the Spirit” posted on July 17, 2021, at www.youtube.com.
[30] Much of this section is adapted from Evan’s sermon video entitled, “The Sword of the Spirit” posted on July 17, 2021, at www.youtube.com, unless otherwise noted.
[31] A. T. Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in Light of Historical Research (Originally published in 1914), 2014 Kindle Edition locations 1413-1414.
[32] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 1867.
As the celebration of Jesus’ birth approaches, I am reminded of that first Christmas which is recorded from a human perspective in Matthew’s and Luke’s gospels (Matt. 1:21-2:12; Luke 2:1-20). It is presented as a very peaceful event involving Mary and Joseph, some angels, shepherds, wise men, and the baby Jesus. The angels praised God saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, goodwill toward men!” (Luke 2:14). Hence, most Christmas celebrations today focus on the peace that surrounded the birth of Jesus, assuming He would bring peace “on earth” during His First Coming.
But at the beginning of the week before Jesus’ crucifixion when Christ triumphantly entered Jerusalem, a multitude of His followers praised God, saying: “Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!” (Luke 19:38). Notice they say, “Peace in heaven,” not “peace on earth.” The first coming of Christ would establish spiritual peace “in heaven” between God and humankind (Rom. 5:1; Eph. 2:16-18). But it won’t be until Jesus’ Second Coming to earth that universal peace “on earth” will be established by King Jesus during His thousand-year reign on earth (Rev 20:4-6; Isa. 2:1-4; 9:6b-7; Mic. 4:1-5).
In Revelation 12:1-5, the apostle John shares a version of the Christmas story that is from heaven’s perspective, and it is the opposite of peace (see above picture). This version of the Christmas story involves three main characters: the woman, representing the nation of Israel who endured much pain in bringing the Messiah into the world (Rev. 12:1-2; cf. Gen. 37:9-11); the Child, representing the Lord Jesus Christ (Rev. 12:2, 5); and the dragon, representing the Devil (Rev. 12:3-4a, 9).
When Jesus is born into the world, Satan is there with his army of demons represented by “a third of the stars of heaven” (Rev. 12:4a), waiting to destroy Him: “And the dragon (Satan) stood before the woman who was ready to give birth, to devour her Child (Jesus) as soon as it was born” (Rev. 12:4b – parenthesis added). While shepherds are watching, angels are singing, and wise men are worshipping, Satan is waiting to make his move. The attempt to kill the Child John sees in this vision is probably a reference to king Herod’s brutal attempt to kill Jesus (cf. Matt. 2:16).
The next verse says, “She bore a male Child who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron. And her Child was caught up to God and His throne.” (Rev. 12:5). In this version of the Christmas story Jesus goes from being born at Bethlehem, to ruling on the throne of the universe. John uses this one verse to summarize the birth, life, death, resurrection, ascension, and future reign of the Lord Jesus Christ. Satan not only used Herod in an attempt to kill the baby Jesus, but He would later use Judas to betray Him, Pilate to condemn Him, and the Roman soldiers to crucify Him. All the fury of hell would be released against the Child born on that silent night.
The rest of Revelation 12 talks about the last half of the Tribulation period when Satan and his fallen angels are cast down from heaven and persecute the people of God – the nation of Israel (cf. 12:7-17). Since Satan could not destroy the Christ Child Who is now on His throne in heaven, he is going to go after what is dearest to the Child – His own people. This is why there is so much opposition against God’s people today, especially His Jewish people, and it will only intensify as the Second Coming of Christ to earth draws near. If the Devil can destroy Israel before Jesus returns to earth with His Bride, the Church (Rev. 19:7-21), then there can be no triumphant return of Christ and Satan will rule the earth.
John’s version of the Christmas story reminds us we are in a struggle with a dragon. It is a struggle we can’t win; it is a struggle Jesus already won. You see, if you are a child of God through faith in Jesus Christ, Satan is going to attack you. “Satan” means adversary. During this Christmas season (and all our lives), he wants to rob us of the joy and peace of Christmas by reminding us of our sins and shortcomings. He will accuse us of the times we have lied and been unfaithful, of the times we’ve lost our temper and broken our promises.
The Armor of God
How can we deal with this intense spiritual battle whereby the enemy seeks to rob us of God’s peace? The apostle Paul instructs his Christian readers (including you and me) to “put on the whole armor of God” so we may stand against the “wiles” or trickery of the Devil (Eph. 6:11). Paul describes the armor that Roman infantrymen wore in the order they would put it on.
The soldier first puts on his belt which represents the Christian’s belt of truth (Eph. 6:14a). Since Satan is the father of lies (John 8:44), this first piece of armor is essential to protecting us from Satan’s deceptions and lies. We learned that truth is God’s viewpoint on a subject. It is the absolute standard by which reality is measured in its original form.Truth points us in the direction that God wants to lead us.
After putting on his belt, the soldier then puts on his breastplate which protects his vital organs in his chest region. “The breastplate” we are to put on is “righteousness” (dikaiosunē) which refers to the quality of “being right.” [1] God’s truth is the informational base that tells us the right thing to do. The truth points our heart in the direction of God’s righteousness. The breastplate of righteousness is our response to God’s truth or viewpoint on a matter.
When God’s truth and righteousness are operative in our lives, it will lead to the next piece of armor which has to with our feet or shoes (Eph. 6:15). Why is this so important?
The Importance of Our Feet
In the 21st century, we have shoes for every occasion. There are dress shoes, casual shoes, work shoes, and many kinds of athletic shoes. There are shoes for cold weather, warm weather, and rainy weather. We have indoor shoes and outdoor shoes. There are specialty shoes like dance shoes (ballet, tap, etc.), work boots (steel-toe, waterproof, etc.), and orthopedic shoes. Some of you may have a closet full of shoes that are designed to adorn your feet. The fact that we have so many varieties of shoes today demonstrates the importance of our feet. [2]
It is also a very serious thing to have feet that hurt. Have you ever noticed how difficult it is to focus on an objective when your feet are hurting? When your feet hurt, you hurt are over. When our feet hurt, we do not make a good soldier. This is why our military places great emphasis on examining the feet of a soldier. They understand that a person’s feet need to be comfortable to be a good soldier. God understands this more than anyone. [3]
The Soldier’s Sandals
God wants His people to wear a certain kind of shoes all the time because they will address an important issue regarding spiritual warfare in our lives. After a Roman soldier put on his belt and breastplate (Eph. 6:14), he then puts on his sandals: “And having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace.” (Eph. 6:15). The Greek word translated “shod” (hupodeō) is a compound word meaning “under” (hupo) plus “to bind/tie” (deō)or “to bind/tie under or beneath”[4](sandals). [5] It refers here to what you are wearing on your feet at all times. [6]
The word translated “preparation” (hetoimasia) refers to the state of “readiness.”[7] If we are wearing these shoes, we will be ready for the Devil’s attacks against us. We will be prepared to deal with our enemy’s methods of deception.
To properly understand this piece of armor, we need to realize that the Roman soldier had what modern-day American football players have. They had cleats or spikes coming out of the bottom of their shoes. “Roman soldiers wore sandals with cleats built in to help them have firm footing and to stand their ground under attack.”[8] These spikes on the bottom of a soldier’s sandals gave him stability and mobility on the battlefield. They kept him from slipping and sliding when he was under attack.
If we were in a battle in Paul’s day, we had better be well-shod. There would be nothing worse than losing our footing with an enemy standing over us with a sword in his hand. [9]
Paul has already emphasized the need to be stationary in battle by using the word “stand” (stēnai) or a form of this word (antistēnai/stēte) four times (Eph. 6:11, 13-14). Why? Because the Devil wants to knock us off our feet. He wants to knock us to the ground and keep us there. He desires to remove us from our place of stability.
When Paul says to have our feet “shod,” he is talking about placing ourselves in a stationary position so that when all hell breaks loose “in the evil day” (Eph. 6:13), Satan cannot knock us down or knock us out. Why? Because what we are wearing on our feet gives us stability and sure-footedness.
If you are like me, you know what it is like to be knocked over by the evil one. Our circumstances have knocked us over. Our finances have knocked us over. Our relationships with certain people have knocked us over. Our jobs have knocked us over. Our feet have slipped, and we are going down.
So, what this third piece of armor teaches us is that God wants to create stability or sure-footedness for us so that when we face a Satanic full-frontal attack, we can stand firm. Evans explains, “Through the cross and resurrection of Christ, victory is already won. The devil has lost. The only power he has is the power you give him. We are to stand firm in Christ’s victory. Paul tells the Ephesians over and over: stand (6:11, 13-14). In other words, stay in the area where victory has been achieved under the cover of God’s armor. When you stand under an umbrella, it doesn’t stop the rain. But it does stop you from getting wet. You have to dress for success in this thing called the Christian life.” [10][emphasis added]
The Purpose of Satan’s Attack
Remember that the Devil is a thief (John 10:10a). He knows he cannot take away our salvation because we are secure forever in Christ after we believe in Him for His free gift of eternal life which can never be lost (cf. John 3:16; 6:35-40; 10:28-29; Rom. 8:38-39; Eph. 1:13-14; I John 5:13). Since the evil one cannot keep us out of heaven, he wants to make us experience hell on earth.[11] How does he do this?
This third piece of armor teaches us that Satan wants to rob us of God’s “peace.” The opposite of “peace” is anxiety. The Devil wants God’s children to live with anxiety and fear. He knows that whatever we fear, we give control to. Hence, the purpose of the enemy’s attacks is to keep God from controlling our lives, so our salvation is not manifested through us. He wants to keep us defeated and discouraged.
But God wants His people to have feet that are not hurting in the area of “peace.” The Lord understands that one of the Devil’s strategies is to rob God’s people of His peace. Satan wants to promise us peace through his “wiles” or trickery. He will promise us peace through counterfeit religions, drugs, education, entertainment, materialism, the occult, and sex outside of marriage. Often times we discover that we have less peace than we did before we pursued the enemy’s counterfeit peace. It is that way with everything Satan promises to use to give us peace. Instead of giving us peace, Satan’s ways lead us into bondage and death.
What is Peace?
But God’s “peace” is real, and it protects us from the activities of the kingdom of darkness. But what is this “peace” God wants us to wear all the time? The Greek word for “peace” (eirēnē) in Ephesian 6:15 refers to a “state of concord, harmony, or well-being”[12] between Jews and Gentiles (Eph. 2:14-15) and between God and humankind (Eph. 2:16-18).
Jesus used this word for “peace” (eirēnē) twice in John 14:27 when He referred to two types of peace. The first kind refers to His work on the cross. “Peace I leave with you.” (John 14:27a). The word “leave” (aphiēmi) implies something that Jesus does. Christ’s death on the cross would provide eternal “peace with God” (Rom. 5:1) for us because all our sins would be forgiven (Acts 10:43; Col. 2:13-14). The meaning of “peace” in this case “is the spiritual well-being that results from being rightly related to God through Jesus Christ.” [13]
The second type of peace in verse 27 is the kind that Jesus enjoyed on earth. He says, “My peace I give to you” (John 14:27b). In the context (cf. John 14:21, 23), this peace of Christ’s is given to obedient believers. It arises from a life of faith in God. It refers to a calmness “that would come to their hearts from trusting God and from knowing that He was in control of all events that touched their lives.”[14]
Christ distinguishes His peace from the kind of peace the world can give – “not as the world gives do I give to you.” (John 14:27c). The world cannot offer eternal peace with God. The world denies that people need to be reconciled to God. The world says that people are inherently good because they are created in the image of God. “Because God loves everyone,” the world says, “There is no need for reconciliation with God.” The world offers a false peace to people. Sin has distorted God’s image in people. Some churches deny this because the world has influenced them to believe that people are inherently good and do not need a Savior.
The peace the world offers depends on one’s circumstances and is temporary. Itis deceptive and misleading. But the peace Jesus offers is the calm and tranquility of the soul that is independent of our external situation. [15]
This peace is much like the painting above.[16] The sky is black with storm clouds. The waves are violently billowing up and down against the rocky shore. There is turmoil and chaos all around.
But on the right side of this portrait about halfway up the rocky cliff at the edge of this horrific circumstance of life, was a mother bird sitting on her nest protecting her young. One little light piercing the darkness of the clouds was shining down on the bird as it sat peacefully on its nest.
This picture portrays biblical peace. Biblical peace is not the absence of problems. It is not “when nothing is wrong, I am calm.”Biblical peace is when everything is wrong, and we are still calm. It is when circumstances or situations are not conducive to rest, but we are able to chill. Biblical peace is when there is calm on the inside while there is nothing but chaos on the outside. We do not know we have biblical peace until circumstances are not peaceful.
When Jesus spoke of His peace in John 14:27, it was the night before His crucifixion. There was nothing peaceful about Jesus’ situation. He knew it would involve terrible darkness when all hell would break loose against Him and He would experience separation from His heavenly Father for the first and last time when the sin of the world would be placed upon Christ as our Substitute for sin (cf. 2 Cor. 5:21; I Pet. 3:18). Yet Jesus could speak with confidence about giving His peace to His disciples the night before His brutal death on a cross. Christ lived this peace, and He wants to empower us to do the same.
Where Do We Find this Peace?
This third piece of armor speaks of standing in “the preparation of the gospel of peace” (Eph. 6:15). The “peace” that Jesus gives us is found in “the gospel.” This peace is not found in a pill or an injection or in entertainment or in the accumulation of wealth. It is not found in our favorite television program or movie. Nor is it found on a vacation or in an image on the computer screen. This peace is not found in a better job or in a counseling session. That’s the world’s kind of peace which is momentary.
The peace that God wants us to continually wear on our feet is found in “thegospel.” To understand the “peace” that the apostle Paul is talking about, we need to understand the gospel. The Greek word for “gospel” is euangelion, which means “good news.”[17] So, what is the good news?
The apostle Paul defines the “gospel” or good news by which we are saved today when he writes, “3 that Christ died for our sin according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. 6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once…” (I Cor. 15:3-6). The gospel is that Christ died for our sins and rose from the dead. We are saved from an eternity in hell when we believe in the good news of Jesus’ death and resurrection as our Substitute for our sins (Acts 16:31). At that moment of faith in Christ, we receive both the complete forgiveness of all our sins (Acts 10:43; Col. 2:13-14) and the gift of eternal life (John 3:14-16). Jesus says we are born again (John 3:3). But you may say, “I am born again but I still have anxiety and worry – the opposite of peace.”
One reason we may still have worry after we are born again is because we do not understand or believe the gospel. Most Christians apply the gospel only to what it takes to get to heaven. But that is just part of the gospel. The gospel also has a lot to do with living a victorious life on earth. [18]
The apostle Paul writes, “For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.” (Rom. 5:10). Notice that “the death of” Jesus “reconciled” (past tense) us to God so we could go to heaven (justification), but Jesus’ “life” “shall” (future tense) save us from the power of sin and its consequences (sanctification) on earth (cf. Rom. 1:18-32; 5:9). [19] Most of us know the gospel because of Jesus’ death, but we have missed the gospel of His life which progressively gives us victory over the power of sin as we learn to walk in the Spirit (cf. Rom. 6:1-8:39).
Evans writes, “The death of Jesus reconciled us to God, but Jesus didn’t stay dead. He’s alive right now. And He’s interceding for us (see Heb. 7:25) in order to give us victory over the power of sin and its consequences. Think about it. If Jesus could take you from hell to heaven by dying, what He can do for you by living is even more exciting. Many believers who have accepted the saving death of Christ have yet to understand and access the saving life of Christ, which gives us victory in history.”[20] [emphasis added]
Let’s look now at what our sandals of peace include. [21]
Our Position that Protects our Mental Peace
These sandals of peace include our POSITION THAT PROTECTS OUR MENTAL PEACE: “Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” (Rom. 5:1). The Greek word translated “justified” (diakaioō) means to be declared totally righteous [22] by our holy God [23] in heaven’s courtroom. The perfect righteousness of Christ in us has been imputed or credited to our account in heaven by virtue of our position in Jesus.[24]
“Justification is a legal concept meaning that in God’s courtroom, He pronounced us innocent of all charges. He does this through what theologians call ‘imputation’—taking Jesus’s perfect record and crediting it to our accounts.” [25] [emphasis added]
Notice in Romans 5:1 that we are “justified” not by our good life, prayers, or religion, but “by faith.” Peace with God is “through our Lord Jesus Christ.” The moment we believe in Jesus Christ and His death on the cross for all our sins, we are “justified” or declared totally righteous before God as if we had never sinned.
The preposition “with” (pros) in the phrase “peace with God” (pros ton Theon) is very important (Rom. 5:1). This preposition used with the accusative case (ton Theon) refers to being “friendly with” God. [26] It is the promise that through justification by faith in Jesus, the enmity and hostility that existed between a holy God and a sinful people is totally removed. The war has ended between the Christian and his or her God! And we have peace “with God.”
How does the Christian know he has peace “with” God? There is only one way to know this, and it is through faith in God’s promise. Justification before God is not a feeling or experience. It is a judicial, legal declaration from a holy God.
“The nature of this peace is of course judicial, since justification is the act of God as our Judge. We should avoid understanding the idea as inner tranquility. The peace involved here is like that which results when two warring nations are no longer in a hostile relationship to each other.”[27] [emphasis added]
That is why Romans 5:1 begins with the word “Therefore…” It is as though God is pointing His finger back to the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross (cf. Rom. 4:24-25). “Therefore,” because of what Jesus has done, you have “been justified by faith” and you “have peace with God.” The war with God is over! The battle has ended!
But Satan will try to rob Christians of this peace. He will attempt to make us think that God is angry with us. That God could never forgive us. That God is against us. He may whisper in our ears, “The reason you have so many troubles is because God is mad at you. Hekeeps punishing you because He is against you.”
While it is true that God disciplines His wayward children (Heb. 12:5-11), His discipline of us is not evidence that He hates us or is mad at us. It is evidence that He loves us: “5 My son, do not despise the chastening of the Lord, nor be discouraged when you are rebuked by Him; 6 for whom the Lord loves He chastens.” (Heb. 12:5-6).
Thus, putting on the sandals of peace means we have an intellectual understanding of what God’s Word says – that the believer in Jesus has “peace with God.” If we are to “stand” against the wiles of the devil (Eph. 6:11), we must know this positional truth, review it, and abide in it daily, never turning aside from it even during Satan’s most vicious or subtle attacks.
The Possession of Peace
But our sandals of peace also include our POSSESSION OF PEACE. This can be seen in Philippians 4. “6 Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; 7 and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.” (Phil. 4:6-7). This aspect of our sandals of peace protects our emotional peace (“anxious”). God wants the Christian to not only have legal or mental peace (“peace with God”), but to also have emotional peace (“peace of God”).
How do we gain this relationship of peace? It comes through the practice of prayer. When Paul writes in Philippians 4:6, “Be anxious for nothing…” (Phil. 4:6a), he is saying not to lose your emotional peace even though you may be facing a worrisome situation. Don’t try to resolve your anxiety by worrying about the situation. Instead, he says to resolve this worrisome situation with “prayer” (Phil. 4:6b). Talk to God about what makes you anxious. When was the last time we got alone with God and talked to Him about what we are worried about? Talking about it helps to diffuse the power of worry. But it does not stop there.
Then God says, “in everything by… supplication” (Phil. 4:6c). The word “supplication” means to tell God what you need. Few people ever identify what they need because they are so busy worrying.
For example, some of us may be worried about our health. So, we talk to the Lord about that. And as we do that, ask God to help us identify the underlying need. Perhaps we need protection from illness especially during the aftermath of COVID. Or perhaps we are afraid of death because we are not prepared for it. So, we need assurance of life after death. Ask God to give you the assurance that there is everlasting life both now and after death through believing in Jesus (cf. John 11:25-26). Thus, talk to the Lord about what you need from Him.
Next, God says, “with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God” (Phil. 4:6d). One of my mentors taught me that the word “requests” refers to our heart’s desires which align with God’s will. Psalm 37:4 says, “Delight yourself also in the Lord, and He shall give you the desires of your heart.” The Hebrew word for “delight” (anog) can mean “to be soft” [28] or lean toward God. Just as a house plant leans in toward the sunlight coming through a window to get nutrients from the sun, so we need to lean into God during these challenging times to nourish our souls, and He promises to give us the desires or dreams of our hearts. So, talk to God about your desires or dreams. Ask God what He wants to do in your life.
Notice that God wants us to pray with “thanksgiving.” He wants us to have a thankful heart. Why? Because when we trust God to supply our needs and wants in advance during difficult times, we can accept those circumstances and respond more appropriately. Also, gratitude stimulates the release of dopamine (happy chemical) in our brain which decreases our stress and enhances our sleep.
As we talk to God about our anxiety, needs, and desires with thanksgiving, He promises that “the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus” (Phil. 4:7). The “peace of God” is like a deep calmness in the midst of life’s storms. For example, the water underneath the surface of the ocean remains calm during a storm (see above pic). We can experience a deep-seeded calmness in our souls when we surrender to God in prayer as we face these challenging times.
The phrase “will guard,” pictures an armed soldier walking back and forth in front of the city gate, protecting the occupants inside the city from intruders. God’s peace constantly protects those who choose to talk to Him about their worries and ask Him for what they need and want.
Do we know this experientially? Are we practicing this kind of prayer? We live in a day of cell phones. If someone wants to get a hold of us, they send us a text or call us on our phones. Our phones alert us through vibration or a distinct sound that someone wants to talk to us.
This illustrates how God sometimes wants us to talk to Him in prayer. One of the ways God may alert us to His desire for us to talk to Him is by allowing us to feel uneasy or anxious about something. This may be His way of inviting us to spend time alone with Him in prayer. Putting on the sandals of peace includes practicing this kind of prayer.
The Protection of Peace
Our sandals of peace also include THE PROTECTION OF PEACE. The apostle Paul writes, “The things which you learned and received and heard and saw in me, these do, and the God of peace will be with you.” (Phil. 4:9). Paul is not talking about the “peace of God” in this verse, but “the God of peace.” This aspect of peace results when believers walk in obedience to God (“The things which you learned and received and heard and saw in me, these do…”). Paul says that when we follow the godly example of another believer, we can experience “the God of peace” being with us.
Bubeck suggests that “the God of peace” refers to the protection of our will. The strong powerful nearness of God to us (“the God of peace will be with you”) will protect our will. It is that “peace” which God brings to us when our enemies greatly outnumber us and are about to destroy us, and the God of peace says, “No more! You cannot touch him! He is mine!”[29]
There are many examples of this in the Old Testament when God’s people, Israel, are surrounded by their enemies who greatly outnumbered them and were about to destroy them with no apparent way of escape. And God’s people cried out to Him, and “the God of peace” showed up and put their enemies to flight or destroyed them. Sometimes He did this with hornets or sounds in the treetops (or heavens) which frightened them and caused confusion or fear, so they fled and were defeated (cf. Exod. 23:22-28; Deut. 7:17-22; Josh. 24:11-12; I Sam. 7:10-11; 2 Sam. 5:22-25; 2 Kgs. 6:8-23; 18:1-19:37; I Chron. 14:13-17; 2 Chron. 31:1-22). And at other times God caused Israel’s enemies to turn against each other so they could be defeated (cf. 2 Chron. 20:1-24).
God is so powerful that “when a man’s ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him.” (Prov. 16:7). God is able to make our enemies be at peace with us quickly when we live in a way that pleases Him. They will have to flee simply because of Who God is.
It is not surprising that the phrase “the God of peace” is used in the New Testament in the context of obedience and Christian growth (cf. Rom. 15:33; 16:20; 2 Cor. 13:11; Phil. 4:9; I Thess. 5:23; Heb. 13:20-21). If we are hurting in our peace, it is important to examine our obedience to God. Are we trying to walk our own way instead of God’s way? Are we seeking our own pleasure instead of God’s?
The Lord may let us walk our own way, but please know that “the God of peace will be with” us. He wants us to be near to Him but that cannot be our experience if we are walking our own way instead of His way.
The Person of Peace
These sandals of peace also include THE PERSON OF PEACE. “13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. 14 For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation.” (Eph. 2:13-14). Our sin not only separates us from God, but it also separates us from the people of God. The Ephesians were Gentiles who were called “Uncircumcision” by the Jews who are referred to as “the Circumcision” (Eph. 2:11).
In their unsaved condition before the Cross, Ephesians 2:12 tells us that Gentiles “were without Christ,” having no corporate national hope centered on the promise of a coming Messiah, as the Jews did. They were “aliens from the commonwealth of Israel” in that God excluded them in having a part in what He planned to do in and through the nation of Israel. The Gentiles were “aliens” from Israel in this sense. [30] Nor did Gentiles have a direct part in the “promises” of God to Israel contained in the biblical covenants (e.g., Abrahamic – Gen. 12:1-3; 13:15-17; 15:17-21; 17:1-22; Mosaic – Exod. 19:1-24:8; and Davidic – 2 Sam. 7:12-17; I Chron. 17:3-14; 2 Chron. 7:17-18; 13:5; 21:7; Psa. 89:1-4; et al.). As a race of people, the Gentiles had “no hope” of a corporate future promised by God to which they could look and in which they could hope, as Israel did. [31] And worst of all, they were “without God in the world.” The Greek word translated “without God” (atheos) is where we get our English word “atheist” from. Before the cross, Gentile unbelievers may have worshiped many gods, but they were without the one and only true God. [32]
“But… the blood of Christ” not only brought us “near” to God, but it also brings Jews and Gentiles (“you who once were far off”) near to one another (Eph. 2:13). How did this take place? “For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation.” (Eph. 2:14). Jesus is “our peace” Whose atoning sacrifice on the cross has made Jew and Gentile “both one,” having “broken down the middle wall of separation.”
What is this “middle wall of separation”? The next verse tells us: “…Having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace.” (Eph. 2:15). Jesus “abolished in His flesh” by dying on the cross “the enmity” or hostility that was created by the Jewish “law of commandments contained in ordinances.”
The Mosaic Law had been the cause of the hostility between Jews and Gentiles. It was the “barrier” that separated Jews and Gentiles. Its dietary distinctions, and laws requiring separation in particular, created hostility between Jews and Gentiles. Jesus Christ broke down the barrier and the hostility that resulted from it by terminating the Mosaic Law. When Jesus Christ died, He fulfilled all the demands of the Mosaic Law (cf. Col. 2:14). When He did that, God ended the Mosaic Law as His rule of life for the Jews. The word “abolished” (katargeō) means to “cause something to come to an end or to be no longer in existence, wipe out.”[33] The Mosaic Law ceased to be God’s standard for regulating the life of His people when Christ died (Rom. 10:4; Gal. 3:24-25; et al.). [34]
God did this through His shed blood on the cross to “create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace.” Christ died in our place “to make one body out of the two very distant groups. When a Jew or Gentile trusts in Christ for eternal life, he is placed in union with other believers in the Body of Christ. Jesus Christ by His death removed the barrier that separated Jews and Gentiles. By faith they become one new man, the Body of Christ, the Church. Christ is the end of the Law to all who believe (Rom. 10:4).
“God reconciled both Jews and Gentiles to Himself in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity (between Gentiles and Jews who believe in Christ). The Law that divided is removed, and Jews and Gentiles are in one body together.” [35] [emphasis added]
Christ, Who is “our peace,” died “that He might reconcile” Jews and Gentiles “to God in one body,” the church, “through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity” created by the Jewish Law (Eph. 2:16).
This Person of peace protects our spirit. It has to do with our spiritual relationship with Jesus. [36] Our Christian faith is not primarily a system of dogmas and doctrines. It is primarily a relationship with a Person – Jesus Christ. This is a relationship that we enter into through faith alone in Christ alone (Eph. 1:13-14; 2:8-9). As we grow closer to Jesus, the more we can experience Him as “our peace” and the more we can live peaceably with other Christians. Satan seeks to divide Christians, so they do not express the image of God by living peacefully in unity with one another. But Jesus Christ is “our peace” and He is the source of reconciliation and restoration of peace within His body, the church.
God wants His peace to be the norm for His children on the battlefield. When God’s truth is operative in our lives, it will point us in the direction of His righteousness. We are faced with a myriad of choices and decisions in life, but how do we know we have made the right choices or decisions? How do we know we are moving in the right direction? How do we know we have the right perspective on a matter? God’s peace will confirm it. The Lord will give us a deep-seeded calm to move forward (“feet” suggest movement) with a decision even though hell may be breaking loose in our lives.
But if anxiety or worry is our normal way of operating, then we are not wearing the shoes God has given us. Please note that I am not talking about certain times of worry because we all battle that in our flesh. But if worry is normative for us then these shoes or sandals of peace are not being worn on our feet.
Are we wearing our sandals of peace every day? Do we take time to put them on? Are we taking time to remember and review that we have “peace with God” now because God has declared us (not made us) to be totally righteous (“justified”) the moment we believed in Jesus (Rom. 5:1)? Are we experiencing the emotional “peace of God” through prayer and the fullness of the Holy Spirit’s presence in our lives (Phil. 4:6-7)? Through obedience, are we experiencing “the God of peace” (Phil. 4:9) Who makes even our enemies to be at peace with us (Prov. 16:7)? And are we getting to know the Person of “our peace” (Eph. 2:13-17) more intimately, so we can live more peaceably with our brothers and sisters in Christ? In the midst of war, God wants us to stand victoriously in “the gospel of peace.”
Submarine crewmen do not get nervous when there is a storm at sea because they can go deep down where the waters are calm. Fish do not have anxiety attacks when it is storming because they know that severe storms will only reach approximately three hundred feet below sea level, [38] so they go down three hundred and one feet where it is peaceful.
When our world gets chaotic, it is time for us to go deep into the spiritual realm where God says there is peace and calm. God will give us “perfect peace” when our mind is focused on Him (Isa. 26:3). Instead of retreating to the world for its false sense of peace, we need to redirect our attention to the mind of God. When our thoughts agree with God’s, we will experience His peace.
For example, [39] when the three Hebrew young men, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who had been promoted “over the affairs of the province of Babylon where they were captives” (Dan. 3:49), refused to serve the gods of Babylon and worship the ninety-foot-tall gold statue (Dan. 3:1) of king Nebuchadnezzar, they were told by the king they would be “cast immediatelyinto the midst of a burning fiery furnace” (Dan. 3:15). When these three young men heard this news that they were about to be burned alive – which, by the way, would normally obliterate anyone’s sense of peace – they responded to Nebuchadnezzar saying, “16 O Nebuchadnezzar, we have no need to answer you in this matter. 17 If that is the case, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and He will deliver us from your hand, O king. 18 If not, let it be known to you, O king, that we do not serve your gods, nor will we worship the gold image which you have set up.” (Dan. 3:16b-18).
Their response infuriated Nebuchadnezzar, so he commanded his servants to “heat the furnace seven time more than it was usually heated” (Dan. 3:19b). The king was extremely upset that these Hebrew men feared their God more than the king’s death threat, so he had them tied up and thrown “into the midst of the burning fiery furnace” (Dan. 3:20-21). The flames of the furnace were so intense that the mighty men carrying them were “killed” (Dan. 3:22). Keep in mind that these three men were wearing several layers of clothing (Dan. 3:21) which were most likely flammable, so there appeared to be no hope of their survival.
After a while, the king looked into the furnace and he was shocked to “see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire” (Dan. 3:25a)because they had only thrown three men into the furnace. And now he sees four of them, and the three men were no longer tied up. They were “walking” around in the midst of these intense flames full of peace and calm, “and they are not hurt” (Dan. 3:25b). How was this possible? Because there was a fourth Person with them in the fire and the kings says He had “the form… like the Son of God.” (Dan. 3:25c). This was the pre-incarnate Lord Jesus Christ Who joined them in this terrible circumstance. God’s presence protected them from the fire (cf. Isa. 43:2).
It is important to understand that God is not going to join the world to help us out if we retreat to the world to find peace. If we are conforming to the world’s values and allurements and get into a bad situation as a result, and then cry out to God, He is not going to join the world because then He would be compromising His peace to join the world’s peace. These men did not bow to the king of Babylon. They remained faithful to God even though they did not know for sure if He would deliver them from this terrible situation.
Instead of looking to the world for peace, God wants us to take a stand in this pagan world with our minds focused on the God of peace. When we do this, the God of peace will show up in the fiery trials of life and give us His peacewhich surpasses human understanding. His presence will remove the chains or ropes that bind us so we can move freely. His presence will deliver us from the intense fires of life.
Some of us may be facing some very significant fiery trials right now. Maybe we have lost our job or lost our health. Perhaps we have lost a relationship with a loved one. God wants us to go deep into the spiritual realm to connect with His mind so His peace can be ours. He wants us to wear these shoes of peace at all times.
How do we do this? As with the other pieces of armor, we can put on our shoes of peace through prayer (Eph. 6:18).
Prayer: Lord Jesus, we are living in an increasingly chaotic world that lacks Your peace. We praise You because You not only brought us peace, but You are also our peace. Protect us from anything that would rob us of Your peace. Please help us to wear our sandals of peace every day so we may stand victoriously against the trickery of the Devil. We claim the peace with God that is ours through justification by faith alone in Jesus alone (Rom. 5:1). We desire the peace of God that touches our emotions and feelings through prayer (Phil. 4:6-7). Through our obedience, we seek the God of peace (Phil 4:9) Who makes even our enemies to live at peace with us. And we want to grow closer to You Jesus, because You are our peace. Satan and his kingdom of darkness are relentless in their efforts to keep believers divisive toward one another. As the accuser of believers, the Devil continually plants suspicions in our hearts. In the authority and name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we pull down that work of darkness and bind our enemy that he might not succeed. We ask the Holy Spirit to bring to a stop all divisive works active in our lives and in all the lives of other believers. The diversity of Your body, Lord Jesus, is part of its beauty and appeal to the lost. It adds to Your glory. Help us to love one another in our diversity. In Your precious and mighty name, we pray, Lord Jesus. Amen. [40]
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pp. 247-248.
[2] Adapted from Tony Evans’ video message entitled “The Shoes of Peace” on youtube.com.
[3] Adapted from Mark Bubeck’s video message, “7. Peace in the Midst of War: Ephesians 6 Series,” on the BRMinistry app.
[4] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pg. 1037.
[5] Archibald Thomas Robertson, A. T. Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament, 2014 Kindle Location 154992.
[6] The Greek verb hupodēsamenoi is in the aorist or past tense, meaning “having shod.” As with the first two pieces of armor, this refers to the state we should always be in.
[7] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pg. 401.
[8] Tony Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2666.
[10] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2665.
[11] Evans’ video message entitled “The Shoes of Peace” on youtube.com.
[12] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pp. 287-288.
[13] J. Carl Laney, Moody Gospel John Commentary (Chicago: Moody Press, 1992), pg. 265.
[14] J. Dwight Pentecost, The Words and Works of Jesus Christ (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981), pg. 440.
[15] Evans’ video message entitled “The Shoes of Peace” on youtube.com.
[16] This portrait is used with permission from the artist, Katrina Case (see katrinacaseart.com).
[17] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pg. 402.
[18] Adapted from Evans’ video message entitled “The Shoes of Peace” on youtube.com.
[19] The theme of the book of Romans is the “salvation” or deliverance from God’s present-day wrath introduced in Romans 1:16-32. This deliverance includes justification through faith in Christ’s death (Rom. 2:1-5:9a, 10a) and sanctification through faith in Christ’s life (Rom. 5:9b, 10b-8:39). See Zane C. Hodges, “Romans,” The Grace New Testament Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 966ff; Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2416ff; Joseph Dillow, Final Destiny: The Future Reign of The Servant Kings: Fourth Revised Edition (Grace Theology Press. 2018 Kindle Edition), pp. 198-199.
[20] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2430.
[21] Much of these next four sections are adapted from Bubeck’s video message, “7. Peace in the Midst of War: Ephesians 6 Series,” on the BRMinistry app, unless otherwise noted.
[22] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Romans, 2023 Edition, pg. 77.
[23] The Greek word translated “justified” (dikaiōthentes) is in the passive voice, indicating that God is the One Who justifies the believing sinner.
[24] David R. Anderson, Free Grace Soteriology: Third Edition (Grace Theology Press, 2018 Kindle Edition), pp. 115-116.
[25] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 2424-2425.
[26] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pg. 874.
[27] Hodges, The Grace New Testament Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 1012.
[28] Francis Brown, Samuel R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Omaha, NE: Patristic Publishing, 2020 Kindle Edition), pg. 2564.
[29] Bubeck’s video message, “7. Peace in the Midst of War: Ephesians 6 Series,” on the BRMinistry app.
[30] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Ephesians, 2024 Edition, pg. 59.
[39] Adapted from Evans’ video message entitled “The Shoes of Peace” on youtube.com.
[40] Adapted from Mark Bubeck’s prayers entitled, “Prayer for Christian Unity” and “Prayer to Wear the Armor of God,” from Spiritual Warfare Prayers pamphlet (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 1997).
In our spiritual warfare series, we are now looking at each piece of armor that a Christian is to wear to successfully stand against “the wiles” or deceptions of the devil (Eph. 6:10-13). The six pieces of armor that Paul presents to us are in the order that a Roman soldier would put them on. They are divided into two categories of three.
He introduces each of these two categories with different verbs. The first three are introduced with the verb “to be.” The last three are introduced with the verb “to take.” Why does Paul switch verbs halfway through the armament? He wants us to understand two specific, distinct orientations to the six pieces of armor. The first three relate to a state we should always be in. The last three are what we use on an as needed basis. [1]
The first three pieces of armor we have with us all of the time [2] (“having girded… put on… shod…” – Eph. 6:14-15). [3] This is the state we are always in. But the last three pieces of armor we are called to take and use as needed [4] (“taking … take…” Eph. 6:16-17), [5] especially “in the evil day” (Eph. 6:13b) when all hell breaks loose and seeks to steal, kill, and destroy us (John 10:10a).
Last time we looked closely at the first piece of armor, the belt of truth (Eph. 6:14a), which teaches us that Satan wants to deceive us or trick us to do what is contrary to God’s will. This piece of armor enables us to overcome the lies and deceptions of the devil.
Truth is the absolute standard by which reality is measured.[6] It is God’s viewpoint on any subject. We can defeat Satan by reaching out and putting on each citadel of truth God has given us through prayer: The Person of Truth (John 1:14; 14:6; Rom. 13:14), The Spirit of Truth (John 14:26; 15:26; 16:13-14; I John 2:20-27), the Word of Truth (John 17:17; 8:31-32; Psa. 119:9, 11, 28-29, 43, 160; 2 Tim. 2:15; 3:16-17; and the Church, the Pillar and Foundation of Truth (I Tim. 3:15). [7]
The Breastplate
After a Roman soldier puts his belt on over his tunic (a loose, sleeveless shirt that reaches to his knees) to provide mobility in battle and serve as a place on which he could hang his armor, he then puts on his “breastplate” (thōraka). The breastplate was usually made of bronze or chain mail and covered the soldier’s body from his neck to his thighs, [8] protecting the vital organs in the chest area and below, [9] including his heart, lungs, liver, spleen, stomach, and intestines. And it also covered his back so that from the top of his spine to below his kidneys, he was protected from the thrust of the enemy’s spear or sword. [10] This is a vital piece of armor designed to protect a Roman soldier. Knowing this about the soldier’s breastplate ought to help us realize how vitally important this piece of armor is to the Christian.
The Bible instructs us, “Keep your heart with all diligence, for out of it spring the issues of life.” (Prov. 4:23). Just as the physical heart is central to our physical well-being, pumping life-giving blood and giving us functionality in every part of our being, so God has given us a spiritual heart that pumps His life throughout all our spiritual relationships. And since our battle with the kingdom of darkness is spiritual, our spiritual heart becomes the pump that gives us spiritual victory. [11]
Therefore, God has given us a special piece of armor called the “breastplate of righteousness.” This righteousness stands as our position with God which cannot be touched or altered by the enemy. It has been eternally settled in heaven’s courtroom. However, to be victorious on earth, our position in heaven must be matched with our practice on earth. Thus, once we learn what our position with God is, we can then align our practice with that position. And when we do that, God is free through the Holy Spirit to pump His life through our life, so we live life as God intended it to be lived, overriding Satan’s attempts and attacks to bring defeat into our Christian lives. [12]
Last time we discovered that we begin dressing for success in spiritual warfare by putting on the belt of truth (Eph. 6:14a). Truth is God’s viewpoint on a matter. So, in spiritual warfare, we start with truth by finding out what God thinks about a certain subject.
Then we are to put on “the breastplate of righteousness” (Eph. 6:14b). The breastplate Christians are to put on is “righteousness.” The word “righteousness” (dikaiosunē) refers to the quality of “being right”[14] as God defines it.
“Righteousness”is not “better than others,” or “good enough,” but right, as in, “right with God.”[15]
“Righteousness is the standard God requires for people to become acceptable to Him.”[16] This standard is based upon the truth. The truth is the informational base that tells me the right thing to do.
The opposite of righteousness is wrongness. Wrongness is functioning or operating in opposition to the truth. But truth is whatever God says about a subject regardless of how many people agree or disagree with Him. Righteousness is my response to God’s truth.
In basketball, the basketball hoop is ten feet high. That is the standard of the basketball goal if you are playing basketball. If we lower the basketball hoop, we have lowered the standard.
What a lot of people do in relation to God, is lower the standard and shoot, and make the shot, and think they did something that is acceptable to the Lord. They adjusted God’s standard of righteousness to a level they could attain, and concluded they are okay to God, when in reality they were not. They had lowered the divine standard to a human standard.
Until we operate on God-based truth that gives us the standard of God’s righteousness, we are not going to align with God’s standard of righteousness. Why is this so important?
How Satan Attacks Us in the Area of Righteousness[17]
Since the opposite of God’s righteousness is wrongness, when we do not align with God’s righteousness in our Christian lives, we are going to be very vulnerable to spiritual attack. Because Paul is talking about spiritual warfare and “wickedness in heavenly places” (Eph. 6:12), we need to understand that demons function on wrongness. Wrong is not just wrong. It is also an invitation to demons to join the wrongness.
Evans illustrates this by saying that when we leave trash laying around our house for too long of a time, we don’t just have trash to deal with. The unaddressed trash invites roaches, ants, mice, and rats to join the party. When food has been left out for too long of a time, one roach tells another roach that they have been invited into the house. So, in addition to the trash in the house, we now have unwanted guests.
God wants us to understand that unrighteousness (trash) is an invitation to demons (roaches) to join our “trashiness,” so we are not just dealing with unrighteousness (trash), we are also having to deal with demons who have made their home in our unrighteousness. And just as trash invites a variety of unwanted guests (e.g., ants, roaches, mice, rats, etc.,), so our unrighteousness invites a variety of demons of all sizes, shapes, and dispositions.
Our unrighteousness invites the demonic flow and blocks the movement of God. Hence, two things happen with our unrighteousness. Demons are invited into our wrongness, which makes a bad place worse. And God is blocked out. Thus, God’s movement in our lives is limited because we are not wearing the breastplate of righteousness.
Our unrighteousness gives Satan a legal right to occupy a place in our lives (cf. Eph. 4:25-27). We have invited the enemy to take up ground in our Christian lives. We have given him control over that part of our Christian lives. We can pray all we want about the roaches in the house, but until we remove the trash in the house, we are still going to have those unwanted guests. Why? Because those roaches (demons) have a legal right to be there because we are saying to them, “I am feeding you today.” As long as we continue in unrighteousness, no amount of praying is going to remove the demonic presence in our lives. They will not listen to our prayers because we are still feeding them with our trash.
As Christians, we often settle for trash management. We know we should not have the trash (unrighteousness), and we don’t want the roaches (demons), so we try to manage the trash.
For example, when we invite people to our house, we want our house to appear to be clean. So, we grab the trash and all the mess laying around, and we throw it in the closet. We want to keep our trash (unrighteousness) hidden so people will not know just how trashy (unrighteous) we truly are.
So, we present an appearance of godliness. We try to think, speak, and act righteously, but inwardly our trash (unrighteousness) is producing a stench. It’s like having a trash compactor in the house. We keep putting trash in it and it reduces the size of our garbage. But the problem is, if we don’t take that trash out, eventually it will fill the house with its unwanted stench. And our spouse will get a whiff of that trash scent, and she will know it is there even if it is not visible, because there is a standard that has a scent to it.
God can detect the scent for unrighteousness. So even if we are good at managing our trash, packing it down, hiding it in the closet, the garage, or in the attic so people cannot see it, God still knows it is in our lives. All demons have done is go to the garage, the closet, or garage – wherever we are hiding the trash. They have not left the premises because they know that the trash (unrighteousness) is still occupying the space.
One does not have to be a Christian for long to understand how tenacious the Devil is with regard to his attacks against righteousness. We mentioned last time how each piece of armor teaches us how Satan can come against us. The Devil wants to devour us and destroy us in this area of righteousness (I Pet. 5:8). He primarily does this in two ways. [18]
The first way Satan attacks us in the area of righteousness is to accuse us of our lack of righteousness. From his book, Overcoming the Adversary, Mark Bubeck shares four contrasts between the way the Holy Spirit comes to us and the way the Devil approaches us.
The first contrast shows us that when the Holy Spirit comes to us, He seeks to show us that our infinite worth and value to God makes God desire our fellowship (Gen. 1:26-27; Psa. 139:1-23; Matt. 13:44-46; I Cor. 6:20-21). He delights in spending time with us (Psa. 17:8; 18:19; 149:4; Isa. 62:5; Zeph. 3:17). But Satan wants to convince us that we are so bad and so flawed that God would not want anything to do with us.
The second contrast teaches us that when the Holy Spirit comes to us, He seeks to show us that there is forgiveness and restoration available to us no matter how often or badly we have sinned (Psa. 23:3; 32:1-11; 51:1-13; 103:3, 10-14; Micah 7:19; John 21:15-17; Acts 10:43; Col. 2:13-14; I John 1:7, 9). But when the Devil comes to us, he seeks to persuade us that there is no forgiveness nor restoration available to us. He tells us we have committed the unpardonable sin [19] and that we are so bad that Satan deserves to have us forever!
The third contrast instructs us that when the Holy Spirit comes to us, He uses God’s Word to give us hope and assurance of God’s love and forgiveness (cf. Rom. 5:1-8; 8:1, 5-6, 31-39). But when Satan approaches us, he takes God’s Word out of context to try to convince us that there is no hope for us; that God could not possibly ever forgive us.
The fourth and final contrast shows that when the Holy Spirit comes to us, He builds faith, hope, and love in our hearts and increases our confidence in the assurance of our salvation (John 6:35-40; 10:28-29; I Cor. 13:13; I Thess. 5:8; I John 2:25-26; 5:1, 13). On the other hand, when Satan comes to us, he creates doubt, despair, and resentment toward God and toward His Word and His people. He wants to convince us that no one as bad as us could ever be saved and get into heaven.
The second way Satan attacks us is to tempt us to compromise God’s righteousness. Satan seeks to convince us that it is not important to live according to the righteous standards God has given us in the Bible and even in our own conscience which many times has been made sensitive by the Holy Spirit and God’s Word.
The Devil seeks to get us to compromise the difference between right and wrong. He may say things to us like, “It won’t hurt you to try that especially if it helps you get what you want.” “Everyone else is doing it, so it must be okay.” “Go ahead and do it. It’s fun.” “No one else has to know.” “It doesn’t matter if you participate in a little worldliness. God understands your needs.” “It is only a weakness.” “This is the only way you can endure stress or face pain.” “You cannot change.”
On the other hand, when we do fail, Satan will come and try to persuade us that we have no righteousness; that we are not worthy before God at all. When we yield to sin repeatedly, without confessing or forsaking it, Satan has a right to claim that area we have compromised (Eph. 4:25-27).
Putting on the breastplate of righteousness means we combat these two ways that Satan attacks us in this area of God’s righteousness. It is at the very heart of the battle against the enemy.
But what does it mean to put on the breastplate of righteousness? What is required to put on this piece of armor? First, we need a doctrinal understanding of the three types of God’s righteousness.
Imputed Righteousness
The word “impute” is not a common word that we use today, but the apostle Paul uses it in Romans 4 when he refers to Old Testament examples of justification by faith. For example, when he refers to David and Abraham’s examples of faith alone for justification, he writes, “5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works… 21 And [Abraham] being fully convinced that what He had promised He was also able to perform. 22 And therefore ‘it was accounted to him for righteousness.’ 23 Now it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to him, 24 but also for us. It shall be imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead… ” (Rom. 4:5-6, 21-24). [brackets added] The word “impute” (logizomai) in these verses means the perfect “righteousness” of God is “credited” or “placed to one’s account.”[20]
We may not be as familiar with the word “impute,” but the word “credit” probably speaks volumes to us. Anderson writes, “We have credit cards, we have a credit score, or we may have credit at the bank. If the bank were to ‘credit something to our account,’ we know what that means. And that is exactly what ‘impute’ means. When we trust Jesus as our Savior, His perfect life of righteousness is credited to our account in heaven.
“Philippians 4:17 says that we have an account in heaven. This account has a debit column and a credit column. As unbelievers we had an account full of debits and no credits. Isaiah 64:6 says all of our righteous deeds were like dirty rags. This doesn’t mean I had no righteous deeds. I did. That’s why they were called righteous deeds. The problem is these righteous deeds don’t go into the credit column of our account in heaven. They’re called rags by Isaiah because they‘re not acceptable to God. Why? Because they were produced by my own human energy and strength. They were deeds of human righteousness and not divine righteousness.”[21] [emphasis added]
All our righteous deeds are stained with sin according to Isaiah 64:6. Hence, all our righteous deeds cannot open the gates of heaven. For example, “When Bill Gates claims he does not believe in God, let alone Christ, and gives a billion dollars to help theproblem of AIDS in Africa, that is most certainly a righteous deed. But that righteous deed wouldnot open the gates of heaven for him. It does not go into the credit column of his account. Why? Because to get into heaven we have to be perfect.”[22] [emphasis added]
This is what Jesus taught in His Sermon on the Mount. He said, “For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matt. 5:20). The scribes and Pharisees were considered by Jesus’ Jewish audience to be the most righteous people of that day. But Jesus says the “righteousness” of His audience must exceed the righteousness of these religious leaders to enter the kingdom of heaven. Whose righteousness would surpass these devoted religious leaders’ righteousness? Later, in the same chapter, Christ says, “Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.” (Matt. 5:48). Only the righteousness of God is “perfect.”[23]
It is important to understand that Jesus was speaking to both believers (“His disciples” – Matt. 5:1) and the unbelieving “multitudes” who had followed Him (Matt. 4:24-5:1). He was using His Sermon on the Mount to provide a standard of conduct for His believing disciples as they anticipate living in the coming Kingdom of God on earth. But Christ also uses His Sermon on the Mount to convict His unsaved audience of their need for God’s imputed righteousness through faith alone in Christ alone (cf. Rom. 3:21-4:24). [24]
Anderson adds, “Anything short of perfection will not do. There’s not a great scale in the sky on which God will put our debits on one side and our credits on the other side and accept us if our credits outweigh our debits. No, just one sin is one too many. That’s why when Satan committed one sin in heaven, he had to go. He was cast out of heaven.
“So that leaves us with a big problem. The Bible says that all men fall short of the glory of God, which includes His perfect holiness. These sins go into our debit column. In order for us to go to heaven we need two things: we need to have the debits swept away, and we need to have a life of perfect righteousness. Since none of us can live the life of perfect righteousness, we must look to another.
“Only Jesus Christ lived a perfect life, and when we trust in His work for us on the cross, our sins are wiped away because He took our sins upon Himself. But, secondly, His perfect life is credited to our account. That’s divine righteousness. When this is credited to our account, we have a new standing before God. Our new position is in Christ. And since we are in Christ, we are seated at the right hand of God the Father in heavenly places (Col. 3:1-3) [see also Eph. 1:19-21; 2:5-6]. And nothing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus (Rom. 8:39).”[25] [emphasis and brackets added]
Notice in Romans 4:5 that God “justifies” or declares righteous the “ungodly” person who “believes,” not behaves (“work”). It is the believing person’s “faith” that “is accounted for righteousness.” The moment we believe in Jesus Christ and His death on the cross for all our sins, God “justifies” or declares us totally righteous before Him as if we had never sinned.
Hence, when a sinner believes in Jesus, he or she is declared by our holy God to be the opposite of what they are. So, if we were deceitful before our conversion, God declares us to be truthful. If we were greedy, God declares us to be generous. If we were hateful, God announces us to be loving. If we were impatient, God says we are patient. If we were promiscuous, God declares us to be pure at the moment of faith in Christ. If we were proud, God declares us to be humble. If we were selfish, God declares us to be selfless.
However, there is a great deal of confusion today regarding the relationship between faith and works. Much of this confusion originates from a theologian and philosopher named Augustine (A.D. 354-430), who greatly influenced the soteriology (study of salvation) of Roman Catholics, the Reformers, and even Calvinists and Arminians today.
Augustine had a scant knowledge of New Testament Greek which “caused him to misunderstand diakaioō (δικαιόω), translating it in its present infinitive form, ‘to make righteous,’”[26]“as opposed to the defining truth of the Reformers that this word meant ‘to declare righteous.’ The distinction was enough to cause a schism in Western Christianity. Whereas the former meaning signified a change of character, the latter meaning referred to a change of standing. ‘To make righteous’ looked to one’s experience in life, but ‘to declare righteous’ looked to the courtroom of heaven. The temporal significance of the distinction in meanings was monumental. Augustine saw justification (the making of righteous character) as a life-long effort, whereas Luther understood that one could be ‘declared righteous’ in God’s court at a moment of time.”[27] [emphasis added]
This is extremely significant to understand. Martin Luther understood “court room” justification to mean “that one could be declared righteous (justified) in his position or standing before God, but still be sinful in his character and condition in his temporal body”[28] [emphasis added] – a truth that Augustine never understood.
Augustine was persuaded “that the character of Christ needed to be infused into the character of the sinner from regeneration at water baptism (usually of infants) until death in order for the person to be made righteous (justified) enough to enter God’s heaven. Even the vast majority of God’s elect would not pass muster, so they would be consigned to Purgatory until the final vestiges of sin could be eliminated from their character. Only then could they march confidently through heaven’s gates. So, for Augustine justification was a life-long process. In fact, Purgatory was a provision of God for those in whom the process had not been completed.”[29] [emphasis added]
What Augustine did was erroneously wed justification with sanctification. He confused entering the Christian life (justification) with living the Christian life (sanctification). This has led some teachers today to mistakenly front-load the gospel by requiring good works in order to get saved (Romanism & Traditional Protestantism). It has led other teachers to backload the gospel by requiring good works to stay saved (Arminianism) or good works as a necessary proof of genuine salvation (Calvinism), so that in each case you MUST HAVE GOOD WORKS to ultimately go to heaven. Consider these options which are taught today:
Scenario
Faith in Jesus Christ +good works = maybe heaven
Faith in Jesus Christ =maybe heaven if you maintain good works, confess your sins, remain faithful, etc.
Faith in Jesus Christ = salvation + good works to ultimately arrive at heaven
Proponents
Romanism & TraditionalProtestantism
Arminianism
Calvinism
Each of these scenarios requires good works in order to ultimately arrive in God’s heaven. This is NOT God’s grace. “But if it is of works, it is no longer grace.” (Rom. 11:6). Good works are not the means of obtaining or maintaining salvation but are designed to be the result of receiving God’s free gift of salvation (Eph. 2:8-10). When good works are required to enter heaven, how will you ever know when you have done enough? You won’t until after you die.
Wiersbe correctly states, “Do not confuse justification and sanctification. Sanctification is the process whereby God makes the believer more and more like Christ. Sanctification may change from day to day. Justification never changes. When the sinner trusts Christ, God declares him righteous, and that declaration will never be repealed. God looks on us and deals with us as though we had never sinned at all!”[30] [emphasis added]
In case you doubt that we need to be “justified” or declared totally righteous before a holy God, it is important to understand our condition before we come to faith in Christ. The Bible tells us, “And you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works…” (Col. 1:21). Before we became Christians, “we were enemies” of God and needed to be “reconciled to” Him “through the death of His Son” (Rom. 5:10). The prophet Isaiah tells us, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned, everyone, to his own way; and the Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all” (Isa. 53:6). We need to be reconciled to God because of our sin. God does not need reconciling to us, we need reconciling to God. We turned away from God. He never moved. We moved. The people God created rebelled against their Creator and sinned so that death spread to all people because all sinned (Gen. 3:1-7; cf. Rom. 3:23; 5:12-14, 18a).
The non-Christian is described in Ephesians when Paul writes, “we all once conducted ourselves in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the others.” (Eph. 2:3). Because we were driven by our sinful lusts and desires, we were the objects of God’s “wrath” or displeasure before we became Christians. That is not a very likeable thought, is it?
The apostle John writes, “He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.” (John 3:36). The person who refuses to believe in Christ remains under God’s “wrath.” The non-believer remains God’s enemy.
How does the Christian know he or she is justified or declared totally righteous before God? There is only one way to know this, and it is through faith in God’s promise. Justification before God is not a feeling or experience. It is a judicial, legal declaration from a holy God.
Logan explains why he believes the breastplate of righteousness refers to the imputed righteousness of God: “The reason for this is that when it comes to standing against the accuser, Christ is the only Person Who is totally blameless. Satan could point at no sin in Christ’s life (John 14:30), whereas you and I have plenty of things in our lives Satan can accuse us of, even things we have been forgiven of by Christ.
“That’s why we need to stand with Christ’s righteousness around us like a breastplate. When we stand in Christ, Satan has nothing to touch in us, nothing to accuse us of. The enemy and his underlings aren’t afraid of us, but they’re afraid of Christ.”[31] [emphasis added]
Imparted Righteousness
The second type of righteousness we need to understand from the Scripture is the imparted righteousness of God. When we believed in Christ, the perfect righteousness of God was imputed or credited to our account in heaven. We were declared totally righteous in our standing before God.
But when we believed in Jesus, God also imparted to us a new nature consisting of His righteousness and holiness. The apostle Paul writes, “20 But you have not so learned Christ, 21 if indeed you have heard Him and have been taught by Him, as the truth is in Jesus: 22 that you put off, concerning your former conduct, the old man which grows corrupt according to the deceitful lusts, 23 and be renewed in the spirit of your mind, 24 and that you put on the new man which was created according to God, in true righteousness and holiness.” (Eph. 4:20-24). Paul is telling us that we are not to live the way we used to live before we became Christians (Eph. 4:17-19) because we are not the people we used to be (Eph. 4:20-24).
We “have not so learned Christ” by engaging in the activities that characterized our lives before we became Christians (Eph. 4:20). To learn Christ, we must be in a relationship with Him whereby we “heard Him and have been taught by Him, as the truth is in Jesus” (Eph. 4:21). Remember, “truth” is God’s viewpoint on a matter and that is where we need to start.
The clothes of the “old man” (who we were before Christ) need to be “put off” before we can put on our new wardrobe. These old clothes refer to our “former conduct” as unsaved people who grew “corrupt according to the deceitful lusts” (Eph. 4:22). Lusts or sinful desires are “deceitful.” “They promise satisfaction but bring only an aftertaste of emptiness.”[32] Christians can permit their lusts or sinful desires to direct their decisions, leaving them defeated and discouraged.
Paul is saying to take off those dirty clothes and put on the new clothes of the “new man” (our new nature) which include “true righteousness and holiness” (Eph. 4:24). This new nature “was created according to God.” When we were born again through faith in Jesus, God deposited a righteous seed (new nature) within us called the “spirit” (Eph. 4:23). [33]
The apostle John speaks of this new nature in his first epistle: “Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.” (I John 3:9). John had just stated that “the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil” (I John 3:8). The primary way that Christ destroys the work of the devil is to give believers (“whoever has been born of God”) a new sinless self (“His seed”) which “cannot sin” (I John 3:9). Since God cannot sin (I John 1:5), the divine nature He places inside His children cannot sin either. A sinless Parent cannot beget a sinful child. So, sin is never an act of the born-again nature inside us because it is incapable of sinning (I John 3:9) and because all sin is sourced in the devil (I John 3:8).
Anderson writes, “His divine nature is passed down through His divine seed. The new birth places His seed in us. Just as my physical seed cannot produce something outside its genetic code, so God’s seed cannot produce something contrary to His nature, that is, sin. God’s nature cannot produce sin. God’s nature in us (His seed) cannot produce sin.”[34] [emphasis added]
Many have wondered how this understanding can harmonize with John’s statement in I John 1:8 that Christians who say they have no sin are self-deceived. Hodges explains: “In 1:8 John warns, ‘If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves.’ But in 3:9 he says, ‘whoever has been born of God does not sin.’ As total persons, believers do sin and can never claim to be free of it, but their ‘inward self’ that is regenerated does not sin.
“In describing his struggle with sin Paul notes that two diverse impulses are at work. So he can say, ‘For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man. But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members’ (Rom 7:22-23; italics added). Previous to this he had concluded, ‘Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwells in me’ (v 20; italics added). His conclusion is simple; ‘So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin’ (v 24). At the core of his being (in his inward man) he does not and cannot sin. The inward man (the ‘regenerate self’) is absolutely impervious to sin, fully enslaved to God’s will. If sin occurs, it is not the inward man who performs it.
“Sin does exist in the Christian, but it is foreign and extraneous to his regenerated inner self, where Christ dwells in perfect holiness. Since Christ is eternal life (1 John 5:20), the one who possesses that life cannot sin because he is born of God. The divine seed (sperma) of that life remains (menō, ‘abides,’ ‘stays’) in him who is born again, making sin an impossibility at the level of his regenerate inward self.”[35] [emphasis added]
How we see ourselves determines how we live. The apostle Paul wants his Christian readers, including you and me, to see themselves as a “new man” who possesses a new nature at the core of their being which is “created according to God, in true righteousness and holiness”(Eph. 4:24) so they will manifest this righteous nature by living righteously. This type of Christian is represented by the above image on the left. He or she is visibly manifesting God’s righteous nature inside them by doing what is right. However, this is not what gets them to heaven. We will only go to heaven by receiving God’s gift of salvation by grace through faith alone in Christ alone (Eph. 1:13-14; 2:8-9). But manifesting our true identity by practicing Christ’s righteous behavior will glorify God now on earth (Matt. 5:16) and reap eternal rewards in the future at the Judgment Seat of Christ (cf. I Cor. 3:8-15; 2 Cor. 5:10).
On the other hand, a Christian who is yielding to his or her sinful flesh (“deceitful lusts”) is hiding his or her new righteous and holy nature inside them. This type of believer is represented by the image on the right. He or she is concealing his or her righteous and holy born-again nature by not living righteously. Failure to manifest their new nature through their actions does not jeopardize their salvation, but it does disrupt their fellowship with God and other believers (I John 1:3-10; 2:9-11; et al.) and forfeit eternal rewards in the future (I Cor. 3:8-15).
So how does a Christian move from putting off the old man that is corrupted by deceitful lusts (Eph. 4:22) to putting on the new man that is characterized by God’s “righteousness and holiness” (Eph. 4:24)? This leads to the third type of righteousness.
When God makes our inside righteous at the moment of faith in Christ (imparted righteousness), He wants our outside to match (implemented righteousness). The way for a Christian to implement the righteous seed God has given him is to put off the clothes of the old man (Eph. 4:22) and put on the clothes of the new man (Eph. 4:24). How does he or she make that happen? The verse in between these two verses tells us how: “And be renewed in the spirit of your mind.” (Eph. 4:23).
When speaking of unbelievers, Paul uses words like “mind,” “understanding,” and “ignorance” (Eph. 4:17-18). The common denominator is their thinking. Our lifestyle too is controlled by our thoughts. So, the key to taking off the old and putting on the new is to “be renewed in the spirit of your mind.” (Eph. 4:23). Instead of going back to the mindset we had before Christ, we must “put on the new man,” which requires a new way of thinking, a “renewed… mind.”[37]
The more we make our home in God’s Word (Psa. 119:9, 11; John 15:7; I John 2:14b), the more the Holy Spirit brings our thoughts in line with His own so that we think thoughts after Christ (I Cor. 2:10-16). The renewing of our minds involves God’s thoughts merging with ours so we can know and do His will (Rom. 12:1-2).
What we are talking about here is the sanctification process which begins with our perfected and redeemed “spirit.” The Bible tells us, “Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.” (I Thess. 5:23). Notice the word order: “spirit, soul, and body.” God’s truth informs us that He has deposited a righteous and holy seed in our “spirit” (Eph. 4:23-24; cf. I John 3:9). This is our new nature.
Our “spirit” cannot receive any contaminated information because it has been sealed by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:13-14). Our “spirit” wants to lay hold of God’s truth. That is why Paul says, “I delight in the law of God according to the inward man.” (Rom. 7:22). The “inward man” (Rom. 7:22) is the “new man” or new nature that is righteous and holy (Eph. 4:24). It craves the Word of God.
Hence, when God’s truth says at the core of our being we were “created according to God, in true righteousness and holiness” (Eph. 4:24), our “spirit” snatches that truth up. As we continue to meditate on this truth from God, and our “spirit” takes it in, a release valve opens up. This release valve sends “righteousness” that is within our “spirit” out to our “soul.” Now our “soul” is becoming transformed into “righteousness,” not because our “body” has changed it, but because our “spirit” released “righteousness” into the “soul.” When the “soul” takes hold of this “righteousness” released by the “spirit,” it then tells the “body” it needs to think, speak, and act righteously. Since the “body” listens to the “soul,” and the “soul” now listens to the “spirit,” and the “spirit” listens to the truth of God’s Word, we end up being transformed into the “righteousness” of God.
Too many Christians are trying to manage “righteousness” by starting with the “body” instead of the “spirit.” They focus on behavior instead of belief. They work from the outside inward. This is backwards. We cannot fix ourselves.
How many addicts have said,“I am not going to do that anymore”? That is not a bad thing to say, but it does not work because the addict does not have the power to stop his unwanted behavior. If he did have the power, he would not be addicted.
God wants us to start with the innermost part of our being, the “spirit.” God starts with the inside and works outward. Released righteousness makes us righteous in the heart and mind first, and then in our actions. That is how the breastplate of righteousness functions.
If I told you I buried $1 million that is yours for the taking in your backyard, you would probably drop what you are doing right now and grab a shovel and run out into your backyard to start tearing it up. You are not going to answer your phone or check social media or change your clothes. You are going to streak out into your backyard and dig as deep and wide and for as long a time as it takes to uncover something of great value that has been buried deep down in your backyard. Every effort that you make to get to that $1 million will be worth it because it is so valuable. Once you dig it up, you can use it for so much more. [38]
When we trusted Christ for His gift of salvation, God deposited deep down within our spirit all the righteousness that belongs to Jesus Christ. But we cannot benefit from that righteousness unless we are willing to go down there with God’s truth and dig it up. Then God can release His righteousness within our “spirit” and send it out into our “soul” which will send it to our “body,” transforming our “spirit, soul, and body” into the likeness of Jesus Christ. That is the breastplate of righteousness. It will guard our spiritual heart so it can pump God’s life throughout our “spirit, soul, and body.”
Conclusion
How do we put on the breastplate of righteousness? The same way we are to put on all the pieces of God’s spiritual armor – by means of prayer. Paul concluded his teaching on the armor of God by inviting his readers to pray: “Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints.” (Eph. 6:18).
Prayer: Heavenly Father, thank You for providing the breastplate of righteousness to guard my spiritual heart so it can pump Your life throughout my spirit, soul, and body. I praise You for declaring me to be totally righteous in Your sight apart from any good works I do when I believe in Jesus Christ. I praise You for freely crediting Jesus’ perfect righteousness to my account in heaven so Satan cannot successfully accuse me or condemn me of wrongdoing in Your courtroom. Thank You that my salvation does not rely on my good works, nor my ability to keep rules and regulations, but on Jesus alone Who died in my place on the cross and rose from the dead. I praise You for depositing deep down in my spirit all the righteousness that belongs to Jesus Christ. Help me to appropriate that righteousness by faith as I dig deep with Your Word of truth so my spirit can release Your righteousness to my soul, and my soul can release that righteousness to my body, transforming my spirit, soul and body into Jesus’ likeness. Please help me, I pray, to manifest Your righteous and holy nature by doing what is right in Your eyes so my heart is protected from the assaults of the Devil. I beg You to strengthen and protect the most vulnerable places in my life with Your righteousness. In the mighty name of the Lord Jesus Christ, I pray. Amen.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Tony Evan’s video message at Dallas Theological Seminary (DTS) entitled, “The Armor of God,” on youtube.com.
[2] Tony Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2665.
[3] The first three verbs in Greek (perizōsamenoi… endysamenoi… hypodēsamenoi… ) are aorist middle participles which means they have already been put on by the soldier or Christian.
[4] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2665.
[5] The Greek verb translated “taking…” (analabontes) is an aorist active participle, meaning the Christian is taking the shield of faith as needed and the last Greek verb translated “take…” (dexasthe) is an aorist middle imperative which is used of the last two pieces of armor and means for oneself to take them up as needed.
[6] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pp. 1820-1821.
[7] Adapted from Mark Bubeck’s video, “5. Belted Against Satan’s Belt: Ephesians 6 Series,” on the BRMinistry app.
[8] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Ephesians, 2024 Edition, pg. 147 cites A. Skevington Wood, “Ephesians,” in Ephesians-Philemon Vol. 11 of The Expositor’s Bible Commentary 12 vols., Edited by Frank E. Gaebelein and J. D. Douglas (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1978), pg. 87.
[9] Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature: Third Edition revised and edited by Frederick William Danker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000 Kindle Edition), pp. 463-464.
[10] Mark Bubeck’s video, “5. Belted Against Satan’s Belt: Ephesians 6 Series,” on the BRMinistry app.
[11] Adapted from Tony Evan’s video message entitled, “Breastplate of Righteousness,” on youtube.com
[13] Much of this section is adapted from Ibid., unless otherwise noted.
[14] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pp. 247-248.
[15] Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2417.
[16] Evans, video message entitled, “Breastplate of Righteousness,” on youtube.com.
[17] Much of this section is adapted from Ibid., unless otherwise noted.
[18] The following eleven paragraphs in this section are adapted from Bubeck, “5. Belted Against Satan’s Belt: Ephesians 6 Series,” on the BRMinistry app., unless otherwise noted
[19] See article entitled, “Can a Christian Commit Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit?” at this LINK
[20] Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 2000 Kindle Edition, pg. 597.
[21] David R. Anderson, Position and Condition: An Exposition of the Book of Ephesians (Grace Theological Press, 2017 Kindle Edition), pp. 435-436.
With tensions escalating in our world today, you may be wondering how much longer you will be able to live here on earth. This VIDEO explains from the Bible what you must do to go to heaven, whether you have 60 seconds or 60 years to live. Please share this video with those you want to see in heaven. Thank you.
Note: The Acts 16 pictures belong to Sweet Publishing / FreeBibleimages.org. The movie clip of hell is used with permission from the makers of The Free Gift movie.
Many Americans, including born again Christians, relegate the topic of spiritual warfare to “the old days” during the Middle and Dark Ages when “people were not as enlightened as we are now,” they argue. “We know so much more than those people did, so we don’t have to ascribe to a supernatural explanation to many of the things that happen to us today. Modern science and the principles of psychology can account for many of the things our ancestors thought were supernatural.” [1]
Americans tend to believe that spirits are only active in countries that are more primitive such as in animistic nations. Animism is where people believe God left His spirits – good and bad – to run the world. Though animistic people don’t fret about the good spirits, they spend their whole lives afraid of offending the evil spirits. Americans believe animistic people struggle with real or imagined spiritual enemies because of their openness to them.[2]
While Christians are correct to reject the animistic view of the world, they are incorrect to believe that everything that happens on earth can be addressed by natural or scientific explanations. Too many believers have concluded that the spirit world is not real or relevant or even needs to be dealt with.
Sometimes Christians think they can compartmentalize spiritual warfare and shove it into a corner and let “the experts” deal with it. They will just deal with their “flesh” (Eph. 2:3) and the “world” (Eph. 2:2a), and not mess with the spiritual realm (“the prince of the power of the air” – Eph. 2:2b). I was like this until more recently.
Spiritual Warfare Clarified
When the Bible speaks of spiritual warfare it is presented as a worldview. It is two kingdoms in conflict. The kingdom of God is in conflict against the kingdom of darkness (Matt. 12:22-30). Therefore, the apostle Paul can say when a person comes to faith in Jesus, he or she has been “delivered from the power [exousia = authority] of darkness and conveyed … into the kingdom of the Son of His love.” (Col. 1:13).[3]
Hence, when the Bible addresses spiritual warfare, it is a way of viewing everyday life. It is not a compartmentalized ministry. It is not some dramatic display of bizarre stuff going on like is depicted in The Exorcist movie. Spiritual warfare is a way of viewing life. It is recognizing that Jesus is powerfully at work in the world today. This world is not a Christian’s permanent home (cf. Phil. 3:20). We are just visiting this planet (I Pet. 2:11) and there is something much bigger on the other side of this life. [4]
God has something He wants to accomplish through His people. God wants to deliver people who have been victimized by the kingdom of darkness and bring them into His Church, where they can find redemption that is in the Lord Jesus Christ (Eph. 1:7). He wants to bring them freedom from the bondage that is oppressing them (John 8:31-36).
The First Century Context
In today’s reflection, we are going to begin looking at one of the most important passages in the Bible concerning spiritual warfare – Ephesians 6:10-20. Before we look closely at the first three verses in this passage, we need to look at the first century context in which this letter was written.
The author of Ephesians is the apostle “Paul” (Eph. 1:1) who wrote this letter in A.D. 60 during his first imprisonment (Eph. 3:1; 4:1; 6:20) in Rome. [5] Paul was set apart by God to make three missionary journeys to take the gospel to Gentile nations (Acts 13:1ff). Near the end of his second missionary journey, Paul came to the city of Ephesus for a short time on his way back to Antioch (Acts 18:19-22).
On his third missionary journey, Paul stayed in Ephesus for approximately three years (Acts 20:31) where several amazing things happened through Paul. These included Paul baptizing a dozen of John the Baptist’s followers (Acts 19:1-7). He had discussions in the hall of Tyrannus which resulted in “all who dwelt in Asia” hearing “the word of the Lord” (Acts 19:8-10). Unusual miracles occurred which caused “evil spirits” to go out of people (Acts 19:11-12). When Jewish exorcists and the seven sons of Sceva tried to imitate Paul by attempting to cast out evil spirits in the name of the Lord Jesus, they were overpowered by the evil spirits which caused the citizens of Ephesus to live in fear (Acts 19:13-17). Many of the new believers who “practiced magic” confessed their occultic practices and burned “their [occultic] books… in the sight of all” (Acts 19:19-20). The city rioted over silversmith Demetrius’ loss of business because of people who turned to Christ from worshiping the great Ephesian goddess Diana or Artemis (Acts 19:23-41). [6]
We also know from history that Ephesus was the third largest city in the Roman Empire with a population of about 250,000 to 500,000 people. It was the hub for reaching all Asia Minor (i.e., modern-day western Turkey) with the gospel (Acts 19:10). It was a culturally diverse city, having been colonized by the Greeks and then by the Persians. When Paul wrote to the Christians in Ephesus, they were under the Roman government. All the residents of Ephesus believed in gods and goddesses. [7] Ephesus was world famous for the Temple of Diana (i.e., Artemis), who was revered as the mother goddess who had supposedly fallen from heaven and was worshiped there. [8]The general population of Ephesus was animistic. It was a hotbed for magical practices which included summoning spirits to do good and bad things. [9]
When Jesus said, “Bless those who curse you” (Luke 6:28), the word “curse” meant more than saying a four-letter word to someone in the first century. It referred to summoning spirits to cause you harm. The people of Ephesus would call on angels for protection along with their gods and goddesses. These people had tremendous fears. They were taught that there were good spirits who could help them against evil spirits. We will see in today’s verses that Paul confronts these beliefs and tells the Ephesian Christians that these “good spirits” they thought would help them against evil spirits are really in league with “the prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2:2b). [10]
Ephesians 6:10-13
With this said, let’s look at Ephesians 6:10-13. Paul begins by writing, “Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might.” (Eph. 6:10). The word “Finally” (to loipou), refers to more than the final topic of his book to the Ephesian believers (“brethren”). Paul is saying, “Finally, I can say to you what I’ve wanted to tell you about spiritual warfare. But first, I had to prepare you for this topic, and it took five and a half chapters to do that.”[11] [emphasis added]
Paul prepared his Christian readers (including us) for spiritual warfare by talking about the spiritual blessings or resources we have in Christ (Eph. 1:3-14). Next, he prayed for us to understand and experience God’s great power in raising Christ from the dead (Eph. 1:15-23) and then spoke of the authority we have in Jesus (Eph. 2:1-6). After praying for his readers to be rooted in the unlimited love of Christ (Eph. 3:17-19), Paul advises us not to grieve the Holy Spirit by giving “place” or ground to the devil through unresolved anger (Eph. 4:25-31). Instead, we are to be “filled” or controlled by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 5:18) in all our relationships, including relations with church members (Eph. 5:19-21), spouses (Eph. 5:22-33), children (Eph. 6:1-4), and work relationships (Eph. 6:5-9).
After talking about all these relationships with different people, Paul wants us to understand that people are not our primary problem. Our struggles with people are rooted in the spiritual realm.
Hence, Paul says, “Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might.” (Eph. 6:10). Human strength is not enough to defeat our spiritual enemies. We must “be strong in the Lord and in the power [kratos – power that overcomes resistance] of His might [ischuos – inherent strength].” Some of the same words Paul used for God’s great power in raising Jesus from the dead (Eph. 1:19-21) are used here.
Next Paul writes, “Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.” (Eph. 6:11). The Ephesian believers are commanded to “put on the whole armor of God,”not just some of His armor. For what purpose? That they “may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.” The battle that Christians face every day is “against the wiles of the devil.” The Greek word translated “wiles” (methodeias) refers to the methods or strategies of “the devil” that he employs to deceive or trick us. [12]
Satan “is happy for you to picture him as a cartoon character wearing a red jumpsuit with horns and carrying a pitchfork so that you won’t take him seriously. Meanwhile, like an opposing football team, his demonic realm watches your game film. They know your history, your weak spots, and your sin patterns. Their goal is to keep you from experiencing God’s will for your life. You’re not their first assignment. They’re good at what they do.”[13] [emphasis added]
We need God’s armor to deal with the spiritual roots of our problems. Why? “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.” (Eph. 6:12). Before we can put on the armor of God, Paul wants us to know who we are fighting against. The apostle mentions four groupings of demonic spirits we are battling.
The first group is “principalities.” The Greek word for “principalities” is archas which refers to “an authority figure who initiates activity or process, ruler, authority” and can include “the sphere or domain of one’s official activity, rule, office.”[14] Hence, the word prince is an appointed authority, and a municipality indicates a region or sphere of political governance. So, these demonic spirits are appointed to govern over certain geographical areas in the kingdom of darkness. [15]
No wonder we see so much confusion and disunity among nations today and even within our own country. But it is easily explained when we remember that these great unseen “principalities” are exercising the deciding influence among political leaders today. [16]
An example of this grouping of demons is seen in Daniel 10. Daniel was told by an angel that his prayer had been heard and answered, but that the angel bringing the answer was delayed for twenty-one days by “the prince of the kingdom of Persia” (Dan. 10:12-13). That this was an angel and not a mere human is supported by the fact that the archangel Michael had to be called upon for help. Hence, this “prince” was a demonic principality.
The second group Paul addresses is “powers” (exousias). This word refers to demons who seek to have power or “ruling authority”[17] over the lives of individuals. They especially want to exercise control over God’s people.
Have you ever sensed any dominant feelings when you walk into a building? When I did an evangelism internship in the inner city of Dallas, TX in the mid 1980s, I would go from apartment building to apartment building seeking to share the gospel with the lost. In some apartments, I would get an overwhelming sense of hopelessness that was written on the faces of the tenants. In another building, I might get a predominant feeling of violence or immorality. I believe these overwhelming feelings were the presence of these demonic “powers” that sought to influence people. Many missionaries believe the controlling spirit over America is materialism which has led the masses to forget about God and focus on their own self-sufficiency.
The third grouping of demonic spirits is “the rulers of the darkness of this age.” The Greek word translated “rulers” is kosmokratoras and literally means “world-rulers/powers.”[18] Logan suggests that these are demons assigned to men and women in leadership to influence their decisions for the kingdom of darkness. He believes that pastors also have this demon assigned to them. [19]
These demonic rulers seek to keep humanity in the darkness of Satan’s world system. From them come cunningly devised teachings intended to draw people away from God or even deny that He exists. “A prime example is evolution, which, though backed by no genuine evidence, is yet accepted… by the scientific community of our day. It is propagated and defended with blind allegiance and is forced upon children and youth in our schools as a reality.”[20] [emphasis added]
The fourth and final group is “spiritual hosts of wickedness” (pneumatika tes ponerias) or “spirit- forces of evil.”[21] Logan believes these are evil spirits associated with religion. He states, “Did you know that more people around the world are turning to New Age teaching than are turning to Christ? That’s even true in the former Soviet Union and the countries of Eastern Europe which have so recently been freed from communism.
“How do you account for this? There is no world headquarters for the New Age movement. They don’t send out missionaries. I don’t think you can explain this kind of thing in merely human terms.
“Consider the unquestioning loyalty of the Branch Davidians outside Waco, Texas in early 1993. The authorities had to restrain David Koresh’s people from running back into the building to be burned up. Consider also the willingness of most parents to give their children poisoned Kool-Aid at the command of Jim Jones in Guyana. Would any parent normally do that? The only explanation for such behavior – a kind of religious fanaticism and delusion that resulted in senseless death – is demonic influence.”[22] [emphasis added]
Notice that all these demonic spirits are “in the heavenly places” (Eph. 6:12b; cf. Eph. 1:3, 20; 2:6; 3:10) which refers “to the spiritual realm where God and Satan battle for our allegiance. We live in the physical realm with our problems, needs, struggles, and sins. But whatever happens in the physical realm originates in the spiritual realm. Conflict in our homes, then, is a spiritual problem. Although conflict is visible fruit, its root is spiritual in nature. Thus, we need a spiritual solution to our circumstances. That’s why we must live with a spiritual worldview.”[23]
Paul then writes, “Therefore, take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.” (Eph. 6:13). Our spiritual enemy wants us to fear, but God wants us to “stand.” Four times the word “stand” or a form of it is used in Ephesians 6:10-14. Why? Because we have an enemy that wants to knock us down and keep us down. Hence, it is extremely important that we take up “the whole armor of God” to withstand intense spiritual attacks “in the evil day.” This last phrase refers to a full-frontal Satanic attack [24] from the pit of hell. In Luke 4 after Satan finished tempting Jesus in the wilderness, Luke tells us the Devil “departed from Him until an opportune time” when he would unleash his worst attacks (Luke 4:13). So “the evil day” refers to the time when great spiritual attacks take place in a Christian’s life, when all hell breaks loose. [25]
Evans explains, “Through the cross and resurrection of Christ, victory is already won. The devil has lost. The only power he has is the power you give him. We are to stand firm in Christ’s victory. Paul tells the Ephesians over and over: stand (6:11, 13-14). In other words, stay in the area where victory has been achieved under the cover of God’s armor. When you stand under an umbrella, it doesn’t stop the rain. But it does stop you from getting wet. You have to dress for success in this thing called the Christian life.”[26]
The Authority of the Believer
Keep in mind that Paul tells us that God the Father (Eph. 1:17) “20 raised” Jesus “from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, 21 far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come.” (Eph. 1:20-21). The Lord Jesus Christ is in the seat of highest authority “in the heavenly places, far above all” angelic beings (“principality and power and might and dominion”), including Satan and his demonic armies. All spiritual authorities and rulers are subject to Jesus Christ, “not only in this age” in which we live, “but also in that which is to come.”
Remember when Jesus met His disciples on a mountain in Galilee after His resurrection? He said to them, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth.” (Matt. 28:18). There are two different Greek words sometimes translated “power” in the Bible. Dunamis means the ability to carry out [27] and perform and is properly translated “power.”Exousia means the right to use power [28]and is properly translated “authority.” Christ uses the second word here, exousia – the right to use His ability to do all things. Christ has legitimate authority, Satan does not.
For example, suppose I walk out of the Bankers Trust building and for no reason at all, a six-foot six inch, three-hundred-pound madman comes charging down the sidewalk, flying into me and sprawling me all over the ground. He, being bigger than me, has the power; but he has no right to do that. On the other hand, suppose I had just robbed that bank, and it was a six-foot six inch, three-hundred-pound policeman who tackled me. He would have the authority – both the ability and the right to use that ability. That is what Jesus is claiming here. He has “all authority… in heaven and on earth.”
The authority Jesus exercised over demons “on earth” (cf. Matt. 8:16, 28-33; 9:32-33; 12:21-22; 15:22-25; 17:18; Mark 1:25-27, 32-34, 39; 3:14-15; 5:1-18; 7:25-30; 9:25; 16:9; Luke 4:33-41; 8:2, 26; 9:1, 42; 10:17; 11:13-14; 13:32; et al) is also the same authority He exercises over them “in the heavenly places.” Demons could not resist Christ or disobey Him on earth. When He asked them their name, they told Him (cf. Mark 5:9; Luke 8:30). When He commanded them to leave their host, they left (cf. Matt. 8:16; 9:32-33; 17:18; Mark 1:32-34; Luke 4:33-36). When He told them to be quiet, they were silent (cf. Mark 1:34; Luke 4:35, 41). They went where Christ sent them (Matt. 8:31-32; Mark 5:11-13; 9:25-27; Luke 8:27-33). His command was final.
I believe we receive this same authority of Christ when we receive eternal life by believing in Jesus. “But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right [exousia = authority] to become children of God, to those who believe in His name.” (John 1:12). So, this authority is accessible to all Christians.
In Luke 9:1, we read, “Then He called His twelve disciples together and gave them power [dunamis] and authority [exousia] over all demons.” Christ had just shown His power and authority over demons (Luke 8:2, 26-35), and now He was giving His power and authority to His disciples. Behind the “authority” possessed by us as believers, there is a “power” that is infinitely greater than that which backs our spiritual enemies, and which they are compelled to recognize.
When the seventy returned from preparing the way for Jesus in every city and place where He was about to go (Luke 10:1), they told Jesus, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name.” (Luke 10:17). The word translated “subject” (hupatassō) is a military term and refers to voluntarily placing oneself under the authority of another. [29] It conveys the ideas of submission and obedience. Notice that demons were subject to the seventy in Jesus’ name. They were submitting to Christ’s authority given to these believers.
Christ then said to the seventy, “Behold, I give you the authority [exousia] … over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means hurt you.” (Luke 10:19). I used to believe this authority Christ gave His disciples was limited to the first century as a way of confirming God’s message and messengers. But what the apostle Paul teaches in Ephesians has persuaded me to believe otherwise.
This incredible power of God is described by the apostle Paul in Ephesians 1:19: “What is the exceeding greatness of His power [dunamis – dynamic supernatural power from which we get our English word dynamite] toward us who believe, according to the working [energeian – energetic power from which comes the English word energy] of His mighty [kratous – power that overcomes resistance] power [ischuos – inherent strength].”[30] God’s power was much too great for the powers of darkness to prevent Jesus’ resurrection.
This amazing accumulation of words for God’s power underscores the magnitude of “the exceeding greatness of His power” which is available to Christians. If our circumstances are difficult, we need to remember that God’s great power “raised” Jesus from “the dead.” Our circumstances cannot get any worse than that! And that same resurrection power is available to us. Through our connection with Jesus, God can invade our circumstances and demonstrate that He is sufficient. [31]
Let’s now compare the status of the Lord Jesus in Ephesians 1:19-20 with the changing status of unbelievers to believers in Ephesians 2:1-6: [32]
Ephesians 1:19-20Status of the Lord Jesus Christ
Ephesians 2:1-2, 5-6Status of Unbelievers Becoming Believers
“…according to the working [energeia – energy] of His mighty power” – Eph. 1:19
“…according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works [energeō – energizing] in the sons of disobedience.” – Eph. 2:2
“….from the dead…” – Eph. 1:20b
“And you… were dead in trespasses and sins… even when we were dead in trespasses” – Eph. 2:1, 5a
“… which He worked [energeō – energized] in Christ when He raised [egeirō] Him…” – Eph. 1:20a
“…made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up together [sunegeirō]…” – Eph. 2:5b-6a
“…and seated [kathizō] Him at His right hand…” – Eph. 1:20b
“…and made us sit together [sugkathizō]…” – Eph. 2:6b
“in the heavenly places…” – Eph. 1:20c
“in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus…” Eph. 2:6c
The Holy Spirit led the apostle Paul to structure this entire passage to show that the Lord Jesus and His people were raised together:[33]
Christ was dead… We were dead
God energized Christ … God made us alive together with Christ
Christ was raised up from the dead… We were raised up with Him
God seated Christ at His right hand in the heavenly places… God seated us with Christ in the heavenly places
The great power of God which raised Jesus from the dead, also raised His body, the church, spiritually. Head (Jesus) and body (the church) are naturally raised together. Jesus Christ is now “seated” at the “right hand” of God the Father “far above all principality and power and might and dominion,” including the Devil and his demonic armies, “in the heavenly places.” (Eph. 1:20-21). And when God the Father sees His Son sitting at His right hand at the place of highest authority, He also sees you and I seated there, too (see diagram above). When we were saved by grace through faith in Jesus, we were relocated to the heavenly places seated next to the Lord Jesus (Eph. 2:5-6). As God’s people, we now occupy with Jesus the same exalted position of power and authority. We no longer need to be afraid of Satan and his demonic servants because we are seated next to Jesus Who occupies the seat of highest authority in the heavenly places.
To be elevated to the heavenly places next to Jesus “has no other meaning than that we are made sharers, potentially and partially for the present age, of the authority which is His. We are made to sit with Him; that is, we share His throne. To share a throne means without question to partake of the authority which it represents.”[34] [emphasis added]
“In God’s plan we have been elevated for this very purpose: that we may even now exercise, to the extent that we embrace it spiritually, the authority over the powers of the air. This includes authority over the conditions which those powers have caused on the earth and are still creating through their endless manipulations of the minds and circumstances of humanity.”[35] [emphasis added]
Evans explains, “Think of this like a video teleconference in which you’re in two places at once—seated physically in one place but operating in another. Believers are present in two places at the same time: we’re physically located on earth but operate from heavenly places. God wants our position there to dictate our activity on earth. Only by operating from a spiritual perspective will you have access to God’s kingdom power and provisions to deal victoriously with life in the physical realm.”[36] [emphasis added]
Conclusion
When the apostle Paul said we do not “wrestle” against flesh and blood (Eph. 6:12a), he was describing a type of wrestling that is far different than we are used to seeing on TV today, which is often nothing more than entertainment.
“In Paul’s day, wrestling matches were serious, grim events. Usually, two slaves would wrestle in a final match until one of them could no longer get up. The winner would then climb to his feet and put his foot on the neck of the loser. He would call for a sword and flick out the eyes of the loser, who would walk in darkness the rest of his life as a reminder that he lost the wrestling match.
“Why would a wrestler risk blindness like that? Because the slave who won was set free along with his family. Their names were inscribed on the wall of the city, he never had to pay taxes again, and his children would have access to the finest education. It was worth the risk.”[37] [emphasis added]
When you and I wrestle against principalities and powers in the demonic realm, there is a lot at stake as well. If we lose, if we fail to exercise the authority the Lord Jesus has given us over the demonic realm and do not wear the full armor of God, we will fall into sin that breaks our closeness or fellowship with God and can lead us into increasing spiritual attacks and bondage to sin and shame.
If we have been losing our battles with temptation, it is important to get alone with the Lord and ask Him to show us where we are vulnerable. It may be anger or bitterness, fear or worry, envy or pride, unforgiveness, childhood trauma and wounds, etc. Satan knows our areas of vulnerability. But so does the Lord, and He can show us what they are and how to be prepared to “stand” in the victory He has already won through His death and resurrection. Next time, Lord willing, we will begin to look at how to wear the whole armor of God.
[29] Tom Constable, Dr. Constable’s Notes on Ephesians, 2024 Edition, pp. 119-120 cites The Nelson Study Bible edited by Earl D. Radmacher (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1997), pg. 1990.
[30] The meanings of these Greek words are taken from Hoehner, The Bible Knowledge Commentary Acts and Epistles, 2018 Kindle Edition, pg. 436.
[31] Tony Evans, The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, 2019 Kindle Edition, pg. 2637.
[32] Adapted from Macmillan and King, The Authority of Believers, 2023 Kindle Location 301.
In today’s reflections, I will be sharing a summary of what the Lord Jesus has been teaching me through Biblical Restoration Ministries (BRM) concerning the biblical process for finding freedom in Christ that delivers us from spiritual bondage.
As stated in the first part of this spiritual warfare series, Satan is a defeated enemy. He has been stripped of his power at the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ (Col. 2:13-15; Heb. 2:14-15). The Devil has no power over God’s children except what we permit him to have in our Christian lives. Here is a summary of the steps to freedom in Christ: [1]
1. WE MUST SEE AND FEEL SIN AS JESUS DOES. That is, we must have a genuine repentance of sin. When a Christian expresses a desire to find freedom in Christ, it is important not to assume that he or she has genuinely repented of his or her sin. Only the Holy Spirit can convict us of sin (cf. John 16:7-11).
The apostle Paul wrote to the believers at Corinth, “8 For even if I made you sorry with my letter, I do not regret it; though I did regret it. For I perceive that the same epistle made you sorry, though only for a while. 9 Now I rejoice, not that you were made sorry, but that your sorrow led to repentance. For you were made sorry in a godly manner, that you might suffer loss from us in nothing.” (2 Cor. 7:8-9). The “sorrow” the Corinthians felt from a previous “letter” Paul wrote to them, was of a “godly manner” (2 Cor. 7:8-9). This sorrow they felt was what God felt about their sin. Since Jesus dwells in our hearts through the Holy Spirit (Eph. 3:16-17; Gal. 2:20), genuine repentance of a Christian feels what Jesus feels about something, especially our sin. This is key to experiencing victory over spiritual bondage. When we feel and think the same way as Jesus does about our sin, we experience God’s deliverance from that sin.
“For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death.” (2 Cor. 7:10). “Godly sorrow” or grief about our sin that God sees and feels, “produces repentance leading to salvation.” The word “salvation” refers to “deliverance” from that sin. Since Paul is writing to Christians (2 Cor. 1:1, 8, 19-24; 3:2-3; 4:13-14; et al.), he is not talking about deliverance from the penalty of sin to get to heaven. He is talking about deliverance from the power of sin so one may grow spiritually and experience victory in his or her Christian life over that sin.
“The sorrow of the world” is grief about getting caught in our sin or having to face the consequences of our sin. This type of sorrow does not deliver from that sin. Instead, this grief produces “death.” Godly sorrow feels and sees sin the same way God does and leads to repentance that delivers from that sin.
2. WE MUST TAKE BACK THE GROUND GIVEN TO THE ENEMY. As discussed in part 1 of this spiritual warfare series, we give “place” or “ground” to the Devil (Eph. 4:26-27) when we refuse to let go of our sin, confess it, and forsake it (Prov. 28:13). Satan wants to build his “strongholds” (2 Cor. 10:4) of lies on the ground we have given him which will begin to undermine our relationship with and testimony for Jesus.
After repenting, the way we take back that ground we have given to the enemy is by making an open declaration that what we did was wrong. This involves announcing that in the mighty name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the power of His blood, we are asking Him to take back any ground we have yielded to Satan. We announce to the forces of evil that right now, we renounce Satan’s works and ways in our lives, and that we want nothing to do with them any longer.
Logan writes, “For many this declaration is where the real battle starts. Why? Because they are standing against Satan, in most cases for the first time in their lives! These are Christians who have let Satan push them around and keep them in bondage their whole lives without ever once resisting him.
“Remember that ‘ground’ is legal jurisdiction. It is like giving the enemy the key to my house. Whey I yield ground, I am giving the enemy permission to attack me with destructive thoughts and temptations. Looking at it from another angle, I have strayed into his jurisdiction, his territory, and that gives him a claim I must renounce.” [2] [emphasis added]
The occult is one area where we can clearly give Satan ground on which to build his strongholds. Other areas include bitterness, lack of a clear conscience, pride, sexual sin, and unforgiveness. [3]
Once all the ground has been taken back from the Devil (his legal right to attack us), then it is time to command the enemy in the name and blood of the Lord Jesus Christ to leave and go where Jesus sends him, never to return nor send replacements.
3. TEARING DOWN STRONGHOLDS. The Devil is a liar (John 8:44). As discussed in part 1, a “stronghold” is a fortress of lies that Satan builds in our hearts and minds (2 Cor. 10:4). Unlike fortresses that are built with stone and brick, these strongholds cannot be destroyed by the weapons of our flesh.
What undermines and destroys a lie? The truth! Christ said that the truth is what sets us free from bondage to sin and shame (John 8:31-32). The more we abide in Jesus’ word, the more we will know the truth which will help us identify the lies we have believed so we can replace them with Jesus’ truth (cf. Psa. 119:28-29).
Keep in mind that Satan is a deceiver (Rev. 12:9). Since Jesus defeated the Devil at the cross (Col. 2:13-15), Satan’s only power in our lives now is in the lie and deception. A deception is when our mind and emotions believe something that is not true. Deceptions may be 90 percent truth and only 10 percent lie, but the power of a deception is only broken when we discern that it is a lie.
Our enemy is not only a liar and a deceiver, but he is also “the accuser of our brethren” (Rev. 12:10). Satan will accuse God to me, me to God, and me to me. He will intrude his thoughts into our minds and then accuse us for having them. [4]
For example, if you listen to your parents constantly criticizing you, you will begin to believe you can’t do anything right or be good enough. Satan can use that critical voice to develop thoughts and feelings of deep inadequacy and insecurity so that they become a stronghold in your life.
The Bible says the Devil is “the ruler of the world” (John 12:31; 2 Cor. 4:3-4; Eph. 2:2). He can use his world system to shape our beliefs. He may use family, peers, education, politics, television, social media, and even the music we listen to. That is why it is essential that we renew our minds by thinking God’s thoughts through the power of the Holy Spirit and the Word of God (Rom. 12:2). One way to do that is by focusing our minds on what is true, noble, just, pure, lovely, and of good report (Phil. 4:8).
4. BUILDING TOWERS OF TRUTH. When we tear down a stronghold, it is important to build a tower of truth in its place. This involves reprogramming our minds with the truth about ourselves, God, and Satan and his ways. God’s Word, the Bible, is the ultimate source of the truth we need to replace Satan’s strongholds of lies. Then when the Devil comes with his intruding thoughts – lies, deceptions, and accusations – we can flee to the tower.
I love this verse: “The name of the Lord is a strong tower; the righteous run to it and are safe.” (Prov. 18:10). “The name of the Lord” Jesus Christ is our strong tower. He is “the truth” (John 14:6) and He is “full of truth” (John 1:14). When we “run” (not walk) to Jesus and listen to and do what Jesus says to us in His word, we can be “safe” from the attacks of the evil one.
5. TAKING THOUGHTS CAPTIVE. The Bible instructs us, “3 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh. 4 For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, 5 casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ.” (2 Cor. 10:3-5). Spiritual warfare takes place in the mind of Christians. We see this with the use of the following words: “arguments… knowledge… thought.”
God wants us to take “every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ” (2 Cor. 10:5). We are to bring our thoughts in line with what God desires and what pleases Him.
Evans writes, “Satan’s strategy is to block the knowledge and/or application of God’s Word in the thinking of believers so that they can be held hostage by his lies, which are communicated through false teaching.
“If addictive behavior is present in a person’s life, that behavior is not the stronghold but merely its fruit. Strongholds can only be demolished by the knowledge of God – that is, by truth. As Jesus told his disciples, ‘The truth will set you free’ (John 8:32). When your relationship to the living Word connects to the written Word, ‘you really will be free’ (John 8:36). If you’re not taking every thought captive to obey Christ and are instead succumbing to a stronghold, it’s because you either don’t know the truth or aren’t making use of the truth you know.”[5] [emphasis added]
Another reason a Christian may not be taking every thought captive to obey Christ and is therefore succumbing to a stronghold, is because the thought is not from himself. It may be from the Devil or his wicked spirits. Such a thought requires Jesus to take that thought captive. I believe this is what happened in Matthew 16:21-23.
When Jesus predicted His upcoming sufferings, crucifixion, and resurrection (Matt. 16:21), Peter rebuked Christ for talking about the cross. “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!” (Matt. 16:22). Immediately Jesus does not just inform Peter that this thought was from the Devil, but He rebukes the Devil, saying, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.” (Matt. 16:23).Jesus did not tell Peter to take that thought captive because he was not capable of doing that. Instead, Jesus rebuked the Devil. What this tells me is there are some of our thoughts that Christ Himself must take captive because they come from the enemy who is oppressing us.
How do we differentiate between our own thoughts and Satan’s when both are contrary to God’s will? I believe one way is to see if we can take them captive through prayer and the application of God’s Word. God wants us to control our thoughts. Otherwise, why would He tell us to take them captive to obey Christ (2 Cor. 10:5)? If we are unable to take the thoughts captive that are contrary to the will of God, it may be because they come from our enemy.
In recent years, I encountered thoughts that dominated my thinking and behavior which were contrary to my Christian beliefs and values. It was not until I went to Biblical Restoration Ministries that those dominating thoughts were taken to Jesus to send where He wanted them to go. This resulted in a new level of freedom from sin and shame that I had never experienced before. I give all the glory to my Lord Jesus in me Who is far greater than he who is in the world.
Lord willing, in the future we will begin to look at the spiritual conflict all Christians face and the resources God has given us to experience victory in our lives.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Much of the following is adapted from Jim Logan, Reclaiming Surrendered Ground (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995), pp. 38-42.
God wants us to know that we are far more than what we have been told by Satan and other people. No one has the power to define us but the One Who created us and redeemed us. God takes a lot of time in the Bible to tell us who we are when we become His children through faith in Jesus (John 1:12; I John 5:1). The phrase “in Christ” or “in Him” is used 120 times in the New Testament and refers to how God sees us after we become children of God by believing in Jesus.
Who am I after I come to faith in Jesus?
I am never alone (Deut. 31:6, 8; Isa. 41:10; Matt. 28:20; Heb. 13:5)
I am the apple of my Father’s eye (Ps. 17:8; Matt. 6:26; 10:29-31)
I am a delight to God (Ps. 18:19; Zeph. 3:17)
I am cherished and loved by God (Ps. 27:10)
I am hope-filled (Ps. 27:13; Jer. 29:11; Rom. 5:5)
I am helped, not helpless (Isa. 41:10, 13)
I am redeemed by God and therefore, I belong to Him (Isa. 43:1b).
I am always loved by God no matter what (Jer. 31:3; Rom. 5:8; 8:37-39)
I am the salt of the earth (Matt. 5:13)
I am the light of the world (Matt. 5:14)
I am a child of rest, no longer having to work for my salvation (Matt. 11:28)
I am precious to Jesus Who gave up everything to redeem or purchase me (Matt. 13:45-46; I Cor. 6:19-20; I Pet. 1:18-19)
I am given authority over all the power of the enemy (Luke 10:17, 19-20)
I am given everlasting life and will not be judged for my sins in the future (John 5:24)
I am free from bondage to sin positionally (John 8:31-36)
I am part of the True Vine, a channel of Christ’s life (John 15:1, 5)
I am chosen and appointed by Christ to produce lasting fruit (John 15:16)
I am given the power of the Holy Spirit inside me (Acts 1:8; Rom. 8:11; Gal. 5:22-23)
I am given peace with God through faith in Jesus (Rom. 5:1)
I am given hope because the love of God was poured out in my heart through the Holy Spirit (Rom. 5:5)
I am dead to sin (Rom. 6:2, 11; I Pet. 2:24)
I am set free from the power of sin (Rom. 6:2-11)
I am a slave of righteousness (Rom. 6:18)
I am slave of God (Rom. 6:22)
I have the Spirit of adoption by whom I cry out to God, ‘Abba (Daddy/Papa), Father.’” (Rom. 8:15)
I am free from accusation in Christ (Rom. 8:33)
I am free from condemnation in Christ (Rom. 8:34)
I have an eternal inheritance from God (glorified resurrection body/eternal dwelling on the New Earth) that cannot be taken from me (Rom. 8:17a; Gal. 3:26, 29; Eph. 1:14; cf. John 14:1-3; I Cor. 15:35-58; Phil. 3:21; Rev. 21-22)
I am more than a conqueror through Christ Who loved me (Rom. 8:37)
I can never be separated from God’s love (Rom. 8:38-39)
I have the mind of Christ (I Cor. 2:16)
I am a holy temple where the Holy Spirit now lives (I Cor. 3:16; 6:19; Eph. 2:21-22)
I am united to the Lord and am one spirit with Him (I Cor. 6:17)
I am a member of Christ’s body (I Cor. 12:27; Eph. 5:30)
I am not the great “I AM” (Exod. 3:14; John 8:24, 28, 58), but by the grace of God, I am what I am (I Cor. 15:10)
I am a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17)
I am reconciled to God (2 Cor. 5:18a)
I am a minister of reconciliation (2 Cor. 5:18b-19)
I am an ambassador for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20)
I am good enough in Christ (2 Cor. 5:21)
I am a bondservant of Christ (Gal. 1:10)
I can change because Jesus now lives inside me through His Spirit (Gal. 2:20; cf. Rom. 8:11)
I am redeemed from the curse of the Law (Gal. 3:13; I Pet. 1:18-19)
I am a son of God through faith in Jesus and am one in Christ (Gal. 3:26, 28)
I am a saint (one declared totally righteous) at the core of my being, not a sinner (Eph. 1:1; I John 3:9)
I am chosen or wanted by God (Eph. 1:4a; Col. 3:12a)
I am holy and without blame before God (Eph. 1:4b)
I am totally accepted by God in Christ (Eph. 1:6)
I am totally forgiven in Christ (Eph. 1:7; Col. 2:13-14)
I am sealed by the Holy Spirit Who guarantees my safe and secure delivery to God in heaven (Eph. 1:13-14)
I am God’s precious inheritance (Eph. 1:18)
I am seated in a position of authority and victory next to Jesus in the heavenly places far above all other authorities (Eph. 1:20-21; 2:5-6)
I am God’s masterpiece, not a mistake (Eph. 2:10)
I have been brought closer to God through the blood of Christ (Eph. 2:13)
I have instant access to the Father by one Spirit (Eph. 2:18)
I am a fellow-citizen with the rest of God’s family (Eph. 2:19)
I am a prisoner of Christ (Eph. 3:1; 4:1)
I am a new man created according to God, in true righteousness and holiness (Eph. 4:24)
I am a child of light, defined by the light of Jesus Christ, not by the darkness of my sin (Eph. 5:8; cf. John 12:36)
I am a citizen of heaven, seated in heaven right now (Phil. 3:20; Eph. 2:6)
I have what it takes in Christ (Phil. 4:13)
I am delivered from the power of darkness into the kingdom of the Son of His love (Col. 1:13)
I am complete in Christ, lacking nothing (Col. 2:10)
I am safely and securely hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
I am an expression of the life of Christ because He is my life (Col 3:4; Deut. 30:20).
I am deeply loved by God (Col. 3:12a; I John 3:1)
I am credited with Christ’s holiness and therefore I am accepted by God (Col. 3:12a)
I am a son of light and not of darkness (I Thess. 5:5)
I am a perfected worshiper of Christ through His once and for all sacrifice (Heb. 10:10, 14)
I am God’s child born again of the incorruptible seed of the Word of God that stands forever (I Pet. 1:3, 23)
I am one of God’s living stones being built up in Christ as a spiritual house (I Pet. 2:5)
I am a member of a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, and a holy nation (I Pet. 2:9a)
I am a special person to God (I Pet. 2:9b)
I am an alien and stranger to this world in which I temporarily live (I Pet. 2:11a)
I am cared for by God (I Pet. 5:7)
I am an enemy to the devil (I Pet. 5:8)
I am a child of God and will resemble Jesus when He returns (I John 3:1-2)
I am an overcomer because greater is He who is in me than he who is in the world (I John 4:4)
I overcame the world’s opposition when I believed in Jesus (I John 5:1, 4)
I am born of God and the wicked one cannot touch or harm my born-again nature (I John 5:18)
